202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29859350)
1. The cost effectiveness of minimally invasive spine surgery in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: a comparison of transpsoas and open techniques.
Swamy G; Lopatina E; Thomas KC; Marshall DA; Johal HS
Spine J; 2019 Feb; 19(2):339-348. PubMed ID: 29859350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Minimally Invasive versus Open Surgery Techniques for Lumbar Spinal Fusion in Italy and the United Kingdom.
Vertuani S; Nilsson J; Borgman B; Buseghin G; Leonard C; Assietti R; Quraishi NA
Value Health; 2015 Sep; 18(6):810-6. PubMed ID: 26409608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between Open Transforaminal and Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusions Using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio at 2-Year Follow-up.
Gandhoke GS; Shin HM; Chang YF; Tempel Z; Gerszten PC; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
Neurosurgery; 2016 Apr; 78(4):585-95. PubMed ID: 26726969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis.
Dakwar E; Cardona RF; Smith DA; Uribe JS
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Mar; 28(3):E8. PubMed ID: 20192668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost minimization in treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.
Uddin OM; Haque R; Sugrue PA; Ahmed YM; El Ahmadieh TY; Press JM; Koski T; Fessler RG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Dec; 23(6):798-806. PubMed ID: 26315955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incremental cost-effectiveness of adult spinal deformity surgery: observed quality-adjusted life years with surgery compared with predicted quality-adjusted life years without surgery.
McCarthy I; O'Brien M; Ames C; Robinson C; Errico T; Polly DW; Hostin R;
Neurosurg Focus; 2014 May; 36(5):E3. PubMed ID: 24785485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complications and radiographic correction in adult scoliosis following combined transpsoas extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior pedicle screw instrumentation.
Tormenti MJ; Maserati MB; Bonfield CM; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Mar; 28(3):E7. PubMed ID: 20192667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stand-alone minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion: multicenter clinical outcomes.
Ahmadian A; Bach K; Bolinger B; Malham GM; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Uribe JS
J Clin Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 22(4):740-6. PubMed ID: 25684343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 22120269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion for adult degenerative scoliosis with 1 or 2 dislocated levels.
Flouzat-Lachaniette CH; Ratte L; Poignard A; Auregan JC; Queinnec S; Hernigou P; Allain J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Dec; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 26315959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparative effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Zuckerman SL; Godil SS; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
World Neurosurg; 2014; 82(1-2):230-8. PubMed ID: 23321379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Seven-year cost-effectiveness of ProDisc-C total disc replacement: results from investigational device exemption and post-approval studies.
Radcliff K; Lerner J; Yang C; Bernard T; Zigler JE
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26824587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a technique and feasibility study.
Anand N; Baron EM; Thaiyananthan G; Khalsa K; Goldstein TB
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Oct; 21(7):459-67. PubMed ID: 18836355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: perioperative outcomes and complications.
Isaacs RE; Hyde J; Goodrich JA; Rodgers WB; Phillips FM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Dec; 35(26 Suppl):S322-30. PubMed ID: 21160396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is minimal access spine surgery more cost-effective than conventional spine surgery?
Lubelski D; Mihalovich KE; Skelly AC; Fehlings MG; Harrop JS; Mummaneni PV; Wang MY; Steinmetz MP
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(22 Suppl 1):S65-74. PubMed ID: 25299261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mid-term to long-term clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adults with scoliosis.
Anand N; Rosemann R; Khalsa B; Baron EM
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Mar; 28(3):E6. PubMed ID: 20192666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness analysis in minimally invasive spine surgery.
Al-Khouja LT; Baron EM; Johnson JP; Kim TT; Drazin D
Neurosurg Focus; 2014 Jun; 36(6):E4. PubMed ID: 24881636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
