These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29865097)

  • 21. The impact of hearing protection on sound localization and orienting behavior.
    Simpson BD; Bolia RS; McKinley RL; Brungart DS
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):188-98. PubMed ID: 15960096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Systematic Evaluation of the Relationship between Physical and Psychoacoustical Measurements of Hearing Protectors' Attenuation.
    Nélisse H; Le Cocq C; Boutin J; Laville F; Voix J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(12):829-44. PubMed ID: 26023884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A simple, cost-effective, and novel method for determining the efficiency of industrial and commercial noise-canceling earmuffs.
    Zangari S; Mirowsky JE
    Noise Health; 2019; 21(100):108-115. PubMed ID: 32655064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of frequency component content on the selection result of hearing protectors.
    Kozłowski E; Młyński R
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2021 Dec; 27(4):1005-1018. PubMed ID: 33533703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attenuation of peak sound pressure levels of shooting noise by hearing protective earmuffs.
    Lenzuni P; Sangiorgi T; Cerini L
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(58):91-9. PubMed ID: 22718106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attenuation of high-level impulses by earmuffs.
    Zera J; Mlynski R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2082-96. PubMed ID: 17902846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Industrial impulse noise, crest factor and the effect of earmuffs.
    Pekkarinen J
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Oct; 48(10):861-6. PubMed ID: 3687731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Comparison of knowledge and behavior toward hearing protection among workers in different workplaces and its influence factors].
    Yang M; Ou ZZ; Yang M; He P; He DK; Chen HQ; Liao XQ
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 36(6):413-415. PubMed ID: 30248733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The efficiency of earmuffs against impulse noise from firearms.
    Ylikoski J; Pekkarinen J; Starck J
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 3629173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Selection of Earmuffs and Other Personal Protective Equipment Used in Combination.
    Kozlowski E; Mlynski R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Apr; 16(9):. PubMed ID: 31027325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Localization of Vehicle Back-Up Alarms by Users of Level-Dependent Hearing Protectors under Industrial Noise Conditions Generated at a Forge.
    Mlynski R; Kozlowski E
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 30704136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impulse noise and hand-arm vibration in relation to sensory neural hearing loss.
    Starck J; Pekkarinen J; Pyykkö I
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1988 Aug; 14(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 3175560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effectiveness of hearing protective devices.
    Gosztonyi RE
    J Occup Med; 1975 Sep; 17(9):569-80. PubMed ID: 1165499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Physical characteristics of gunfire impulse noise and its attenuation by hearing protectors.
    Ylikoski M; Pekkarinen JO; Starck JP; Pääkkönen RJ; Ylikoski JS
    Scand Audiol; 1995; 24(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 7761796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of hearing protection used by police officers in the shooting range.
    Guida HL; Taxini CL; Gonçalves CG; Valenti VE
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2014; 80(6):515-21. PubMed ID: 25457072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Amplified earmuffs: impact on speech intelligibility in industrial noise for listeners with hearing loss.
    Dolan TG; O'Loughlin D
    Am J Audiol; 2005 Jun; 14(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 16180971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of industrial use on the acoustical performance of some earmuffs.
    Rawlinson RD; Wheeler PD
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1987; 31(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 3426029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part II: Modeling the external ear, simulating bone conduction, and comparing test fixture and real-ear data.
    Schroeter J; Poesselt C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):505-27. PubMed ID: 3745683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The acoustical attenuation of some combinations of earplugs and earmuffs.
    Rawlinson RD; Wheeler PD; Custard G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1987; 31(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 3426030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The role of information and training for workers on the correct use of earplugs in assessing real noise attenuation with E-A-RfitTM system].
    Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Germano C; Dentamaro A; Di Lorenzo L
    Med Lav; 2015 Jul; 106(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 26154471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.