198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29859119)
21. Prostate Cancer Detection with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 1 versus Version 2.
Feng ZY; Wang L; Min XD; Wang SG; Wang GP; Cai J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2016 Oct; 129(20):2451-2459. PubMed ID: 27748338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multiparametric transrectal ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer: novel scoring systems.
Chen T; Wang F; Chen H; Wang M; Liu P; Liu S; Zhou Y; Ma Q
BMC Urol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):64. PubMed ID: 35439952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biparametric prostate MRI and clinical indicators predict clinically significant prostate cancer in men with "gray zone" PSA levels.
Wei CG; Chen T; Zhang YY; Pan P; Dai GC; Yu HC; Yang S; Jiang Z; Tu J; Lu ZH; Shen JK; Zhao WL
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 127():108977. PubMed ID: 32330776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prostate Cancer Differentiation and Aggressiveness: Assessment With a Radiomic-Based Model vs. PI-RADS v2.
Chen T; Li M; Gu Y; Zhang Y; Yang S; Wei C; Wu J; Li X; Zhao W; Shen J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):875-884. PubMed ID: 30230108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinically insignificant prostate cancer suitable for active surveillance according to Prostate Cancer Research International: Active surveillance criteria: Utility of PI-RADS v2.
Yim JH; Kim CK; Kim JH
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Apr; 47(4):1072-1079. PubMed ID: 28901655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A nomogram based on PI-RADS v2.1 and clinical indicators for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in the transition zone.
Wei C; Pan P; Chen T; Zhang Y; Dai G; Tu J; Jiang Z; Zhao W; Shen J
Transl Androl Urol; 2021 Jun; 10(6):2435-2446. PubMed ID: 34295730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2) and periprostatic fat thickness on multi-parametric MRI to predict the presence of prostate cancer.
Cao Y; Cao M; Chen Y; Yu W; Fan Y; Liu Q; Gao G; Zhao Z; Wang X; Jin J
Oncotarget; 2017 Jul; 8(27):44040-44049. PubMed ID: 28476042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improving the detection rate of prostate cancer in the gray zone of PI-RADS v2 and serum tPSA by using prostate-specific antigen-age volume.
Lu YF; Zhang Q; Chen HY; Chen JY; Pan Y; Xu CC; Xu JX; Yu RS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(26):e16289. PubMed ID: 31261602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cutoff Values of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 Score in Men With Prostate-specific Antigen Level 4 to 10 ng/mL: Importance of Lesion Location.
Chen Y; Ruan M; Zhou B; Hu X; Wang H; Liu H; Liu J; Song G
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2021 Aug; 19(4):288-295. PubMed ID: 33632569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluating the performance of PI-RADS v2 in the non-academic setting.
Jordan EJ; Fiske C; Zagoria RJ; Westphalen AC
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Nov; 42(11):2725-2731. PubMed ID: 28451763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimizing prostate cancer accumulating model: combined PI-RADS v2 with prostate specific antigen and its derivative data.
Lu YF; Zhang Q; Yao WG; Chen HY; Chen JY; Xu CC; Yu RS
Cancer Imaging; 2019 May; 19(1):26. PubMed ID: 31122297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 1 and version 2 and combination with apparent diffusion coefficient as a predictor of biopsy outcome.
Ryznarová Z; Keller J; Záleský M; Zachoval R; Čapek V; Malikova H
Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2019 Mar; 40(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 31184822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Lesion volume predicts prostate cancer risk and aggressiveness: validation of its value alone and matched with prostate imaging reporting and data system score.
Martorana E; Pirola GM; Scialpi M; Micali S; Iseppi A; Bonetti LR; Kaleci S; Torricelli P; Bianchi G
BJU Int; 2017 Jul; 120(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 27608292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Detection of clinically signifi cant prostate cancer with PIRADS v2 scores, PSA density, and ADC values in regions with and without mpMRI visible lesions.
Westphalen AC; Fazel F; Nguyen H; Cabarrus M; Hanley-Knutson K; Shinohara K; Carroll PR
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):713-723. PubMed ID: 31136112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Construction and Validation of a Clinical Predictive Nomogram for Improving the Cancer Detection of Prostate Naive Biopsy Based on Chinese Multicenter Clinical Data.
Tao T; Wang C; Liu W; Yuan L; Ge Q; Zhang L; He B; Wang L; Wang L; Xiang C; Wang H; Chen S; Xiao J
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():811866. PubMed ID: 35127526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical utility of PSAD combined with PI-RADS category for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Stevens E; Truong M; Bullen JA; Ward RD; Purysko AS; Klein EA
Urol Oncol; 2020 Nov; 38(11):846.e9-846.e16. PubMed ID: 32576527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Prospective Accuracy Study of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With Whole-mount Pathology.
Giannarini G; Girometti R; Crestani A; Rossanese M; Calandriello M; Cereser L; Bednarova S; Battistella C; Sioletic S; Zuiani C; Valotto C; Ficarra V
Urology; 2019 Jan; 123():191-197. PubMed ID: 30273613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Machine learning-based radiomics model to predict benign and malignant PI-RADS v2.1 category 3 lesions: a retrospective multi-center study.
Jin P; Shen J; Yang L; Zhang J; Shen A; Bao J; Wang X
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Mar; 23(1):47. PubMed ID: 36991347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical and prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging findings as predictors of general and clinically significant prostate cancer risk: A retrospective single-center study.
Massanova M; Vere R; Robertson S; Crocetto F; Barone B; Dutto L; Ahmad I; Underwood M; Salmond J; Patel A; Celentano G; Bhatt JR
Curr Urol; 2023 Sep; 17(3):147-152. PubMed ID: 37448611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
