These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29869012)
21. Evaluation of radiological methods of assessing cup anteversion in total hip replacement. Manjunath KS; Soruban V; Gopalakrishna KG Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Dec; 25(8):1285-92. PubMed ID: 26454442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Pilot Study of Augmented Reality Technology Applied to the Acetabular Cup Placement During Total Hip Arthroplasty. Ogawa H; Hasegawa S; Tsukada S; Matsubara M J Arthroplasty; 2018 Jun; 33(6):1833-1837. PubMed ID: 29502961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Radiographic Assessment of Femoral Stem Torsion in Total Hip Arthroplasty-A Comparison of a Caput-Collum-Diaphyseal Angle-Based Technique With the Budin View. Woerner ML; Weber M; Craiovan BS; Springorum HR; Grifka J; Renkawitz TF J Arthroplasty; 2016 May; 31(5):1117-22. PubMed ID: 26781395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The posterior acetabular wall (PAW): an aid to acetabular orientation at primary THA. Williams HLM; Bartlett GE; Norton MR; Middleton RG Hip Int; 2018 Jan; 28(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 28885650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A precise method for determining acetabular component anteversion after total hip arthroplasty. Murphy MP; Killen CJ; Ralles SJ; Brown NM; Hopkinson WJ; Wu K Bone Joint J; 2019 Sep; 101-B(9):1042-1049. PubMed ID: 31474147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is the acetabular cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty on a two dimension or three dimension model accurate? Craiovan B; Renkawitz T; Weber M; Grifka J; Nolte L; Zheng G Int Orthop; 2014 Oct; 38(10):2009-15. PubMed ID: 24737148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in navigated THA with modified registration technique in semilateral decubitus position. Suksathien Y; Suksathien R; Chaiwirattana P J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Oct; 97(10):1089-95. PubMed ID: 25632626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. Merle C; Grammatopoulos G; Waldstein W; Pegg E; Pandit H; Aldinger PR; Gill HS; Murray DW J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Nov; 95(22):e172. PubMed ID: 24257672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The reliability of measuring acetabular component position on radiographs using everyday diagnostic imaging software. Lahy J; Stevens J; McKenzie D; de Steiger R J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017; 25(2):2309499017718953. PubMed ID: 28675977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Pelvis and total hip arthroplasty acetabular component orientations in sitting and standing positions: measurements reproductibility with EOS imaging system versus conventional radiographies. Lazennec JY; Rousseau MA; Rangel A; Gorin M; Belicourt C; Brusson A; Catonné Y Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Jun; 97(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 21570378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position. Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A cadaver study validating CT assessment of acetabular component orientation: the Perth CT hip protocol. Arora V; Hannan R; Beaver R; Fletcher T; Harvie P Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Feb; 46(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 27826701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. 2D measurements of cup orientation are less reliable than 3D measurements. Davda K; Smyth N; Cobb JP; Hart AJ Acta Orthop; 2015; 86(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 25674698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Central X-ray beam correction of radiographic acetabular cup measurement after THA: an experimental study. Schwarz T; Weber M; Wörner M; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Craiovan B Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 May; 12(5):829-837. PubMed ID: 27714567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does using a polyethylene RM press-fit cup modify the preparation of the acetabulum and acetabular offset in primary hip arthroplasty? Erivan R; Aubret S; Villatte G; Mulliez A; Descamps S; Boisgard S Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):669-674. PubMed ID: 28579018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. High Variability of Acetabular Offset in Primary Hip Osteoarthritis Influences Acetabular Reaming-A Computed Tomography-Based Anatomic Study. Merle C; Innmann MM; Waldstein W; Pegg EC; Aldinger PR; Gill HS; Murray DW; Grammatopoulos G J Arthroplasty; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1808-1814. PubMed ID: 31122846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of acetabular version in total hip arthroplasty: an application of Widmer's technique in a regional setting. Trieu J; Hadden AEF; Sutherland AG ANZ J Surg; 2018 Jun; 88(6):573-576. PubMed ID: 29864258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Efficacy of a computed tomography-based navigation system for placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Tsutsui T; Goto T; Wada K; Takasago T; Hamada D; Sairyo K J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017; 25(3):2309499017727954. PubMed ID: 28851263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Acetabular Placement Accuracy With the Direct Anterior Approach Freehand Technique. Soderquist MC; Scully R; Unger AS J Arthroplasty; 2017 Sep; 32(9):2748-2754. PubMed ID: 28499624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A mathematical method for precisely calculating the radiographic angles of the cup after total hip arthroplasty. Zhao JX; Su XY; Xiao RX; Zhao Z; Zhang LH; Zhang LC; Tang PF Med Eng Phys; 2016 Nov; 38(11):1376-1381. PubMed ID: 27720337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]