These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. [Structure of proximal surfaces of amalgam restorations under the scanning electron microscope]. Koçkapan C Zahnarztl Prax; 1991 Jan; 42(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 1872052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Amalgam filling before and after polishing: a scanning electron microscopic study]. Gharevi N Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1981; 36(12):845-53. PubMed ID: 6947889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Microscopic observations of amalgams carved by different methods and subsequently polished. Dahi F; Dorfman RL; Asgar K; Corpron RE J Am Dent Assoc; 1978 Aug; 97(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 277590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A study of marginal leakage of burnished and unburnished amalgam restorations in vitro subjected to thermal stress. Marfaria AT; Dessi VM J Indian Dent Assoc; 1973 Sep; 45(9):253-7. PubMed ID: 4535078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Histological study of the adaptation of dental amalgam restorations using SEM]. Mosca OA; Poladian AJ Rev Circ Argent Odontol; 1983; 45(161):28-34. PubMed ID: 6591314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A scanning electron microscope study of one year in vivo amalgam-enamel interfaces. Full CA; Svare CW; Kerber PE Pediatr Dent; 1979 Dec; 1(4):235-8. PubMed ID: 298764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of marginal leakage of Class 2 combined amalgam-composite restorations. Eidelman E; Holan G; Tanzer-Sarneh S; Chosack A Oper Dent; 1990; 15(4):141-8. PubMed ID: 2216907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Finishing the interdental space in amalgam restorations: S.E.M. observations]. Fuzzi M; Angelini E Riv Odontoiatr Amici Brugg; 1985; 4(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 3867834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A study design for an in vivo investigation of marginal fracture in amalgam restorations. Marker VA; McKinney TW; Filler WH; Miller BH; Mitchell RJ; Okabe T Dent Mater; 1987 Dec; 3(6):322-30. PubMed ID: 3481598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical evaluation of a compomer and an amalgam primary teeth class II restorations: a 2-year comparative study. Kavvadia K; Kakaboura A; Vanderas AP; Papagiannoulis L Pediatr Dent; 2004; 26(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 15185806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Composite and amalgam fillings in a 4-year clinical comparison]. Hoyer I; Gängler P; Niemela S Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1988; 76(7):721-6. PubMed ID: 2975115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Techniques for finishing and polishing amalgam restorations. Woerth JK Dent Hyg (Chic); 1981 Sep; 55(9):31-5. PubMed ID: 6948705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of surface treatment on marginal integrity of amalgam restorations (in vitro study). Kamel FM Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jul; 41(3):1313-20. PubMed ID: 9497675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Periodontal implications of Class II restorations. Clinical and SEM evaluation. Raju PV; Varma BR; Bhat KM Indian J Dent Res; 1996; 7(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 9495121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of techniques for the evaluation of marginal adaptation of amalgam restorations. Mjör IA; Ryge G Int Dent J; 1981 Mar; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 7009431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]