131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29870930)
1. Decoding natural images from evoked brain activities using encoding models with invertible mapping.
Li C; Xu J; Liu B
Neural Netw; 2018 Sep; 105():227-235. PubMed ID: 29870930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modular encoding and decoding models derived from bayesian canonical correlation analysis.
Fujiwara Y; Miyawaki Y; Kamitani Y
Neural Comput; 2013 Apr; 25(4):979-1005. PubMed ID: 23339608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-subject brain decoding with multi-task feature selection.
Wang L; Tang X; Liu W; Peng Y; Gao T; Xu Y
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2987-94. PubMed ID: 25227006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spatially regularized machine learning for task and resting-state fMRI.
Song X; Panych LP; Chen NK
J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jan; 257():214-28. PubMed ID: 26470627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Decoding the individual finger movements from single-trial functional magnetic resonance imaging recordings of human brain activity.
Shen G; Zhang J; Wang M; Lei D; Yang G; Zhang S; Du X
Eur J Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 39(12):2071-82. PubMed ID: 24661456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of spatial resolution on decoding accuracy in fMRI multivariate pattern analysis.
Gardumi A; Ivanov D; Hausfeld L; Valente G; Formisano E; Uludağ K
Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():32-42. PubMed ID: 26899782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multivariate Bayesian decoding of single-trial event-related fMRI responses for memory retrieval of voluntary actions.
Lee D; Yun S; Jang C; Park HJ
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182657. PubMed ID: 28777830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decoding naturalistic experiences from human brain activity via distributed representations of words.
Nishida S; Nishimoto S
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt A):232-242. PubMed ID: 28801255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of spatial smoothing on fMRI decoding of columnar-level organization with linear support vector machine.
Misaki M; Luh WM; Bandettini PA
J Neurosci Methods; 2013 Jan; 212(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 23174092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transfer learning of deep neural network representations for fMRI decoding.
Svanera M; Savardi M; Benini S; Signoroni A; Raz G; Hendler T; Muckli L; Goebel R; Valente G
J Neurosci Methods; 2019 Dec; 328():108319. PubMed ID: 31585315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Data-driven HRF estimation for encoding and decoding models.
Pedregosa F; Eickenberg M; Ciuciu P; Thirion B; Gramfort A
Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 104():209-20. PubMed ID: 25304775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Joint sparse representation of brain activity patterns in multi-task fMRI data.
Ramezani M; Marble K; Trang H; Johnsrude IS; Abolmaesumi P
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2015 Jan; 34(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 25073167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Decoding and mapping task states of the human brain via deep learning.
Wang X; Liang X; Jiang Z; Nguchu BA; Zhou Y; Wang Y; Wang H; Li Y; Zhu Y; Wu F; Gao JH; Qiu B
Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Apr; 41(6):1505-1519. PubMed ID: 31816152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-step paretial least square regression classifiers in brain-state decoding using functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Long Z; Wang Y; Liu X; Yao L
PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0214937. PubMed ID: 30970029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Survey of encoding and decoding of visual stimulus via FMRI: an image analysis perspective.
Chen M; Han J; Hu X; Jiang X; Guo L; Liu T
Brain Imaging Behav; 2014 Mar; 8(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 23793982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variational autoencoder: An unsupervised model for encoding and decoding fMRI activity in visual cortex.
Han K; Wen H; Shi J; Lu KH; Zhang Y; Fu D; Liu Z
Neuroimage; 2019 Sep; 198():125-136. PubMed ID: 31103784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Encoding and decoding in fMRI.
Naselaris T; Kay KN; Nishimoto S; Gallant JL
Neuroimage; 2011 May; 56(2):400-10. PubMed ID: 20691790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensible decoding.
Carlson TA; Wardle SG
Neuroimage; 2015 Apr; 110():217-8. PubMed ID: 25680521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Decoding fMRI activity in the time domain improves classification performance.
Loula J; Varoquaux G; Thirion B
Neuroimage; 2018 Oct; 180(Pt A):203-210. PubMed ID: 28801250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sparse regularization techniques provide novel insights into outcome integration processes.
Mohr H; Wolfensteller U; Frimmel S; Ruge H
Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 104():163-76. PubMed ID: 25467302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
