These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29863738)

  • 1. Writing Across the Curriculum: Reliability Testing of a Standardized Rubric.
    Minnich M; Kirkpatrick AJ; Goodman JT; Whittaker A; Stanton Chapple H; Schoening AM; Khanna MM
    J Nurs Educ; 2018 Jun; 57(6):366-370. PubMed ID: 29863738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concordance Within an RN to BSN Program: Standardized Writing Assessment Rubrics.
    Abbott MRB; Shaw P
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2019; 40(6):372-373. PubMed ID: 29994895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nursing Faculty Development: Building a Common Grading Rubric to Evaluate Writing.
    Singleterry L; Kalkman B; Chrenka L; Courtright-Nash D
    Nurse Educ; 2016; 41(5):222-4. PubMed ID: 27088258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Righting writing: strategies for improving nursing student papers.
    Bickes JT; Schim SM
    Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2010; 7():Article8. PubMed ID: 20196767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using the Clark Simulation Evaluation Rubric with associate degree and baccalaureate nursing students.
    Gantt LT
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2010; 31(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 20455367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Standardized Clinical Performance Grading Rubric: Reliability Assessment.
    Kopp ML
    J Nurs Educ; 2018 Sep; 57(9):544-548. PubMed ID: 30148516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systems Thinking for Transitions of Care: Reliability Testing for a Standardized Rubric.
    Phillips JM; Stalter AM; Ruggiero JS; Bonnett PL; Brodhead J; Merriam DH; Scardaville DL; Wiggs CM; Winegardner S
    Clin Nurse Spec; 2019; 33(3):128-135. PubMed ID: 30946110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fostering and evaluating reflective capacity in medical education: developing the REFLECT rubric for assessing reflective writing.
    Wald HS; Borkan JM; Taylor JS; Anthony D; Reis SP
    Acad Med; 2012 Jan; 87(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 22104060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Developing a practical evaluation tool for preceptor use.
    Walsh CM; Seldomridge LA; Badros KK
    Nurse Educ; 2008; 33(3):113-7. PubMed ID: 18453927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Development and Preliminary Validation of a Rubric to Assess Medical Students' Written Summary Statements in Virtual Patient Cases.
    Smith S; Kogan JR; Berman NB; Dell MS; Brock DM; Robins LS
    Acad Med; 2016 Jan; 91(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 26726864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current State of Test Development, Administration, and Analysis: A Study of Faculty Practices.
    Bristol TJ; Nelson JW; Sherrill KJ; Wangerin VS
    Nurse Educ; 2018; 43(2):68-72. PubMed ID: 28817472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Norming a Written Communication Rubric in a Graduate Health Science Course.
    Turbow DJ; Werner TP; Lowe E; Vu HQ
    J Allied Health; 2016; 45(3):e37-42. PubMed ID: 27585624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A descriptive study of a clinical evaluation tool and process: student and faculty perspectives.
    Krautscheid L; Moceri J; Stragnell S; Manthey L; Neal T
    J Nurs Educ; 2014 Mar; 53(3):S30-3. PubMed ID: 24512331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Rubric to Assess Students' Clinical Reasoning When Encountering Virtual Patients.
    Georg C; Karlgren K; Ulfvarson J; Jirwe M; Welin E
    J Nurs Educ; 2018 Jul; 57(7):408-415. PubMed ID: 29958310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating Scientific Writing Skill in DNP Program Students.
    DeCoux Hampton M; Chafetz L
    Nurse Educ; 2021 May-Jun 01; 46(3):164-169. PubMed ID: 32658087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of a Writing Rubric: A Failed Research Study Yielding Positive Results.
    Kruse GL; Baylor SL; Thomson PD; Wagner PL; Doughty AS
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2021 Jan/Feb 01; 42(1):56-58. PubMed ID: 31335492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Professional writing in nursing education: creating an academic-community writing center.
    Latham CL; Ahern N
    J Nurs Educ; 2013 Nov; 52(11):615-20. PubMed ID: 24127176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of the Creighton Tool During a Home Visit Simulation Experience.
    Livsey KR
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2016; 37(5):283-284. PubMed ID: 27740562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the competences associated with a nursing Bachelor thesis by means of rubrics.
    Llaurado-Serra M; Rodríguez E; Gallart A; Fuster P; Monforte-Royo C; De Juan MÁ
    Nurse Educ Today; 2018 Jul; 66():103-109. PubMed ID: 29698874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evaluation of reflective learning from the nursing student's point of view: A mixed method approach.
    Fernández-Peña R; Fuentes-Pumarola C; Malagón-Aguilera MC; Bonmatí-Tomàs A; Bosch-Farré C; Ballester-Ferrando D
    Nurse Educ Today; 2016 Sep; 44():59-65. PubMed ID: 27429330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.