These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29858179)

  • 1. Evaluation of keratoconus progression.
    Shajari M; Steinwender G; Herrmann K; Kubiak KB; Pavlovic I; Plawetzki E; Schmack I; Kohnen T
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 103(4):551-557. PubMed ID: 29858179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients.
    Muftuoglu O; Ayar O; Hurmeric V; Orucoglu F; Kılıc I
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Mar; 41(3):557-65. PubMed ID: 25708211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Longitudinal Evaluation of the Progression of Keratoconus Using a Novel Progression Display.
    Kosekahya P; Caglayan M; Koc M; Kiziltoprak H; Tekin K; Atilgan CU
    Eye Contact Lens; 2019 Sep; 45(5):324-330. PubMed ID: 30724839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of OPD-Scan and Pentacam Parameters for Early Keratoconus Detection.
    Donoso R; Rodríguez Á; Esteffan K; Lagos C; Aránguiz D; Hernández N
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2021 Jun; 226():235-242. PubMed ID: 33529586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification.
    Kamiya K; Ishii R; Shimizu K; Igarashi A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 98(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 24457362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas.
    Huseynli S; Salgado-Borges J; Alio JL
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):521-534. PubMed ID: 29566542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of Corneal Pachymetry Distribution and Morphologic Changes in Subclinical Keratoconus with Normal Biomechanics.
    Song P; Yang K; Li P; Liu Y; Liang D; Ren S; Zeng Q
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():1748579. PubMed ID: 31828090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual, Topographic, and Pachymetric Effects of Pediatric Corneal Collagen Cross-linking.
    Toprak I; Yaylali V; Yildirim C
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2017 Mar; 54(2):84-89. PubMed ID: 27668869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early Tomographic Changes in the Eyes of Patients With Keratoconus.
    Shajari M; Jaffary I; Herrmann K; Grunwald C; Steinwender G; Mayer WJ; Kohnen T
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Apr; 34(4):254-259. PubMed ID: 29634840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinguishing Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus Eyes Using Combined Scheimpflug and Spectral-Domain OCT Analysis.
    Hwang ES; Perez-Straziota CE; Kim SW; Santhiago MR; Randleman JB
    Ophthalmology; 2018 Dec; 125(12):1862-1871. PubMed ID: 30055838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
    Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F
    Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus.
    Awad EA; Abou Samra WA; Torky MA; El-Kannishy AM
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):186. PubMed ID: 28985735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Characteristics of corneal topography in parents of keratoconus patients].
    Li J; Jing LL; Du XL
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 56(6):456-464. PubMed ID: 32842328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation in the Best Fit Sphere Radius of Curvature as a Test to Detect Keratoconus Progression on a Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomographer.
    Gupta N; Trindade BL; Hooshmand J; Chan E
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Apr; 34(4):260-263. PubMed ID: 29634841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of metrics for the detection of subclinical keratoconus in a new patient collective.
    Bühren J; Schäffeler T; Kohnen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Feb; 40(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 24360499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Topographic Evaluation of Unilateral Keratoconus Patients.
    Değirmenci C; Palamar M; İsmayilova N; Eğrilmez S; Yağcı A
    Turk J Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 49(3):117-122. PubMed ID: 31245968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data.
    Arbelaez MC; Versaci F; Vestri G; Barboni P; Savini G
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Nov; 119(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 22892148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A combination of topographic and pachymetric parameters in keratoconus diagnosis.
    Toprak I; Yaylalı V; Yildirim C
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Oct; 38(5):357-62. PubMed ID: 25936634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Brillouin Spectroscopy of Normal and Keratoconus Corneas.
    Seiler TG; Shao P; Eltony A; Seiler T; Yun SH
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 202():118-125. PubMed ID: 30772345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Combined Biomechanical and Tomographic Model for Identifying Cases of Subclinical Keratoconus.
    Atalay E; Özalp O; Erol MA; Bilgin M; Yıldırım N
    Cornea; 2020 Apr; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 31738245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.