These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29862345)

  • 1. Data gathering ability contributes to visual organization and probabilistic reasoning.
    Bernadyn T; Feigenson KA
    Heliyon; 2018 Mar; 4(3):e00582. PubMed ID: 29862345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Need for closure, jumping to conclusions, and decisiveness in delusion-prone individuals.
    McKay R; Langdon R; Coltheart M
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2006 Jun; 194(6):422-6. PubMed ID: 16772859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Jumping to conclusions and the continuum of delusional beliefs.
    Warman DM; Lysaker PH; Martin JM; Davis L; Haudenschield SL
    Behav Res Ther; 2007 Jun; 45(6):1255-69. PubMed ID: 17052687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Jumping to conclusions and paranoid ideation in the general population.
    Freeman D; Pugh K; Garety P
    Schizophr Res; 2008 Jul; 102(1-3):254-60. PubMed ID: 18442898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reasoning biases in delusion-prone individuals.
    Linney YM; Peters ER; Ayton P
    Br J Clin Psychol; 1998 Sep; 37(3):285-302. PubMed ID: 9784884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Jumping to conclusions" in delusion-prone participants: an experimental economics approach.
    van der Leer L; McKay R
    Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2014; 19(3):257-67. PubMed ID: 24313625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of effective connectivity between the task-positive and task-negative network for evidence gathering [Evidence gathering and connectivity].
    Andreou C; Steinmann S; Kolbeck K; Rauh J; Leicht G; Moritz S; Mulert C
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():49-56. PubMed ID: 29471098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Delusion proneness and 'jumping to conclusions': relative and absolute effects.
    van der Leer L; Hartig B; Goldmanis M; McKay R
    Psychol Med; 2015 Apr; 45(6):1253-62. PubMed ID: 25272196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on different behaviors: one- and two-handed grasping; one- and two-handed manual estimation; metric and comparative judgment.
    Vishton PM; Fabre E
    Spat Vis; 2003; 16(3-4):377-92. PubMed ID: 12858958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probability misjudgment, cognitive ability, and belief in the paranormal.
    Musch J; Ehrenberg K
    Br J Psychol; 2002 May; 93(Pt 2):169-77. PubMed ID: 12031145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Jumping to conclusions style along the continuum of delusions: delusion-prone individuals are not hastier in decision making than healthy individuals.
    So SH; Kwok NT
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121347. PubMed ID: 25793772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Need for closure and jumping-to-conclusions in delusion-prone individuals.
    Colbert SM; Peters ER
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2002 Jan; 190(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 11838027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Jumping to conclusions and delusion proneness: the impact of emotionally salient stimuli.
    Warman DM; Martin JM
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2006 Oct; 194(10):760-5. PubMed ID: 17041288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Belief-bias reasoning in non-clinical delusion-prone individuals.
    Anandakumar T; Connaughton E; Coltheart M; Langdon R
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Sep; 56():71-78. PubMed ID: 28318497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reasoning, delusion proneness and stress: an experimental investigation.
    Keefe KM; Warman DM
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2011; 18(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 20146200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Reference Ability Neural Network Study: Life-time stability of reference-ability neural networks derived from task maps of young adults.
    Habeck C; Gazes Y; Razlighi Q; Steffener J; Brickman A; Barulli D; Salthouse T; Stern Y
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():693-704. PubMed ID: 26522424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Belief-bias reasoning in non-clinical delusion-prone individuals.
    Anandakumar T; Connaughton E; Coltheart M; Langdon R
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2017 Mar; 54():211-218. PubMed ID: 27614050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reasoning and delusion proneness: confidence in decisions.
    Warman DM
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2008 Jan; 196(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 18195636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying the Ebbinghaus figure effect: target size, context size, and target-context distance determine the presence and direction of the illusion.
    Knol H; Huys R; Sarrazin JC; Jirsa VK
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1679. PubMed ID: 26583002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analytic cognitive style, not delusional ideation, predicts data gathering in a large beads task study.
    Ross RM; Pennycook G; McKay R; Gervais WM; Langdon R; Coltheart M
    Cogn Neuropsychiatry; 2016 Jul; 21(4):300-314. PubMed ID: 27341507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.