188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29872372)
1. A Critique of Recent Epidemiologic Studies of Cancer Mortality Among Nuclear Workers.
Scott BR
Dose Response; 2018; 16(2):1559325818778702. PubMed ID: 29872372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation hormesis: historical perspective and implications for low-dose cancer risk assessment.
Vaiserman AM
Dose Response; 2010 Jan; 8(2):172-91. PubMed ID: 20585444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?
Doss M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1786-1793. PubMed ID: 30262515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The challenges of defining hormesis in epidemiological studies: The case of radiation hormesis.
Iavicoli I; Fontana L; Santocono C; Guarino D; Laudiero M; Calabrese EJ
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 902():166030. PubMed ID: 37544458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 1: Radiation and leukemia: Where LNT began.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Res; 2021 Jun; 197():111025. PubMed ID: 33744270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The healthy worker effect and nuclear industry workers.
Fornalski KW; Dobrzyński L
Dose Response; 2010 Jan; 8(2):125-47. PubMed ID: 20585442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The LNT model for cancer induction is not supported by radiobiological data.
Scott BR; Tharmalingam S
Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():34-53. PubMed ID: 30763552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Model Uncertainty via the Integration of Hormesis and LNT as the Default in Cancer Risk Assessment.
Calabrese EJ
Dose Response; 2015; 13(4):1559325815621764. PubMed ID: 26740815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals.
Sutou S
Genes Environ; 2018; 40():26. PubMed ID: 30598710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.
Scott BR
Dose Response; 2008; 6(4):333-51. PubMed ID: 19088900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The scientific basis for the use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model at low doses and dose rates in radiological protection.
Laurier D; Billarand Y; Klokov D; Leuraud K
J Radiol Prot; 2023 Jun; 43(2):. PubMed ID: 37339605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Low-Dose Radiation Risks of Lymphohematopoietic Cancer Mortality in U.S. Shipyard Workers.
Tao XG; Curriero FC; Mahesh M
Radiat Res; 2024 Jun; 201(6):586-603. PubMed ID: 36520982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Black rain in Hiroshima: a critique to the Life Span Study of A-bomb survivors, basis of the linear no-threshold model.
Sutou S
Genes Environ; 2020; 42():1. PubMed ID: 31908690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comprehensive dose reconstruction methodology for former rocketdyne/atomics international radiation workers.
Boice JD; Leggett RW; Ellis ED; Wallace PW; Mumma M; Cohen SS; Brill AB; Chadda B; Boecker BB; Yoder RC; Eckerman KF
Health Phys; 2006 May; 90(5):409-30. PubMed ID: 16607174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model.
Scott BR
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 18480143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Molecular biology, epidemiology, and the demise of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis.
Pollycove M; Feinendegen LE
C R Acad Sci III; 1999; 322(2-3):197-204. PubMed ID: 10196673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implications of recent epidemiologic studies for the linear nonthreshold model and radiation protection.
Shore RE; Beck HL; Boice JD; Caffrey EA; Davis S; Grogan HA; Mettler FA; Preston RJ; Till JE; Wakeford R; Walsh L; Dauer LT
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Sep; 38(3):1217-1233. PubMed ID: 30004025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What are the risks from medical X-rays and other low dose radiation?
Wall BF; Kendall GM; Edwards AA; Bouffler S; Muirhead CR; Meara JR
Br J Radiol; 2006 Apr; 79(940):285-94. PubMed ID: 16585719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Until There Is a Resolution of the Pro-LNT/Anti-LNT Debate, We Should Head Toward a More Sensible Graded Approach for Protection From Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation.
Sykes PJ
Dose Response; 2020; 18(2):1559325820921651. PubMed ID: 32425725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Linear No-Threshold Model VS. Radiation Hormesis.
Doss M
Dose Response; 2013; 11(4):480-97. PubMed ID: 24298226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
