These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
441 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29865044)
1. Three-dimensional shear wave elastography for differentiation of breast lesions: An initial study with quantitative analysis using three orthogonal planes. Wang Q; Li XL; He YP; Alizad A; Chen S; Zhao CK; Guo LH; Bo XW; Ren WW; Zhou BG; Xu HX Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 71(3):311-324. PubMed ID: 29865044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of 3D and 2D shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses: focus on the diagnostic performance. Choi HY; Sohn YM; Seo M Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):878-886. PubMed ID: 28526455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: comparison with two-dimensional shear-wave elastography. Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Chung J; Kim JA; Kim EK Eur Radiol; 2013 Jun; 23(6):1519-27. PubMed ID: 23212276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combination of two-dimensional shear wave elastography with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system in the diagnosis of breast lesions: a new method to increase the diagnostic performance. Li DD; Xu HX; Guo LH; Bo XW; Li XL; Wu R; Xu JM; Zhang YF; Zhang K Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3290-300. PubMed ID: 26714967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of standard breast ultrasonography by adding two-dimensional and three-dimensional shear wave elastography: a prospective, multicenter trial. Xu J; Zhang L; Wen W; He Y; Wei T; Zheng Y; Pan X; Li Y; Wu Y; Dong F; Zhang H; Cheng W; Xu H; Zhang Y; Bao L; Zhang X; Tang S; Liao J; Luo H; Zhao H; Tian J; Peng Y Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):945-956. PubMed ID: 37644151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of 3D and 2D quantitative shear wave elastography (SWE) to differentiate between benign and malignant breast masses. Tian J; Liu Q; Wang X; Xing P; Yang Z; Wu C Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():41216. PubMed ID: 28106134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions. Shi XQ; Li JL; Wan WB; Huang Y Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):960-6. PubMed ID: 25701532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3-Dimensional shear wave elastography of breast lesions: Added value of color patterns with emphasis on crater sign of coronal plane. Chen YL; Chang C; Zeng W; Wang F; Chen JJ; Qu N Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Sep; 95(39):e4877. PubMed ID: 27684820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differential Diagnosis of Breast Category 3 and 4 Nodules Through BI-RADS Classification in Conjunction with Shear Wave Elastography. Wang M; Yang Z; Liu C; Yan J; Zhang W; Sun J; Cui G Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 43(3):601-606. PubMed ID: 27988221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, combined with B-mode ultrasonography: qualitative and quantitative assessments. Youk JH; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim H; Park YJ; Kim JA Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 40(10):2336-44. PubMed ID: 25130444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative evaluation of peripheral tissue elasticity for ultrasound-detected breast lesions. Xiao Y; Yu Y; Niu L; Qian M; Deng Z; Qiu W; Zheng H Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):896-904. PubMed ID: 27349474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic value of commercially available shear-wave elastography for breast cancers: integration into BI-RADS classification with subcategories of category 4. Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Han KH; Kim JA Eur Radiol; 2013 Oct; 23(10):2695-704. PubMed ID: 23652850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic performance of 2D-shear wave elastography in the diagnosis of breast cancer: a clinical appraisal of cutoff values. Bartolotta TV; Orlando AAM; Dimarco M; Zarcaro C; Ferraro F; Cirino A; Matranga D; Vieni S; Cabibi D Radiol Med; 2022 Nov; 127(11):1209-1220. PubMed ID: 36114930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combination of Quantitative Parameters of Shear Wave Elastography and Superb Microvascular Imaging to Evaluate Breast Masses. Lee EJ; Chang YW Korean J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 21(9):1045-1054. PubMed ID: 32691540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Utilizing size-based thresholds of stiffness gradient to reclassify BI-RADS category 3-4b lesions increases diagnostic performance. Shang J; Ruan LT; Wang YY; Zhang XJ; Dang Y; Liu B; Wang WL; Song Y; Chang SJ Clin Radiol; 2019 Apr; 74(4):306-313. PubMed ID: 30755314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison and Combination of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography of Breast Masses for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions by Quantitative Assessment: Preliminary Study. Seo M; Ahn HS; Park SH; Lee JB; Choi BI; Sohn YM; Shin SY J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 28688156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Diagnostic Significance of the BI-RADS Classification Combined With Automated Breast Volume Scanner and Shear Wave Elastography for Breast Lesions. Ren T; Li X; Xiang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang M; Zhang C J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Jul; 42(7):1459-1469. PubMed ID: 36534583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography of breast lesions: Comparison of two different systems. Ren WW; Li XL; He YP; Li DD; Wang D; Zhao CK; Bo XW; Liu BJ; Yue WW; Xu HX Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 28211807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of tumor size measurement: comparison of B-mode ultrasound, strain elastography, and 2D and 3D shear wave elastography with histopathological lesion size. Farrokh A; Maass N; Treu L; Heilmann T; Schäfer FK Acta Radiol; 2019 Apr; 60(4):451-458. PubMed ID: 30043622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]