These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29857767)

  • 21. Spectral properties and quantitative evaluation of hypernasality in vowels.
    Kataoka R; Michi K; Okabe K; Miura T; Yoshida H
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1996 Jan; 33(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 8849858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acoustic aspects of the formation of speech in children in the third year of life.
    Lyakso EE; Gromova AD; Frolova OV; Romanova OD
    Neurosci Behav Physiol; 2005 Jul; 35(6):573-83. PubMed ID: 16342613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of telepractice on pediatric cochlear implant users and provider vowel space: A preliminary report.
    Kondaurova MV; Zheng Q; Donaldson CW; Smith AF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan; 153(1):467. PubMed ID: 36732236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Vowel Acoustics as Predictors of Speech Intelligibility in Dysarthria.
    Thompson A; Hirsch ME; Lansford KL; Kim Y
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Aug; 66(8S):3100-3114. PubMed ID: 36795536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Vowel intelligibility in classical singing.
    Gregg JW; Scherer RC
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):198-210. PubMed ID: 16139988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Objective assessment of cleft lip and palate speech intelligibility using articulation and hypernasality measures.
    Kalita S; Girish KS; M P; Mahadeva Prasanna SR; Dandapat S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Aug; 146(2):1164. PubMed ID: 31472592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Voice low tone to high tone ratio: a potential quantitative index for vowel [a:] and its nasalization.
    Lee GS; Wang CP; Yang CC; Kuo TB
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 53(7):1437-9. PubMed ID: 16830950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acoustic analysis of vowels following glossectomy.
    Whitehill TL; Ciocca V; Chan JC; Samman N
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):135-40. PubMed ID: 16428229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of consonantal context on the learnability of vowel categories from infant-directed speech.
    Adriaans F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):EL20. PubMed ID: 30075685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing Vowel Centralization in Dysarthria: A Comparison of Methods.
    Fletcher AR; McAuliffe MJ; Lansford KL; Liss JM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 60(2):341-354. PubMed ID: 28124069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels.
    Ferguson SH; Kewley-Port D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1241-55. PubMed ID: 17905909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of cepstral analyses for differentiating normal from dysphonic voices: a comparative study of connected speech versus sustained vowel in European Portuguese female speakers.
    Brinca LF; Batista AP; Tavares AI; Gonçalves IC; Moreno ML
    J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 24491499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Vowel space density as an indicator of speech performance.
    Story BH; Bunton K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):EL458. PubMed ID: 28599542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The intelligibility of speech with "holes" in the spectrum.
    Kasturi K; Loizou PC; Dorman M; Spahr T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1102-11. PubMed ID: 12243158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Vowel formant discrimination for high-fidelity speech.
    Liu C; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1224-33. PubMed ID: 15376687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Formant centralization ratio: a proposal for a new acoustic measure of dysarthric speech.
    Sapir S; Ramig LO; Spielman JL; Fox C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 53(1):114-25. PubMed ID: 19948755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reconceptualizing the vowel space in analyzing regional dialect variation and sound change in American English.
    Fox RA; Jacewicz E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):444. PubMed ID: 28764485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using ultrasound and nasalance to separate oral and nasal contributions to formant frequencies of nasalized vowels.
    Carignan C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):2588. PubMed ID: 29857694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel.
    Miller JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 May; 85(5):2114-34. PubMed ID: 2659639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The correlation between nasalance and a differentiated perceptual rating of speech in Dutch patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency.
    Keuning KH; Wieneke GH; van Wijngaarden HA; Dejonckere PH
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):277-84. PubMed ID: 12019003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.