These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29857734)

  • 1. Modeling talker- and listener-based sources of variability in babble-induced consonant confusions.
    Silbert NH; Motlagh Zadeh L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):2780. PubMed ID: 29857734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sources of Variability in Consonant Perception and Implications for Speech Perception Modeling.
    Zaar J; Dau T
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():437-446. PubMed ID: 27080685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling Speech Level as a Function of Background Noise Level and Talker-to-Listener Distance for Talkers Wearing Hearing Protection Devices.
    Bouserhal RE; Bockstael A; MacDonald E; Falk TH; Voix J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 60(12):3393-3403. PubMed ID: 29204606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sources of variability in consonant perception of normal-hearing listeners.
    Zaar J; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1253-67. PubMed ID: 26428764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consonant identification in N-talker babble is a nonmonotonic function of N.
    Simpson SA; Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov; 118(5):2775-8. PubMed ID: 16334654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The perceptual consequences of within-talker variability in fricative production.
    Newman RS; Clouse SA; Burnham JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1181-96. PubMed ID: 11303932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.
    Van Engen KJ; Bradlow AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan; 121(1):519-26. PubMed ID: 17297805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Listener sensitivity to individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3171-83. PubMed ID: 15237841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Molecular analysis of individual differences in talker search at the cocktail-party.
    Lutfi RA; Pastore T; Rodriguez B; Yost WA; Lee J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Sep; 152(3):1804. PubMed ID: 36182280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of Spanish consonant recognition in 8-talker babble.
    Moreno-Torres I; Otero P; Luna-Ramírez S; Garayzábal Heinze E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3079. PubMed ID: 28599525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech production modifications produced by competing talkers, babble, and stationary noise.
    Lu Y; Cooke M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Nov; 124(5):3261-75. PubMed ID: 19045809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acceptance noise level: effects of the speech signal, babble, and listener language.
    Shi LF; Azcona G; Buten L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 58(2):497-508. PubMed ID: 25629439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Across- and within-consonant errors for isolated syllables in noise.
    Toscano JC; Allen JB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Dec; 57(6):2293-307. PubMed ID: 25087617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
    Leibold LJ; Yarnell Bonino A; Buss E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):391-409. PubMed ID: 17469975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A method to identify noise-robust perceptual features: application for consonant /t/.
    Régnier MS; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2801-14. PubMed ID: 18529196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test.
    Markham D; Hazan V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):725-37. PubMed ID: 15324282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Consonant and vowel confusions in speech-weighted noise.
    Phatak SA; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2312-26. PubMed ID: 17471744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech understanding in noise with integrated in-ear and muff-style hearing protection systems.
    Abel SM; Nakashima A; Saunders D
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(55):378-84. PubMed ID: 22122953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.