252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29874632)
1. Microbial anodic consortia fed with fermentable substrates in microbial electrolysis cells: Significance of microbial structures.
Flayac C; Trably E; Bernet N
Bioelectrochemistry; 2018 Oct; 123():219-226. PubMed ID: 29874632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The electric picnic: synergistic requirements for exoelectrogenic microbial communities.
Kiely PD; Regan JM; Logan BE
Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2011 Jun; 22(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 21441020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple paths of electron flow to current in microbial electrolysis cells fed with low and high concentrations of propionate.
Hari AR; Katuri KP; Gorron E; Logan BE; Saikaly PE
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2016 Jul; 100(13):5999-6011. PubMed ID: 26936773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Response of microbial fuel cell anodic microbial communities to substrate switch of lactate-propionate-lactate].
Gao C; Wu W; Zhao Y; Wang A; Ren N; Wang M; Zhao Y
Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2015 Nov; 55(11):1495-504. PubMed ID: 26915231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Set anode potentials affect the electron fluxes and microbial community structure in propionate-fed microbial electrolysis cells.
Hari AR; Katuri KP; Logan BE; Saikaly PE
Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():38690. PubMed ID: 27934925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Resilience, Dynamics, and Interactions within a Model Multispecies Exoelectrogenic-Biofilm Community.
Prokhorova A; Sturm-Richter K; Doetsch A; Gescher J
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 83(6):. PubMed ID: 28087529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extracellular Polymeric Substances from Geobacter sulfurreducens Biofilms in Microbial Fuel Cells.
Stöckl M; Teubner NC; Holtmann D; Mangold KM; Sand W
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2019 Mar; 11(9):8961-8968. PubMed ID: 30730701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of anode potentials on selection of Geobacter strains in microbial electrolysis cells.
Commault AS; Lear G; Packer MA; Weld RJ
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Jul; 139():226-34. PubMed ID: 23665518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Potential enhancement of direct interspecies electron transfer for syntrophic metabolism of propionate and butyrate with biochar in up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors.
Zhao Z; Zhang Y; Holmes DE; Dang Y; Woodard TL; Nevin KP; Lovley DR
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Jun; 209():148-56. PubMed ID: 26967338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enrichment of anodic biofilm inoculated with anaerobic or aerobic sludge in single chambered air-cathode microbial fuel cells.
Gao C; Wang A; Wu WM; Yin Y; Zhao YG
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Sep; 167():124-32. PubMed ID: 24973773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of exoelectrogenic utilization preferences and hydrogen conversion among major fermentation products in microbial electrolysis cells.
Choi Y; Kim D; Choi H; Cha J; Baek G; Lee C
Bioresour Technol; 2024 Feb; 393():130032. PubMed ID: 38013038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Probing the robustness of Geobacter sulfurreducens against fermentation hydrolysate for uses in bioelectrochemical systems.
Härrer D; Elreedy A; Ali R; Hille-Reichel A; Gescher J
Bioresour Technol; 2023 Feb; 369():128363. PubMed ID: 36423764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased performance of hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells under alkaline conditions.
Rago L; Baeza JA; Guisasola A
Bioelectrochemistry; 2016 Jun; 109():57-62. PubMed ID: 26855359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Carbon Felt Electrode Pretreatment on Anodic Biofilm Composition in Microbial Electrolysis Cells.
Spiess S; Kucera J; Seelajaroen H; Sasiain A; Thallner S; Kremser K; Novak D; Guebitz GM; Haberbauer M
Biosensors (Basel); 2021 May; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34073192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhanced electrode-reducing rate during the enrichment process in an air-cathode microbial fuel cell.
Ishii S; Logan BE; Sekiguchi Y
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 May; 94(4):1087-94. PubMed ID: 22223104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of different substrates on the performance, bacterial diversity, and bacterial viability in microbial fuel cells.
Chae KJ; Choi MJ; Lee JW; Kim KY; Kim IS
Bioresour Technol; 2009 Jul; 100(14):3518-25. PubMed ID: 19345574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of inoculum and anode surface properties on the selection of Geobacter-dominated biofilms.
Commault AS; Barrière F; Lapinsonnière L; Lear G; Bouvier S; Weld RJ
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Nov; 195():265-72. PubMed ID: 26166461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variations of electron flux and microbial community in air-cathode microbial fuel cells fed with different substrates.
Yu J; Park Y; Cho H; Chun J; Seon J; Cho S; Lee T
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(4):748-53. PubMed ID: 22766862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Growth and current production of mixed culture anodic biofilms remain unaffected by sub-microscale surface roughness.
Pierra M; Golozar M; Zhang X; Prévoteau A; De Volder M; Reynaerts D; Rabaey K
Bioelectrochemistry; 2018 Aug; 122():213-220. PubMed ID: 29694942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Removal of Ni (II) and microbial dynamics in single-chamber microbial electrolysis cell].
Zhao X; Wu Y; Wang L; Li W; Jin M; Li S
Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2016 Nov; 56(11):1794-1801. PubMed ID: 29741843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
