These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

661 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29868938)

  • 1. Predicted versus observed 30-day perioperative outcomes using the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.
    Blair BM; Lehman EB; Jafri SM; Kaag MG; Raman JD
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Jul; 50(7):1249-1256. PubMed ID: 29868938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contemporary Perioperative Morbidity and Mortality Rates of Minimally Invasive
    Khalil MI; Ubeda J; Soehner T; Bhandari NR; Payakachat N; Davis R; Raheem OA; Kamel MH
    J Endourol; 2019 Nov; 33(11):920-927. PubMed ID: 31333072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting Complications Following Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy with the ACS NSQIP
    Winoker JS; Paulucci DJ; Anastos H; Waingankar N; Abaza R; Eun DD; Bhandari A; Hemal AK; Sfakianos JP; Badani KK
    J Urol; 2017 Oct; 198(4):803-809. PubMed ID: 28400189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. American Confederation of Urology (CAU) experience in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.
    Secin FP; Castillo OA; Rozanec JJ; Featherston M; Holst P; Milfont JC; García Marchiñena P; Jurado Navarro A; Autrán A; Rovegno AR; Faba OR; Palou J; Teixeira Dubeux V; Nuñez Bragayrac L; Sotelo R; Zequi S; Guimarães GC; Álvarez-Maestro M; Martínez-Piñeiro L; Villoldo G; Villaronga A; Abreu Clavijo D; Decia R; Frota R; Vidal-Mora I; Finkelstein D; Monzó Gardiner JI; Schatloff O; Hernández-Porrás A; Santaella-Torres F; Quesada ET; Sánchez-Salas R; Dávila H; Mavric HV
    World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 27137994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator for Laparoscopic Colectomy: how good is it and how can we improve it?
    Cologne KG; Keller DS; Liwanag L; Devaraj B; Senagore AJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Mar; 220(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 25617914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy provides better operative outcomes as compared to the laparoscopic and open approaches: results from a prospective cohort study.
    Luciani LG; Chiodini S; Mattevi D; Cai T; Puglisi M; Mantovani W; Malossini G
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Sep; 11(3):333-339. PubMed ID: 28000016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. R-LESS partial nephrectomy trifecta outcome is inferior to multiport robotic partial nephrectomy: comparative analysis.
    Komninos C; Shin TY; Tuliao P; Yoon YE; Koo KC; Chang CH; Kim SW; Ha JY; Han WK; Rha KH
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):512-7. PubMed ID: 24275311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic partial nephrectomy with superselective versus main artery clamping: a retrospective comparison.
    Desai MM; de Castro Abreu AL; Leslie S; Cai J; Huang EY; Lewandowski PM; Lee D; Dharmaraja A; Berger AK; Goh A; Ukimura O; Aron M; Gill IS
    Eur Urol; 2014 Oct; 66(4):713-9. PubMed ID: 24486306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. External validation of a model for tailoring the operative approach to minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.
    Vricella GJ; Murray S; Boncher NA; Madi R
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1806-10. PubMed ID: 21040363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive factors of overall and major postoperative complications after partial nephrectomy: Results from a multicenter prospective study (The RECORd 1 project).
    Mari A; Antonelli A; Bertolo R; Bianchi G; Borghesi M; Ficarra V; Fiori C; Furlan M; Giancane S; Longo N; Mirone V; Morgia G; Porpiglia F; Rovereto B; Schiavina R; Serni S; Simeone C; Volpe A; Carini M; Minervini A
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):823-830. PubMed ID: 27876194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oncological outcomes of minimally invasive partial versus minimally invasive radical nephrectomy for cT1-2/N0/M0 clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Simone G; Tuderti G; Anceschi U; Papalia R; Ferriero M; Misuraca L; Minisola F; Mastroianni R; Costantini M; Guaglianone S; Sentinelli S; Gallucci M
    World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):789-794. PubMed ID: 27578234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of the timing of surgical complications following nephrectomy: data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).
    Sood A; Abdollah F; Sammon JD; Kapoor V; Rogers CG; Jeong W; Klett DE; Hanske J; Meyer CP; Peabody JO; Menon M; Trinh QD
    World J Urol; 2015 Dec; 33(12):2031-8. PubMed ID: 25910477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of overall survival and perioperative outcomes between partial and radical nephrectomy for cT1b and cT2 renal cell carcinoma-Analysis of a national cancer registry.
    Venkatramani V; Koru-Sengul T; Miao F; Nahar B; Prakash NS; Swain S; Punnen S; Ritch C; Gonzalgo M; Parekh D
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 36(3):90.e9-90.e14. PubMed ID: 29254672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relationship of postoperative complications with in-hospital outcomes and costs after renal surgery for kidney cancer.
    Kim SP; Leibovich BC; Shah ND; Weight CJ; Borah BJ; Han LC; Boorjian SA; Thompson RH
    BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):580-8. PubMed ID: 22564425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients.
    Marszalek M; Meixl H; Polajnar M; Rauchenwald M; Jeschke K; Madersbacher S
    Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1171-8. PubMed ID: 19232819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Five-year Oncologic Outcomes After Transperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    Andrade HS; Zargar H; Caputo PA; Akca O; Kara O; Ramirez D; Haber GP; Stein RJ; Kaouk JH
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1149-54. PubMed ID: 26719014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tumor enucleation vs sharp excision in minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: technical benefit without impact on functional or oncologic outcomes.
    Mukkamala A; Allam CL; Ellison JS; Hafez KS; Miller DC; Montgomery JS; Weizer AZ; Wolf JS
    Urology; 2014 Jun; 83(6):1294-9. PubMed ID: 24713137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of elective robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal tumours with high surgical complexity.
    Volpe A; Garrou D; Amparore D; De Naeyer G; Porpiglia F; Ficarra V; Mottrie A
    BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6):903-9. PubMed ID: 24673750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic unclamped "minimal-margin" partial nephrectomy: ongoing refinement of the anatomic zero-ischemia concept.
    Satkunasivam R; Tsai S; Syan S; Bernhard JC; de Castro Abreu AL; Chopra S; Berger AK; Lee D; Hung AJ; Cai J; Desai MM; Gill IS
    Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):705-12. PubMed ID: 26071789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends and perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic nephrectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.
    Liu JJ; Leppert JT; Maxwell BG; Panousis P; Chung BI
    Urol Oncol; 2014 May; 32(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 24332644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.