These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29857801)

  • 1. Scientists as experts: A distinct role?
    Gundersen T
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2018 Jun; 69():52-59. PubMed ID: 29857801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of experts on attitude change in public-facing political science: Scientific communication on term limits in the United States.
    Houck AM; King AS; Taylor JB
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 Apr; ():9636625241246084. PubMed ID: 38659207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is the public's role in 'space' policymaking? Images of the public by practitioners of 'space' communication in the United Kingdom.
    Entradas M
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jul; 25(5):603-11. PubMed ID: 25926503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific authority in policy contexts: Public attitudes about environmental scientists, medical researchers, and economists.
    O'Brien TL
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Oct; 22(7):799-816. PubMed ID: 24048622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Engaging Experts: Science-Policy Interactions and the Introduction of Congestion Charging in Stockholm.
    Broström A; McKelvey M
    Minerva; 2018; 56(2):183-207. PubMed ID: 29780180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return?
    Meyer G
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):433-46. PubMed ID: 27117771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Epistemic Trust in Scientific Experts: A Moral Dimension.
    Barimah GK
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2024 May; 30(3):21. PubMed ID: 38789842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Knowledge, behaviour, and policy: questioning the epistemic presuppositions of applying behavioural science in public policymaking.
    Małecka M
    Synthese; 2021; 199(1-2):5311-5338. PubMed ID: 33564201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Science to the rescue or contingent progress? Comparing 10 years of public, expert and policy discourses on new and emerging science and technology in the United Kingdom.
    Smallman M
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Aug; 27(6):655-673. PubMed ID: 28490253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Epistemic communities and experts in health policy-making.
    Löblová O
    Eur J Public Health; 2018 Nov; 28(suppl_3):7-10. PubMed ID: 30383255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reconciling scientists' beliefs about radiation risks and social norms: explaining preferred radiation protection standards.
    Silva CL; Jenkins-Smith HC; Barke RP
    Risk Anal; 2007 Jun; 27(3):755-73. PubMed ID: 17640221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The (co-)production of public uncertainty: UK scientific advice on mobile phone health risks.
    Stilgoe J
    Public Underst Sci; 2007 Jan; 16(1):45-61. PubMed ID: 17575708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stakeholder perceptions of scientists: Lake Tahoe environmental policy from 1984 to 2001.
    Weible CM
    Environ Manage; 2007 Dec; 40(6):853-65. PubMed ID: 17846831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.
    Bertuol-Garcia D; Morsello C; N El-Hani C; Pardini R
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 May; 93(2):1032-1055. PubMed ID: 29160024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Different roles and viewpoints of scientific experts in advising on environmental health risks.
    Spruijt P; Knol AB; Torenvlied R; Lebret E
    Risk Anal; 2013 Oct; 33(10):1844-57. PubMed ID: 23465050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining the use of health systems and policy research in the health policymaking process in Israel: views of researchers.
    Ellen ME; Lavis JN; Shemer J
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Sep; 14(1):66. PubMed ID: 27585630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Postmodernism for animal scientists.
    Schillo KK; Thompson PB
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Dec; 81(12):2989-94. PubMed ID: 14677854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Views of health system policymakers on the role of research in health policymaking in Israel.
    Ellen ME; Horowitz E; Vaknin S; Lavis JN
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2016; 5():24. PubMed ID: 27330738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The political contexts of evidence-based medicine: policymaking for daily hemodialysis.
    Gordon EJ
    Soc Sci Med; 2006 Jun; 62(11):2707-19. PubMed ID: 16376472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.