159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29856186)
1. Robot-assisted laparoscopic single-site hysterectomy: our experience and multicentric comparison with single-port laparoscopy.
Cela V; Marrucci E; Angioni S; Freschi L
Minerva Ginecol; 2018 Oct; 70(5):621-628. PubMed ID: 29856186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transition from multiport to single-site surgery: A single institution experience in robotic supracervical hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases.
Chen CW; Chang HC; Huang TF; Liao CC; Huang RL; Lai HC
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 58(4):514-519. PubMed ID: 31307743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Bogliolo S; Ferrero S; Cassani C; Musacchi V; Zanellini F; Dominoni M; Spinillo A; Gardella B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):603-9. PubMed ID: 26898895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic single-site versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a propensity score matching study.
Paek J; Lee JD; Kong TW; Chang SJ; Ryu HS
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):1043-50. PubMed ID: 26092018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic.
Gungor M; Kahraman K; Dursun P; Ozbasli E; Genim C
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 28429119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between Robotic Single-Site and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy: Multicentric Analysis of Surgical Outcomes.
Gardella B; Dominoni M; Gritti A; Mereu L; Bogliolo S; Torella M; Fanfani F; Malzoni M; Couso A; Zapico A; Zapardiel I
Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Jan; 59(1):. PubMed ID: 36676747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, single-port and percutaneous hysterectomy: Comparison of perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive approaches in gynecologic surgery.
Rossitto C; Cianci S; Gueli Alletti S; Perrone E; Pizzacalla S; Scambia G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Sep; 216():125-129. PubMed ID: 28753500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Learning curve in concurrent application of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.
Torng PL; Pan SP; Hwang JS; Shih HJ; Chen CL
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 56(6):781-787. PubMed ID: 29241920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [New approach of learning curve for robotic-assisted gynecologic oncology surgery].
Yaribakht S; Guillemin F; Harter V; Malartic C; Marchal F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 May; 43(5):348-55. PubMed ID: 25813433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety, feasibility and learning curve of robotic single-site surgery in gynecology.
El Hachem L; Momeni M; Friedman K; Moshier EL; Chuang LT; Gretz HF
Int J Med Robot; 2016 Sep; 12(3):509-16. PubMed ID: 26096813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison of Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted, Single-Site Laparoscopy Versus Laparoendoscopic Single Site for Benign Hysterectomy.
Lopez S; Mulla ZD; Hernandez L; Garza DM; Payne TN; Farnam RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 26321172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without robotic assistance: a prospective controlled study.
Martínez-Maestre MA; Gambadauro P; González-Cejudo C; Torrejón R
Surg Innov; 2014 Jun; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 23833240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Initial experience with single-port robotic hysterectomy.
Gomes MTV; Machado AMN; Podgaec S; Barison GAS
Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2017; 15(4):476-480. PubMed ID: 29364368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Mancini E; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; di Luca Sidozzi A; Sperduti I; Pomati G; Vizza E
J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 27(4):e39. PubMed ID: 27171672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic single-site hysterectomy: feasibility, learning curve and surgical outcome.
Cela V; Freschi L; Simi G; Ruggiero M; Tana R; Pluchino N
Surg Endosc; 2013 Jul; 27(7):2638-43. PubMed ID: 23392975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic versus laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Prodromidou A; Spartalis E; Tsourouflis G; Dimitroulis D; Nikiteas N
J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):679-686. PubMed ID: 31956926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications: an update.
Bretschneider CE; Jallad K; Paraiso MFR
Minerva Ginecol; 2017 Jun; 69(3):295-303. PubMed ID: 28177208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
