These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29865097)

  • 1. A study of the real-world noise attenuation of the current hearing protection devices in typical workplaces using Field Microphone in Real Ear method.
    Aliabadi M; Biabani A; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
    Work; 2018; 60(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 29865097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing Protection Devices Based on Microphone in Real Ear.
    Biabani A; Aliabadi M; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
    Saf Health Work; 2017 Dec; 8(4):364-370. PubMed ID: 29276635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic Performance of 3D Printed Nanocomposite Earmuff.
    Ahmadi S; Nassiri P; Ghasemi I; Monazzam Ep MR
    Glob J Health Sci; 2015 May; 8(1):180-8. PubMed ID: 26234977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Attenuation of earmuffs used simultaneously with respiratory protective devices].
    Kozłowski E; Młyński R
    Med Pr; 2017 May; 68(3):349-361. PubMed ID: 28512363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Noise attenuation of hearing protectors against heavy weapon noise.
    Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K; Savolainen S; Myllyniemi J; Hämäläinen E
    Mil Med; 2000 Sep; 165(9):678-82. PubMed ID: 11011540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The difference in protection efficiency between earplugs and earmuffs. An investigation performed at a workplace.
    Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
    Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(4):215-21. PubMed ID: 7466283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attenuation characteristics of an extended-wear hearing aid: Impulse and continuous noise.
    Brungart DS; Spencer NJ; Pryor N; Abouzahra N; McKenna EA; Iyer N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Sep; 148(3):1404. PubMed ID: 33003895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficiency of ear protectors in laboratory and real life tests.
    Pawlas K; Grzesik J
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 1990; 62(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 2379964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real-ear attenuation of earmuffs in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals.
    Suter AH; Lempert BL; Franks JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 May; 87(5):2114-7. PubMed ID: 2348018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.
    Ravicz ME; Melcher JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):216-31. PubMed ID: 11206150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of wearing an anti-flash hood on the noise attenuation of earmuffs.
    Paddan GS; Lower MC
    Ind Health; 2021 Sep; 59(4):204-219. PubMed ID: 33692247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An acoustic head simulator for hearing protector evaluation. II: Measurements in steady-state and impulse noise environments.
    Giguère C; Kunov H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Mar; 85(3):1197-205. PubMed ID: 2708666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
    Chiu CC; Wan TJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The performance of circumaural hearing protectors by dosimetry.
    Chung DY; Hardie R; Gannon RP
    J Occup Med; 1983 Sep; 25(9):679-82. PubMed ID: 6631567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A controlled investigation of in-field attenuation performance of selected insert, earmuff, and canal cap hearing protectors.
    Park MY; Casali JG
    Hum Factors; 1991 Dec; 33(6):693-714. PubMed ID: 1800294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low-Cost Earmuff Shown to Significantly Reduce Cast-Saw Noise.
    Baes T; Ludwigsen D; Sardelli M; Atkinson P; Atkinson TS
    Orthop Nurs; 2021 Jul-Aug 01; 40(4):240-245. PubMed ID: 34397979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices.
    Berger EH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Jun; 79(6):1655-87. PubMed ID: 3522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the hearing protector in a real work situation using the field-microphone-in-real-ear method.
    Rocha CH; Longo IA; Moreira RR; Samelli AG
    Codas; 2016 Apr; 28(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 27191871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.