These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29869012)
1. Accuracy of plain antero-posterior radiographic-based methods for measurement of acetabular cup version. Alzohiry MA; Abdelnasser MK; Moustafa M; Mahran M; Bakr H; Khalifa Y; Abelaal A; Atta H; Said GZ Int Orthop; 2018 Dec; 42(12):2777-2785. PubMed ID: 29869012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty on plain radiographs. Park YS; Shin WC; Lee SM; Kwak SH; Bae JY; Suh KT J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Apr; 13(1):66. PubMed ID: 29609639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of planar anteversion measurements using anteroposterior radiographs. Lee GC; Lee SH; Kang SW; Park HS; Jo S BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Dec; 20(1):586. PubMed ID: 31805912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of Acetabular Component Anteversion after Total Hip Arthroplasty: Comparison of Anteroposterior and Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs with Computed Tomography Scans. Goyal T; Paul S; Choudhury AK; Gupta T Clin Orthop Surg; 2021 Sep; 13(3):329-335. PubMed ID: 34484625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and validity of measuring version of the acetabular component. Nho JH; Lee YK; Kim HJ; Ha YC; Suh YS; Koo KH J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jan; 94(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 22219244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-equivalent Results from Different Anteversion Measurements Methods for the Evaluation of the Acetabular Cup Orientation in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Snijders TE; Schlösser TPC; van Gaalen SM; Castelein RM; Weinans H; de Gast A Orthop Surg; 2019 Apr; 11(2):241-247. PubMed ID: 30932341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measuring Acetabular Cup Orientation on Antero-Posterior Radiographs of the Hip after Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Vector Arithmetic Radiological Method. Is It Valid and Verified for Daily Clinical Practice? Craiovan B; Weber M; Worlicek M; Schneider M; Springorum HR; Zeman F; Grifka J; Renkawitz T Rofo; 2016 Jun; 188(6):574-81. PubMed ID: 27093395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoperative evaluation of acetabular cup position during anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: are we accurately interpreting? Delagrammaticas DE; Ochenjele G; Rosenthal BD; Assenmacher B; Manning DW; Stover MD Hip Int; 2020 Jan; 30(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 31387397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography. Bayraktar V; Weber M; von Kunow F; Zeman F; Craiovan B; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Woerner M Int Orthop; 2017 Apr; 41(4):731-738. PubMed ID: 27277948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Plain Radiographs are a Useful Substitute for Computed Tomography in Evaluating Acetabular Cup Version. Noback PC; Danoff JR; Herschmiller T; Bobman JT; Shah RP; Geller JA; Macaulay W J Arthroplasty; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2320-4. PubMed ID: 27181489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurements of acetabular cup position and pelvic spatial orientation after total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography/radiography matching. Blendea S; Eckman K; Jaramaz B; Levison TJ; Digioia AM Comput Aided Surg; 2005 Jan; 10(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 16199380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study. Domb BG; El Bitar YF; Sadik AY; Stake CE; Botser IB Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jan; 472(1):329-36. PubMed ID: 23990446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A new radiographic acetabular cup anteversion measurement method in total hip arthroplasty: a clinical study. Saka G; Altun G; Burc H; Aydogan M Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2019 May; 29(4):813-818. PubMed ID: 30656431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement of acetabular cup anteversion with the circle theorem. Kosiyatrakul A; Luenam S; Chotanaphuti T J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S128-33. PubMed ID: 20120674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Measurement of acetabular cup inclination in anteroposterior pelvic radiogram : An indicator of quality after primary total hip arthroplasty?]. Loitsch T; Freitag T; Leucht F; Reichel H; Bieger R Orthopade; 2018 Dec; 47(12):1003-1008. PubMed ID: 30143824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduced-dose computed tomography is the most accurate method to measure ceramic hip resurfacing cup version. Saracco A; Grassi A; Romagnoli M; Camarda L; Logishetty K; Zaffagnini S; Cobb J Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jul; 128():109040. PubMed ID: 32442835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An analysis of the best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip replacement on plain radiographs. Nomura T; Naito M; Nakamura Y; Ida T; Kuroda D; Kobayashi T; Sakamoto T; Seo H Bone Joint J; 2014 May; 96-B(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 24788492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Position of the acetabular cup -- accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement. Kalteis T; Handel M; Herold T; Perlick L; Paetzel C; Grifka J Eur J Radiol; 2006 May; 58(2):294-300. PubMed ID: 16289687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The validity and reproducibility of cross table radiographs compared with CT scans for the measurement of anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty. Pankaj A; Mittal A; Chawla A Bone Joint J; 2017 Aug; 99-B(8):1006-1011. PubMed ID: 28768776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and validity of measuring acetabular component orientation by plain anteroposterior radiographs. Lu M; Zhou YX; Du H; Zhang J; Liu J Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Sep; 471(9):2987-94. PubMed ID: 23645336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]