These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29870521)

  • 1. Perceptual Doping: An Audiovisual Facilitation Effect on Auditory Speech Processing, From Phonetic Feature Extraction to Sentence Identification in Noise.
    Moradi S; Lidestam B; Ning Ng EH; Danielsson H; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):312-327. PubMed ID: 29870521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Text as a Supplement to Speech in Young and Older Adults.
    Krull V; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 26458131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration.
    Grant KW; Walden BE; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2677-90. PubMed ID: 9604361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiovisual Enhancement of Speech Perception in Noise by School-Age Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
    Lalonde K; McCreery RW
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):705-719. PubMed ID: 32032226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual Doping: A Hypothesis on How Early Audiovisual Speech Stimulation Enhances Subsequent Auditory Speech Processing.
    Moradi S; Rönnberg J
    Brain Sci; 2023 Apr; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 37190566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. During Lipreading Training With Sentence Stimuli, Feedback Controls Learning and Generalization to Audiovisual Speech in Noise.
    Bernstein LE; Auer ET; Eberhardt SP
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Mar; 31(1):57-77. PubMed ID: 34965362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual Cues Contribute Differentially to Audiovisual Perception of Consonants and Vowels in Improving Recognition and Reducing Cognitive Demands in Listeners With Hearing Impairment Using Hearing Aids.
    Moradi S; Lidestam B; Danielsson H; Ng EHN; Rönnberg J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 60(9):2687-2703. PubMed ID: 28651255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audiovisual spoken word training can promote or impede auditory-only perceptual learning: prelingually deafened adults with late-acquired cochlear implants versus normal hearing adults.
    Bernstein LE; Eberhardt SP; Auer ET
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():934. PubMed ID: 25206344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual speech alters the discrimination and identification of non-intact auditory speech in children with hearing loss.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; McAlpine RP; Abdi H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 94():127-137. PubMed ID: 28167003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reconstructing wholes from parts: effects of modality, age, and hearing loss on word recognition.
    Krull V; Humes LE; Kidd GR
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(2):e14-23. PubMed ID: 23165223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aided and unaided speech perception by older hearing impaired listeners.
    Woods DL; Arbogast T; Doss Z; Younus M; Herron TJ; Yund EW
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0114922. PubMed ID: 25730423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can Closed-Set Word Recognition Differentially Assess Vowel and Consonant Perception for School-Age Children With and Without Hearing Loss?
    Buss E; Felder J; Miller MK; Leibold LJ; Calandruccio L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Oct; 65(10):3934-3950. PubMed ID: 36194777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Processing Mechanisms in Hearing-Impaired Listeners: Evidence from Reaction Times and Sentence Interpretation.
    Carroll R; Uslar V; Brand T; Ruigendijk E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e391-e401. PubMed ID: 27748664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phonological Priming in Children with Hearing Loss: Effect of Speech Mode, Fidelity, and Lexical Status.
    Jerger S; Tye-Murray N; Damian MF; Abdi H
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):623-633. PubMed ID: 27438867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing Simulated Channel Interaction Reveals Differences in Phoneme Identification Between Children and Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Jahn KN; DiNino M; Arenberg JG
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):295-311. PubMed ID: 29927780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.