These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29866429)

  • 41. But they weren't being careful! Role of theory of mind in moral judgments about victim and transgressor negligence.
    Gönültaş S; Richardson CB; Mulvey KL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2021 Dec; 212():105234. PubMed ID: 34325352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Hunger Bias or Gut Instinct? Responses to Judgments of Harm Depending on Visceral State Versus Intuitive Decision-Making.
    Brown H; Proulx MJ; Stanton Fraser D
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2261. PubMed ID: 33041900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. When ignorance is no excuse: Different roles for intent across moral domains.
    Young L; Saxe R
    Cognition; 2011 Aug; 120(2):202-14. PubMed ID: 21601839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Tainting the soul: purity concerns predict moral judgments of suicide.
    Rottman J; Kelemen D; Young L
    Cognition; 2014 Feb; 130(2):217-26. PubMed ID: 24333538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Are children moral objectivists? Children's judgments about moral and response-dependent properties.
    Nichols S; Folds-Bennett T
    Cognition; 2003 Dec; 90(2):B23-32. PubMed ID: 14599758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Valence framing effects on moral judgments: A meta-analysis.
    McDonald K; Graves R; Yin S; Weese T; Sinnott-Armstrong W
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104703. PubMed ID: 33965894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Being hurt and hurting others: children's narrative accounts and moral judgments of their own interpersonal conflicts.
    Wainryb C; Brehl BA; Matwin S
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2005; 70(3):1-114. PubMed ID: 16359348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A dose of ruthlessness: interpersonal moral judgment is hardened by the anti-anxiety drug lorazepam.
    Perkins AM; Leonard AM; Weaver K; Dalton JA; Mehta MA; Kumari V; Williams SC; Ettinger U
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Aug; 142(3):612-20. PubMed ID: 23025561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. How Large Is the Role of Emotion in Judgments of Moral Dilemmas?
    Horne Z; Powell D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0154780. PubMed ID: 27385365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. No Absolutism Here: Harm Predicts Moral Judgment 30× Better Than Disgust-Commentary on Scott, Inbar, & Rozin (2016).
    Gray K; Schein C
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 May; 11(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 27217244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The paradox of moral focus.
    Young L; Phillips J
    Cognition; 2011 May; 119(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 21315324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The logic of universalization guides moral judgment.
    Levine S; Kleiman-Weiner M; Schulz L; Tenenbaum J; Cushman F
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Oct; 117(42):26158-26169. PubMed ID: 33008885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Are young children's preferences and evaluations of moral and conventional transgressors associated with domain distinctions in judgments?
    Smetana JG; Ball CL; Jambon M; Yoo HN
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Sep; 173():284-303. PubMed ID: 29772455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Neural substrates for moral judgments of psychological versus physical harm.
    Tsoi L; Dungan JA; Chakroff A; Young LL
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2018 May; 13(5):460-470. PubMed ID: 29718384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Order of information presentation and children's moral judgments.
    Feldman NS; Klosson EC; Parsons JE; Rholes WS; Ruble DN
    Child Dev; 1976 Jun; 47(2):556-9. PubMed ID: 1269325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The importance of moral construal: moral versus non-moral construal elicits faster, more extreme, universal evaluations of the same actions.
    Van Bavel JJ; Packer DJ; Haas IJ; Cunningham WA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e48693. PubMed ID: 23209557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Different judgment frameworks for moral compliance and moral violation.
    Shirai R; Watanabe K
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jul; 14(1):16432. PubMed ID: 39014035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. No luck for moral luck.
    Kneer M; Machery E
    Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():331-348. PubMed ID: 30428399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Increasing the role of belief information in moral judgments by stimulating the right temporoparietal junction.
    Sellaro R; Güroǧlu B; Nitsche MA; van den Wildenberg WP; Massaro V; Durieux J; Hommel B; Colzato LS
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():400-8. PubMed ID: 26375450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The relevance of moral norms in distinct relational contexts: Purity versus harm norms regulate self-directed actions.
    Dungan JA; Chakroff A; Young L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173405. PubMed ID: 28278214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.