192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29866412)
1. Are intraoral radiographs reliable in determining peri-implant marginal bone level changes? The correlation between open surgical measurements and peri-apical radiographs.
Cassetta M; Di Giorgio R; Barbato E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1358-1364. PubMed ID: 29866412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Are Intraoral Radiographs Accurate in Determining the Peri-implant Marginal Bone Level?
Cassetta M; Di Giorgio R; Barbato E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):847-852. PubMed ID: 30025001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiographic follow-up analysis of Brånemark dental implants.
Pikner SS
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (194):5-69, 2. PubMed ID: 18652086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peri-implant bone loss around platform-switched Morse taper connection implants: a prospective 60-month follow-up study.
Cassetta M; Driver A; Brandetti G; Calasso S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec; 45(12):1577-1585. PubMed ID: 27692898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intra-surgical vs. radiographic bone level assessments in measuring peri-implant bone loss.
Serino G; Sato H; Holmes P; Turri A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1396-1400. PubMed ID: 28009061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early peri-implant bone loss: a prospective cohort study.
Cassetta M; Pranno N; Calasso S; Di Mambro A; Giansanti M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 44(9):1138-45. PubMed ID: 26008731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants supporting mandibular overdentures.
Batenburg RH; Meijer HJ; Geraets WG; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 9780899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Prospective Multicenter Study on Radiographic Crestal Bone Changes Around Dental Implants Placed at Crestal or Subcrestal Level: One-Year Findings.
Gatti C; Gatti F; Silvestri M; Mintrone F; Rossi R; Tridondani G; Piacentini G; Borrelli P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):913-918. PubMed ID: 30025009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of methods to assess marginal bone height around endosseous implants.
Meijer HJ; Steen WH; Bosman F
J Clin Periodontol; 1993 Apr; 20(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 8473534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of peripheral marginal bone loss at dental implants measured with conventional intraoral film and digitized radiographs.
Kamburoğlu K; Gülşahı A; Genç Y; Paksoy CS
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 20712442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrospective radiographic observational study of 1692 Straumann tissue-level dental implants over 10 years. II. Marginal bone stability.
Kang MH; Jung UW; Cho KS; Lee JS
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 20(5):875-881. PubMed ID: 30048038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Follow-up study of implants with turned or oxidized surfaces placed after sinus augmentation.
Jungner M; Legrell PE; Lundgren S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1380-7. PubMed ID: 25397801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiologic study of marginal bone loss around 108 dental implants and its relationship to smoking, implant location, and morphology.
Peñarrocha M; Palomar M; Sanchis JM; Guarinos J; Balaguer J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):861-7. PubMed ID: 15623062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of two dental implant macrostructures on peri-implant bone loss: a comparative, retrospective study.
Dagorne C; Malet J; Bizouard G; Mora F; Rangé H; Bouchard P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Mar; 26(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 25376741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles.
Mengel R; Kruse B; Flores-de-Jacoby L
J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1234-41. PubMed ID: 16805688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Crestal bone resorption in augmented bone using mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft or pristine bone during submerged implant healing: a prospective study in humans.
Huang HY; Ogata Y; Hanley J; Finkelman M; Hur Y
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Feb; 27(2):e25-30. PubMed ID: 25385544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of radiographic and histological assessment of peri-implant bone around oral implants.
Stokholm R; Spin-Neto R; Nyengaard JR; Isidor F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Jul; 27(7):782-6. PubMed ID: 26407918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effect of Interimplant Distance on Peri-implant Bone and Soft Tissue Dimensional Changes: A Nonrandomized, Prospective, 2-Year Follow-up Study.
Koutouzis T; Neiva R; Lipton D; Lundgren T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(4):900-8. PubMed ID: 26252042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peri-implant soft tissue and bone crest alterations at fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year prospective study.
Chang M; Wennström JL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 May; 21(5):527-34. PubMed ID: 20443804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning.
Sbordone L; Levin L; Guidetti F; Sbordone C; Glikman A; Schwartz-Arad D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 May; 22(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 21087315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
