These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29861545)

  • 1. Supporting child witnesses during identification lineups: Exploring the effectiveness of registered intermediaries.
    Wilcock R; Crane L; Hobson Z; Nash G; Kirke-Smith M; Henry LA
    Appl Cogn Psychol; 2018; 32(3):367-375. PubMed ID: 29861545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eyewitness Identification: Live, Photo, and Video Lineups.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Price HL; Valentine T
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 2018 Aug; 24(3):307-325. PubMed ID: 30100702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Absolute-judgment models better predict eyewitness decision-making than do relative-judgment models.
    Smith AM; Ying RC; Goldstein AR; Fitzgerald RJ
    Cognition; 2024 Jul; 251():105877. PubMed ID: 39002429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do masked-face lineups facilitate eyewitness identification of a masked individual?
    Manley KD; Chan JCK; Wells GL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Sep; 25(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 30556719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The aging eyewitness: effects of age on face, delay, and source-memory ability.
    Memon A; Bartlett J; Rose R; Gray C
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2003 Nov; 58(6):P338-45. PubMed ID: 14614118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects.
    Jones JM; Katzman J; Kovera MB
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1233782. PubMed ID: 38680285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The importance of decision bias for predicting eyewitness lineup choices: toward a Lineup Skills Test.
    Baldassari MJ; Kantner J; Lindsay DS
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Jan; 4(1):2. PubMed ID: 30693377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing witness performance in the field versus the lab: How real-world conditions affect eyewitness decision-making.
    Eisen ML; Ying RC; Chui C; Swaby MA
    Law Hum Behav; 2022 Jun; 46(3):175-188. PubMed ID: 35604705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of experimenter familiarity in children's eyewitness identification.
    Calderwood L; Ballantyne C; Slee K
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2024; 31(2):147-160. PubMed ID: 38628252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The effect of suggestibility on eyewitness identifications: A comparison between showups and lineups].
    Miura H; Itoh Y
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2016 Apr; 87(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 27180511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the possible advantages of combining small lineups with instructions that discourage guessing-based selection.
    Therre A; Bell R; Menne NM; Mayer C; Lichtenhagen U; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14126. PubMed ID: 38898071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enabling witnesses to actively explore faces and reinstate study-test pose during a lineup increases discriminability.
    Meyer M; Colloff MF; Bennett TC; Hirata E; Kohl A; Stevens LM; Smith HMJ; Staudigl T; Flowe HD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Oct; 120(41):e2301845120. PubMed ID: 37782811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of repeated lineups and delay on eyewitness identification.
    Lin W; Strube MJ; Roediger HL
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Jun; 4(1):16. PubMed ID: 31197495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Active exploration of faces in police lineups increases discrimination accuracy.
    Colloff MF; Flowe HD; Smith HMJ; Seale-Carlisle TM; Meissner CA; Rockey JC; Pande B; Kujur P; Parveen N; Chandel P; Singh MM; Pradhan S; Parganiha A
    Am Psychol; 2022; 77(2):196-220. PubMed ID: 34793182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating lineup fairness: Variations across methods and measures.
    Mansour JK; Beaudry JL; Kalmet N; Bertrand MI; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Feb; 41(1):103-115. PubMed ID: 27685644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Children's identification of faces from lineups: the effects of lineup presentation and instructions on accuracy.
    Beresford J; Blades M
    J Appl Psychol; 2006 Sep; 91(5):1102-13. PubMed ID: 16953771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors of eyewitness identification decisions from video lineups in England: a field study.
    Horry R; Memon A; Wright DB; Milne R
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Aug; 36(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 22849411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancing lineup identification accuracy: two codes are better than one.
    Melara RD; DeWitt-Rickards TS; O'Brien TP
    J Appl Psychol; 1989 Oct; 74(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 2793771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.