These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29876085)

  • 1. Resistance of a terrestrial plant community to local microhabitat changes.
    Tubay JM; Yoshimura J
    Ecol Evol; 2018 May; 8(10):5101-5110. PubMed ID: 29876085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microhabitat locality allows multi-species coexistence in terrestrial plant communities.
    Tubay JM; Suzuki K; Uehara T; Kakishima S; Ito H; Ishida A; Yoshida K; Mori S; Rabajante JF; Morita S; Yokozawa M; Yoshimura J
    Sci Rep; 2015 Oct; 5():15376. PubMed ID: 26483077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid transgenerational adaptation in response to intercropping reduces competition.
    Stefan L; Engbersen N; Schöb C
    Elife; 2022 Sep; 11():. PubMed ID: 36097813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enhanced species coexistence in Lotka-Volterra competition models due to nonlocal interactions.
    Andreguetto Maciel G; Martinez-Garcia R
    J Theor Biol; 2021 Dec; 530():110872. PubMed ID: 34425135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The survival analysis of a stochastic Lotka-Volterra competition model with a coexistence equilibrium.
    Xiong JJ; Li X; Wang H
    Math Biosci Eng; 2019 Mar; 16(4):2717-2737. PubMed ID: 31137234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term plant-soil feedback experiment fails to predict outcome of competition observed in long-term field experiment.
    Beckman NG; Dybzinski R; Tilman D
    Ecology; 2023 Feb; 104(2):e3883. PubMed ID: 36208059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In-stream microhabitat mosaic depicts the success of mitigation measures and controls the Ecological Potential of benthic communities in heavily modified rivers.
    Buffagni A; Barca E; Erba S; Balestrini R
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jul; 673():489-501. PubMed ID: 30995583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microhabitat and body size effects on heat tolerance: implications for responses to climate change (army ants: Formicidae, Ecitoninae).
    Baudier KM; Mudd AE; Erickson SC; O'Donnell S
    J Anim Ecol; 2015 Sep; 84(5):1322-30. PubMed ID: 26072696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Competition drives clumpy species coexistence in estuarine phytoplankton.
    Segura AM; Kruk C; Calliari D; García-Rodriguez F; Conde D; Widdicombe CE; Fort H
    Sci Rep; 2013; 3():1037. PubMed ID: 23301158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diverse phylogenetic neighborhoods enhance community resistance to drought in experimental assemblages.
    Chaves R; Ferrandis P; Escudero A; Luzuriaga AL
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22499. PubMed ID: 34795359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microhabitat change alters abundances of competing species and decreases species richness under ocean acidification.
    Nagelkerken I; Goldenberg SU; Coni EOC; Connell SD
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 645():615-622. PubMed ID: 30029136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting coexistence of plants subject to a tolerance-competition trade-off.
    Haegeman B; Sari T; Etienne RS
    J Math Biol; 2014 Jun; 68(7):1815-47. PubMed ID: 23728210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Competition and coexistence in plant communities: intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition.
    Adler PB; Smull D; Beard KH; Choi RT; Furniss T; Kulmatiski A; Meiners JM; Tredennick AT; Veblen KE
    Ecol Lett; 2018 Sep; 21(9):1319-1329. PubMed ID: 29938882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When does local spatial structure hinder competitive coexistence and reverse competitive hierarchies?
    Murrell DJ
    Ecology; 2010 Jun; 91(6):1605-16. PubMed ID: 20583703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structured interactions as a stabilizing mechanism for competitive ecological communities.
    Calleja-Solanas V; Khalil N; Gómez-Gardeñes J; Hernández-García E; Meloni S
    Phys Rev E; 2022 Dec; 106(6-1):064307. PubMed ID: 36671121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do biotic interactions shape both sides of the humped-back model of species richness in plant communities?
    Michalet R; Brooker RW; Cavieres LA; Kikvidze Z; Lortie CJ; Pugnaire FI; Valiente-Banuet A; Callaway RM
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Jul; 9(7):767-73. PubMed ID: 16796565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The importance of microhabitat for biodiversity sampling.
    Mehrabi Z; Slade EM; Solis A; Mann DJ
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114015. PubMed ID: 25469770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Niche partitioning in an assemblage of granivorous rodents, and the challenge of community-level conservation.
    Chock RY; Shier DM; Grether GF
    Oecologia; 2022 Feb; 198(2):553-565. PubMed ID: 35034220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is salamander arboreality limited by broad-scale climatic conditions?
    Baken EK; Mellenthin LE; Adams DC
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0255393. PubMed ID: 34407101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Responses of biodiversity to microhabitat heterogeneity in debris flow gullies: Assessing the impact of hydrological disturbance.
    Zhu P; Pan B; Li Z; He H; Hou Y; Zhao G
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 Dec; 902():166509. PubMed ID: 37619718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.