These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29869012)
41. Radiographic Underestimation of In Vivo Cup Coverage Provided by Total Hip Arthroplasty for Dysplasia. Nie Y; Wang H; Huang Z; Shen B; Kraus VB; Zhou Z Orthopedics; 2018 Jan; 41(1):e46-e51. PubMed ID: 29156073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Preliminary application of computer-assisted patient-specific acetabular navigational template for total hip arthroplasty in adult single development dysplasia of the hip. Zhang YZ; Chen B; Lu S; Yang Y; Zhao JM; Liu R; Li YB; Pei GX Int J Med Robot; 2011 Dec; 7(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 22113980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Correct Assessment of Acetabular Component Orientation in Total Hip Arthroplasty From Plane Radiographs. Widmer D; Reising K; Kotter E; Helwig P J Arthroplasty; 2018 Aug; 33(8):2652-2659.e3. PubMed ID: 29615377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Validating a Modified Circle Theorem Method for the Measurement of Acetabular Cup Anteversion on Plain Radiography with Intra-Operative Data from Robotic Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty. Amirouche F; Solitro GF; Chandrasekaran S; Domb BG; Gonzalez MH J Arthroplasty; 2016 Jan; 31(1):323-9. PubMed ID: 26318083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Accuracy and practicability of a patient-specific guide using acetabular superolateral rim during THA in Crowe II/III DDH patients: a retrospective study. Wang C; Xiao H; Yang W; Wang L; Hu Y; Liu H; Zhong D J Orthop Surg Res; 2019 Jan; 14(1):19. PubMed ID: 30642333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Planning-Assisted and Conventional Acetabular Cup Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Sariali E; Boukhelifa N; Catonne Y; Pascal Moussellard H J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 98(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 26791031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A retrospective study on the relationship between altered native acetabular angle and vertical implant malpositioning. Rojas J; Bautista M; Bonilla G; Amado O; Huerfano E; Monsalvo D; Llinás A; Navas J Int Orthop; 2018 Apr; 42(4):769-775. PubMed ID: 28782077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A new technique for radiographic measurement of acetabular cup orientation. Derbyshire B; Diggle PJ; Ingham CJ; Macnair R; Wimhurst J; Jones HW J Arthroplasty; 2014 Feb; 29(2):369-72. PubMed ID: 23896357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Computed tomography versus plain radiography assessment of acetabular fracture reduction is more predictive for native hip survivorship. Verbeek DO; van der List JP; Helfet DL Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2019 Dec; 139(12):1667-1672. PubMed ID: 31030241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Minimal radiation dose computed tomography for measurement of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty. Arai N; Nakamura S; Matsushita T; Suzuki S J Arthroplasty; 2010 Feb; 25(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 19442484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Usefulness of intraoperative C-arm image intensifier in reducing errors of acetabular component during primary total hip arthroplasty: an application of Widmer's method. Song JH; Kim YS; Kwon SY; Lim YW; Jung J; Oh S BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Oct; 22(1):892. PubMed ID: 34670523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Reliability and Validity of Standing Lateral Radiograph Method for Measuring Acetabular Component Version: A Modified Cross-table Lateral Radiograph Method. Zhang W; Xu J; Li D; Sun H; Cai Z; Chen M; Ma R Orthop Surg; 2022 Aug; 14(8):1622-1629. PubMed ID: 35711111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Accuracy of the acetabular index using the percutaneous assisted total hip technique. Daluga DJ Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2012 Feb; 41(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 22482091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Accuracy and precision of version angle measurements of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty. Nishino H; Nakamura S; Arai N; Matsushita T J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1644-7. PubMed ID: 23566697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. How Reliable is the Acetabular Cup Position Assessment from Routine Radiographs? Carvajal Alba JA; Vincent HK; Sodhi JS; Latta LL; Parvataneni HK Iowa Orthop J; 2017; 37():181-187. PubMed ID: 28852355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A validation model for measurement of acetabular component position. Malik A; Wan Z; Jaramaz B; Bowman G; Dorr LD J Arthroplasty; 2010 Aug; 25(5):812-9. PubMed ID: 19553075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Three-dimensional in vivo difference between native acetabular version and acetabular component version influences iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty. Park KK; Tsai TY; Dimitriou D; Kwon YM Int Orthop; 2016 Sep; 40(9):1807-12. PubMed ID: 26611727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Long-term results of the CLS acetabular cup in primary total hip replacement]. Rozkydal Z; Janícek P; Tomás T; Florian Z Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 19439127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The reliability and accuracy of measuring anteversion of the acetabular component on plain anteroposterior and lateral radiographs after total hip arthroplasty. Shin WC; Lee SM; Lee KW; Cho HJ; Lee JS; Suh KT Bone Joint J; 2015 May; 97-B(5):611-6. PubMed ID: 25922453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Inter- and intra-observer variability of radiography and computed tomography for evaluation of Zurich cementless acetabular cup placement ex vivo. Leasure JO; Peck JN; Villamil A; Fiore KL; Tano CA Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2016 Nov; 29(6):507-514. PubMed ID: 27779271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]