These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29860717)

  • 41. Researchers, authors and reviewers: what are our responsibilities?
    Kramer MS
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2012 Jul; 26(4):308-9. PubMed ID: 22686381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry editorial policies and ethical guidelines.
    Roth KA
    J Histochem Cytochem; 2006 Feb; 54(2):129-30. PubMed ID: 16418501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Being a Great Reviewer: Remembering the "Why".
    Moliterno DJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(20):2130-2131. PubMed ID: 30336820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Writing the abstract: completeness and accuracy matter.
    von Elm E
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Jul; 28(7):483-4. PubMed ID: 21659806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Journals lack explicit policies for separating eds from ads.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7033):549. PubMed ID: 15800585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology: premium space!
    Gilchrest BA
    J Invest Dermatol; 2012 Dec; 132(12):2671. PubMed ID: 23187104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Investigation of scientific fraud. Statements from the Swedish Research Council not sufficiently normative].
    Werkö L
    Lakartidningen; 2006 Oct 25-31; 103(43):3288-91. PubMed ID: 17117661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The ARRIVE guidelines: a resource for authors and reviewers to ensure that submissions to The Veterinary Journal meet minimal expectations of completeness, accuracy and transparency.
    Blomme EA
    Vet J; 2011 Sep; 189(3):237-8. PubMed ID: 21924210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Medwave’s editorial history, policies and guidelines: 2. Editorial policies.
    Bachelet VC
    Medwave; 2017 Apr; 17(3):e6909. PubMed ID: 28430770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Peer review and appeal: flawed but trusted?
    Pravinkumar E
    Lancet; 2003 Aug; 362(9385):747. PubMed ID: 12957106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Medical journals and the science of peer review: raising the standard.
    Callaham ML; Waeckerle JF
    Ann Emerg Med; 1996 Jul; 28(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 8669742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Ethics: Predatory Publishing: Keeping the Wolves from Your Office Door.
    Merkle Sorrell J; Owens JK
    Online J Issues Nurs; 2015 Aug; 20(3):9. PubMed ID: 26882518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. On Strengthening the MCP Editorial Leadership.
    Burlingame AL
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2016 Jul; 15(7):2214-6. PubMed ID: 27281785
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors.
    Allison DB; Brown AW; George BJ; Kaiser KA
    Nature; 2016 Feb; 530(7588):27-9. PubMed ID: 26842041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The ATS Journals' policy on image manipulation.
    Abraham E; Adler KB; Shapiro SD; Leff AR
    Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol; 2008 Nov; 39(5):499. PubMed ID: 18927351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Ethics of guidelines for reviewers of medical manuscripts.
    Minion D; Sorial E; Endean E
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):391-3. PubMed ID: 17664118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Peer Review - Essential for Article and Journal Scientific Assessment and Validity.
    Masic I
    Med Arch; 2016 Jun; 70(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 27594739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Variations in Instructed vs. Published Word Counts in Top Five Medical Journals.
    Silverberg O; Ray JG
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Jan; 33(1):16-18. PubMed ID: 28971304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [How I review an original scientific paper].
    Hoppin FG
    Rev Mal Respir; 2003 Nov; 20(5 Pt 1):671-8. PubMed ID: 14631245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Editorial: peer reviewers make it all possible at Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®.
    Leopold SS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3693-4. PubMed ID: 26463568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.