1263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29857862)
1.
Zhou W; Wen J; Hua F; Xu W; Lu X; Yin B; Geng D; Guan Y
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 104():26-32. PubMed ID: 29857862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic utility of intravoxel incoherent motion mr imaging in differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma multiforme.
Yamashita K; Hiwatashi A; Togao O; Kikuchi K; Kitamura Y; Mizoguchi M; Yoshimoto K; Kuga D; Suzuki SO; Baba S; Isoda T; Iwaki T; Iihara K; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Nov; 44(5):1256-1261. PubMed ID: 27093558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance in Lymphoma: Comparison With 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and With the Addition of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.
Giraudo C; Raderer M; Karanikas G; Weber M; Kiesewetter B; Dolak W; Simonitsch-Klupp I; Mayerhoefer ME
Invest Radiol; 2016 Mar; 51(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26784400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Usefulness and limitation of FDG-PET in the diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma].
Kawai N; Miyake K; Okada M; Yamamoto Y; Nishiyama Y; Tamiya T
No Shinkei Geka; 2013 Feb; 41(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 23378387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differentiating primary CNS lymphoma from glioblastoma multiforme: assessment using arterial spin labeling, diffusion-weighted imaging, and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
Yamashita K; Yoshiura T; Hiwatashi A; Togao O; Yoshimoto K; Suzuki SO; Abe K; Kikuchi K; Maruoka Y; Mizoguchi M; Iwaki T; Honda H
Neuroradiology; 2013 Feb; 55(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 22961074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The diagnostic role of (18)F-FDG PET for primary central nervous system lymphoma.
Yamaguchi S; Hirata K; Kobayashi H; Shiga T; Manabe O; Kobayashi K; Motegi H; Terasaka S; Houkin K
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Aug; 28(7):603-9. PubMed ID: 24743915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiating between Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and Glioblastoma: The Diagnostic Value of Combining
Hatakeyama J; Ono T; Takahashi M; Oda M; Shimizu H
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2021 Jun; 61(6):367-375. PubMed ID: 33967177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does adding FDG-PET to MRI improve the differentiation between primary cerebral lymphoma and glioblastoma? Observer performance study.
Makino K; Hirai T; Nakamura H; Murakami R; Kitajima M; Shigematsu Y; Nakashima R; Shiraishi S; Uetani H; Iwashita K; Akter M; Yamashita Y; Kuratsu J
Ann Nucl Med; 2011 Jul; 25(6):432-8. PubMed ID: 21404136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiating between Glioblastoma and Primary CNS Lymphoma Using Combined Whole-tumor Histogram Analysis of the Normalized Cerebral Blood Volume and the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient.
Bao S; Watanabe Y; Takahashi H; Tanaka H; Arisawa A; Matsuo C; Wu R; Fujimoto Y; Tomiyama N
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2019 Jan; 18(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 29848919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of
Norikane T; Mitamura K; Yamamoto Y; Manabe Y; Murao M; Arai-Okuda H; Hatakeyama T; Miyake K; Nishiyama Y
J Neurooncol; 2024 Jan; 166(1):195-201. PubMed ID: 38160415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lesions: initial results.
Heusch P; Buchbender C; Köhler J; Nensa F; Beiderwellen K; Kühl H; Lanzman RS; Wittsack HJ; Gomez B; Gauler T; Schuler M; Forsting M; Bockisch A; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Rofo; 2013 Nov; 185(11):1056-62. PubMed ID: 23860802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging of lymphoma nodal target lesions: Comparison of PET standardized uptake value (SUV) with MR apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).
Bernstine H; Domachevsky L; Nidam M; Goldberg N; Abadi-Korek I; Shpilberg O; Groshar D
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Apr; 97(16):e0490. PubMed ID: 29668631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI and (18)F-FDG PET/CT can discriminate between different lymphoma subtypes.
Mosavi F; Wassberg C; Selling J; Molin D; Ahlström H
Clin Radiol; 2015 Nov; 70(11):1229-36. PubMed ID: 26208992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation between standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient of neoplastic lesions evaluated with whole-body simultaneous hybrid PET/MRI.
Rakheja R; Chandarana H; DeMello L; Jackson K; Geppert C; Faul D; Glielmi C; Friedman KP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1115-9. PubMed ID: 24147485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary central nervous system lymphoma and atypical glioblastoma: differentiation using the initial area under the curve derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR and the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Choi YS; Lee HJ; Ahn SS; Chang JH; Kang SG; Kim EH; Kim SH; Lee SK
Eur Radiol; 2017 Apr; 27(4):1344-1351. PubMed ID: 27436023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient with simultaneous MR/positron emission tomography in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: comparison with 18F-FDG-PET.
Schwenzer NF; Schmidt H; Gatidis S; Brendle C; Müller M; Königsrainer I; Claussen CD; Pfannenberg AC; Schraml C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Nov; 40(5):1121-8. PubMed ID: 24923481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Volume-based parameters on FDG PET may predict the proliferative potential of soft-tissue sarcomas.
Kitao T; Shiga T; Hirata K; Sekizawa M; Takei T; Yamashiro K; Tamaki N
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Jan; 33(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 30196378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative Evaluation of Diffusion and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Differentiation Between Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and Glioblastoma.
Lu S; Wang S; Gao Q; Zhou M; Li Y; Cao P; Hong X; Shi H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017; 41(6):898-903. PubMed ID: 28806317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical value of texture analysis of dual-time-point
Nakajo M; Jinguji M; Aoki M; Tani A; Sato M; Yoshiura T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1759-1769. PubMed ID: 31728684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic value of FDG-PET and DWI in breast cancer.
Kitajima K; Miyoshi Y; Yamano T; Odawara S; Higuchi T; Yamakado K
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jan; 32(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 29134565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]