161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29874964)
1. TIGR
Hallberg H; Lewin R; Elander A; Hansson E
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2018 Aug; 52(4):253-258. PubMed ID: 29874964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Use of TIGR Matrix in Breast Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery: Is a Resorbable Synthetic Mesh a Viable Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices?
Pompei S; Evangelidou D; Arelli F; Ferrante G
Clin Plast Surg; 2018 Jan; 45(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 29080661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. First-year complications after immediate breast reconstruction with a biological and a synthetic mesh in the same patient: A randomized controlled study.
Hansson E; Edvinsson AC; Elander A; Kölby L; Hallberg H
J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jan; 123(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 33051871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with complete ADM or synthetic mesh coverage - 36-Months follow-up in 200 reconstructed breasts.
Reitsamer R; Peintinger F; Klaassen-Federspiel F; Sir A
Breast; 2019 Dec; 48():32-37. PubMed ID: 31491673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One-stage immediate breast reconstruction with implants: a new option for immediate reconstruction.
Cassileth L; Kohanzadeh S; Amersi F
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 69(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 21734545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skin-Reducing Mastectomy and Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction With Submuscular-Dermal-Mesh Pocket.
Bonomi S; Sala L; Gennaro M; Ricci C; Cortinovis U
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jan; 82(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 30247191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. TIGR matrix for implant-based breast reconstruction - a long-term resorbable mesh.
Cuffolo G; Holford NC; Contractor K; Tenovici A
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2018 Sep; 15(9):689-691. PubMed ID: 30139282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Use of Synthetic Mesh in Reconstructive, Revision, and Cosmetic Breast Surgery.
Becker H; Lind Ii JG
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2020 Aug; 44(4):1120-1127. PubMed ID: 32844265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors Associated With Complications in Immediate Breast Reconstruction in 1 Stage With Completely Submuscular Implants.
Yazar S; Altinkaya A; Bengur FB; Karadag EC; Kara H; Uras C
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Sep; 83(3):264-270. PubMed ID: 30694848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of synthetic mesh in reconstructive, revision, and cosmetic breast surgery.
Becker H; Lind JG
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Oct; 37(5):914-21. PubMed ID: 23860816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix Increase Postoperative Complications of the First-Stage Reconstruction of Immediate Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Matched Cohort Study.
Woo KJ; Park JW; Mun GH; Pyon JK; Jeon BJ; Bang SI
Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Oct; 79(4):341-345. PubMed ID: 28509694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of complications after direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
Negenborn VL; Dikmans REG; Bouman MB; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Hommes J; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Mullender MG
Br J Surg; 2018 Sep; 105(10):1305-1312. PubMed ID: 29663320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Acellular dermal matrix and synthetic mesh in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: Current concepts].
Billon R; Hersant B; Bosc R; Meningaud JP
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2019 Mar; 47(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30738819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical experiences with the use of ULTRAPRO
Pukancsik D; Kelemen P; Gulyás G; Újhelyi M; Kovács E; Éles K; Mészáros N; Kenessey I; Pálházi P; Kovács T; Kásler M; Mátrai Z
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1244-1251. PubMed ID: 28215734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biological or a synthetic mesh in immediate breast reconstruction? A cohort-study of long-term Health related Quality of Life (HrQoL).
Hallberg H; Elander A; Kölby L; Hansson E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1812-1816. PubMed ID: 30905394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Double-Chamber Tissue Expanders Optimize Lower Pole Expansion in Immediate Breast Reconstruction Requiring Adjuvant Radiation Therapy.
Fischer LH; Nguyen D
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76 Suppl 3():S171-4. PubMed ID: 26954736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk Factors for Complications in Immediate Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction for Non-obese Patients: Impact of Breast Size on Complications.
Woo KJ; Paik JM; Mun GH; Pyon JK; Bang SI
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Feb; 40(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 26530484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review.
Faulkner HR; Shikowitz-Behr L; McLeod M; Wright E; Hulsen J; Austen WG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Dec; 146(6):731e-736e. PubMed ID: 33234950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying risk factors for postoperative major complications in staged implant-based breast reconstruction with AlloDerm.
Remington AC; Gurtner GC; Wan DC; Nguyen D; Momeni A
Breast J; 2019 Jul; 25(4):597-603. PubMed ID: 31087378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast reconstruction using permanent Becker expander implants: an 18 year experience.
Goh SC; Thorne AL; Williams G; Laws SA; Rainsbury RM
Breast; 2012 Dec; 21(6):764-8. PubMed ID: 22497782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
