BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29869921)

  • 1. Utility of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurements and normalized apparent diffusion coefficient ratios in the diagnosis of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate cancer.
    Nguyen TB; Ushinsky A; Yang A; Nguyentat M; Fardin S; Uchio E; Lall C; Lee T; Houshyar R
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 91(1088):20180091. PubMed ID: 29869921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective Inclusion of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients in Multiparametric Prostate MRI Structured Reports: Discrimination of Clinically Insignificant and Significant Cancers.
    Costa DN; Xi Y; Aziz M; Passoni N; Shakir N; Goldberg K; Francis F; Roehrborn CG; Leon AD; Pedrosa I
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Jan; 212(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 30383404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Assist PI-RADS Version 2 DWI Scoring? A Correlation Study Using the PI-RADSv2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Systems.
    Gaur S; Harmon S; Rosenblum L; Greer MD; Mehralivand S; Coskun M; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Shih JH; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jul; 211(1):W33-W41. PubMed ID: 29733695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
    Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative evaluation of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient values on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict higher Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Kato S; Kamijima S; Inaoka T; Kamiya N; Sasai D; Terada H; Hiruta N; Suzuki H
    Scand J Urol; 2018 Jun; 52(3):180-185. PubMed ID: 29939084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: Repeatability of Volume and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Quantification.
    Fedorov A; Vangel MG; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Sep; 52(9):538-546. PubMed ID: 28463931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Derived From Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Has the Potential to Avoid Unnecessary MRI-Guided Biopsies of mpMRI-Detected PI-RADS 4 and 5 Lesions.
    Polanec SH; Helbich TH; Bickel H; Wengert GJ; Pinker K; Spick C; Clauser P; Susani M; Shariat S; Baltzer PAT
    Invest Radiol; 2018 Dec; 53(12):736-741. PubMed ID: 29985792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does normalisation improve the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient values for prostate cancer assessment? A blinded independent-observer evaluation.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Khalef V; Xu W; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Doshi AM
    Clin Radiol; 2015 Sep; 70(9):1032-7. PubMed ID: 26126712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient parameters with prostate imaging reporting and data system V2 assessment for detection of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate cancer.
    Hassanzadeh E; Alessandrino F; Olubiyi OI; Glazer DI; Mulkern RV; Fedorov A; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 May; 43(5):1237-1244. PubMed ID: 28840280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiparametric MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Accuracy in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Pepe P; D'Urso D; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M; Russo G; Sabini MG; Valastro LM; Galia A; Fraggetta F
    In Vivo; 2017; 31(3):415-418. PubMed ID: 28438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Targeted Biopsy Validation of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer Characterization With Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting and Diffusion Mapping.
    Panda A; OʼConnor G; Lo WC; Jiang Y; Margevicius S; Schluchter M; Ponsky LE; Gulani V
    Invest Radiol; 2019 Aug; 54(8):485-493. PubMed ID: 30985480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system 
with the apparent diffusion coefficient map for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer].
    Feng Z; Yan Z; Luo M; Liao Y; Rong P; Wang W
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Mar; 44(3):277-284. PubMed ID: 30971520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Ratio Versus Conventional ADC for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With 3-T MRI.
    Bajgiran AM; Mirak SA; Sung K; Sisk AE; Reiter RE; Raman SS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Sep; 213(3):W134-W142. PubMed ID: 31216201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Kopec M; Kong X; Melamed J; Dakwar G; Babb JS; Taouli B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1387-94. PubMed ID: 20512891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative Analysis of Prostate Multiparametric MR Images for Detection of Aggressive Prostate Cancer in the Peripheral Zone: A Multiple Imager Study.
    Hoang Dinh A; Melodelima C; Souchon R; Lehaire J; Bratan F; Mège-Lechevallier F; Ruffion A; Crouzet S; Colombel M; Rouvière O
    Radiology; 2016 Jul; 280(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 26859255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of the addition of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient data on the diagnostic performance of the PI-RADS v2 scoring system to detect clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Moraes MO; Roman DHH; Copetti J; de S Santos F; Agra A; Noronha JAP; Carvalhal G; Neto EJD; Zanon M; Baldisserotto M; Hochhegger B
    World J Urol; 2020 Apr; 38(4):981-991. PubMed ID: 31175458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Which clinical and radiological characteristics can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions? A retrospective study in a high-volume academic center.
    Hermie I; Van Besien J; De Visschere P; Lumen N; Decaestecker K
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():92-98. PubMed ID: 31005183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of PI-RADS 2, ADC histogram-derived parameters, and their combination for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer.
    Lin WC; Westphalen AC; Silva GE; Chodraui Filho S; Reis RB; Muglia VF
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Nov; 41(11):2209-2217. PubMed ID: 27364781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The performance of PI-RADSv2 and quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting confirmatory prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of prostate cancer.
    Nougaret S; Robertson N; Golia Pernicka J; Molinari N; Hötker AM; Ehdaie B; Sala E; Hricak H; Vargas HA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1968-1974. PubMed ID: 28258355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic value of semi-quantitative and quantitative analysis of functional parameters in multiparametric MRI of the prostate.
    Hauth E; Halbritter D; Jaeger H; Hohmuth H; Beer M
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Oct; 90(1078):20170067. PubMed ID: 28749167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.