426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29869406)
1. Age-adjusted cut-off using the IL D-dimer HS assay to exclude pulmonary embolism in patients presenting to emergency.
Lim MS; Bennett A; Chunilal S
Intern Med J; 2018 Sep; 48(9):1096-1101. PubMed ID: 29869406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to rule out pulmonary embolism: the ADJUST-PE study.
Righini M; Van Es J; Den Exter PL; Roy PM; Verschuren F; Ghuysen A; Rutschmann OT; Sanchez O; Jaffrelot M; Trinh-Duc A; Le Gall C; Moustafa F; Principe A; Van Houten AA; Ten Wolde M; Douma RA; Hazelaar G; Erkens PM; Van Kralingen KW; Grootenboers MJ; Durian MF; Cheung YW; Meyer G; Bounameaux H; Huisman MV; Kamphuisen PW; Le Gal G
JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(11):1117-24. PubMed ID: 24643601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The combination of four different clinical decision rules and an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off increases the number of patients in whom acute pulmonary embolism can safely be excluded.
van Es J; Mos I; Douma R; Erkens P; Durian M; Nizet T; van Houten A; Hofstee H; ten Cate H; Ullmann E; Büller H; Huisman M; Kamphuisen PW
Thromb Haemost; 2012 Jan; 107(1):167-71. PubMed ID: 22072293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical usefulness and safety of an age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff levels to exclude pulmonary embolism: a retrospective analysis.
Flores J; García de Tena J; Galipienzo J; García-Avello Á; Pérez-Rodríguez E; Tortuero JI; Álvarez C; Ruíz A; Arribas I
Intern Emerg Med; 2016 Feb; 11(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 26345535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Heightened clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism and disregard of the D-dimer assay: a contemporary trend in an era of increased access to computed tomography pulmonary angiogram?
Sud R; Langfield J; Chu G
Intern Med J; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1231-6. PubMed ID: 23800111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ruling out low- and moderate-risk probability pulmonary emboli without radiological imaging: appraisal of a clinical prediction algorithm after implementation and revision with higher D-dimer thresholds.
Woo YP; Thien F
Intern Med J; 2016 Jul; 46(7):787-92. PubMed ID: 27059008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Age-adjusted versus clinical probability-adjusted D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism.
Takach Lapner S; Stevens SM; Woller SC; Snow G; Kearon C
Thromb Res; 2018 Jul; 167():15-19. PubMed ID: 29753834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age-adjusted D-dimer thresholds in the investigation of suspected pulmonary embolism: A retrospective evaluation in patients ages 50 and older using administrative data.
Senior K; Burles K; Wang D; Grigat D; Innes GD; Andruchow JE; Lang ES; McRae AD
CJEM; 2018 Sep; 20(5):725-731. PubMed ID: 29866211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ELISA D-dimer measurement for the clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: one-year observational study of the safety profile and physician's prescription.
Fr V; Hainaut P; Fr T; Elamly A; Dessomme B; Lavenne E; Reynaert MS
Acta Clin Belg; 2003; 58(4):233-40. PubMed ID: 14635531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Wells and YEARS clinical decision rules with D-dimer for low-risk pulmonary embolus patients.
McLenachan CJ; Chua O; Chan BSH; Vecellio E; Chiew AL
Intern Med J; 2019 Jun; 49(6):739-744. PubMed ID: 30324677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Age-adjusted D-dimer cut-offs to diagnose thromboembolic events: validation in an emergency department].
Verma N; Willeke P; Bicsán P; Lebiedz P; Pavenstädt H; Kümpers P
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed; 2014 Mar; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23846173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the age-adjusted and clinical probability-adjusted D-dimer to exclude pulmonary embolism in the ED.
Sharif S; Eventov M; Kearon C; Parpia S; Li M; Jiang R; Sneath P; Fuentes CO; Marriott C; de Wit K
Am J Emerg Med; 2019 May; 37(5):845-850. PubMed ID: 30077494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can an age-adjusted D-dimer level be adopted in managing venous thromboembolism in the emergency department? A retrospective cohort study.
Jaconelli T; Eragat M; Crane S
Eur J Emerg Med; 2018 Aug; 25(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 28079562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Potential of an age adjusted D-dimer cut-off value to improve the exclusion of pulmonary embolism in older patients: a retrospective analysis of three large cohorts.
Douma RA; le Gal G; Söhne M; Righini M; Kamphuisen PW; Perrier A; Kruip MJ; Bounameaux H; Büller HR; Roy PM
BMJ; 2010 Mar; 340():c1475. PubMed ID: 20354012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the elderly: adherence to guidelines and age-adjusted D-dimer concentration values.
Lozano-Polo L; Puig-Campmany M; Herrera-Mateo S; Mateo-Roca M; Santos-Rodríguez JA; Benito-Vales S
Emergencias; 2018 Oct; 30(5):321-327. PubMed ID: 30260116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical usefulness of adjusted D-dimer cut-off values to exclude pulmonary embolism in a community hospital emergency department patient population.
Vossen JA; Albrektson J; Sensarma A; Williams SC
Acta Radiol; 2012 Sep; 53(7):765-8. PubMed ID: 22761348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Age-adjusted D-dimers and pulmonary embolism].
Ongaro G; Righini M; Perrier A; Marti C
Rev Med Suisse; 2014 Oct; 10(446):1908, 1910-2. PubMed ID: 25438373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of a diagnostic algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism in an emergency department.
Galipienzo J; Garcia de Tena J; Flores J; Alvarez C; Garcia-Avello A; Arribas I
Rom J Intern Med; 2012; 50(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 23330286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can the use of an age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off value help in our diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism? .
Dutton J; Dachsel M; Crane R
Clin Med (Lond); 2018 Aug; 18(4):293-296. PubMed ID: 30072551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism with d-Dimer Adjusted to Clinical Probability.
Kearon C; de Wit K; Parpia S; Schulman S; Afilalo M; Hirsch A; Spencer FA; Sharma S; D'Aragon F; Deshaies JF; Le Gal G; Lazo-Langner A; Wu C; Rudd-Scott L; Bates SM; Julian JA;
N Engl J Med; 2019 Nov; 381(22):2125-2134. PubMed ID: 31774957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
