These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Outcomes after tissue expander exchange to implant in two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix: A retrospective cohort study. Marquez JL; French M; Ormiston L; Pires G; Martheswaran T; Eddington D; Tuncer F; Agarwal JP; Kwok AC J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Feb; 89():97-104. PubMed ID: 38160591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparative study of pre- or subpectoral expander position with the fenestrated Acellular dermal matrix anterior coverage, on drainage volume and Seroma Formation after Non-Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy. Suh YC; Kim JK; Kim NR; Choi JS; Kim YJ; Lee JH; Jun YJ J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Sep; 74(9):2237-2243. PubMed ID: 33618944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix: A 3-Year Review. Poveromo LP; Franck P; Ellison A; Janhofer DE; Asadourian PA; Otterburn DM Ann Plast Surg; 2022 May; 88(3 Suppl 3):S205-S208. PubMed ID: 35513321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions. Gabriel A; Sigalove S; Sigalove NM; Storm-Dickerson TL; Rice J; Pope N; Maxwell GP Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Apr; 38(5):519-526. PubMed ID: 29365064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety Profile and Predictors of Aesthetic Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction With Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix. Belmonte BM; Campbell CA Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jun; 86(6S Suppl 5):S585-S592. PubMed ID: 34100818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correction of animation deformity with subpectoral to prepectoral implant exchange. Lentz R; Alcon A; Sbitany H Gland Surg; 2019 Feb; 8(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 30842931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete anterior implant coverage using a single, large, square-shaped acellular dermal matrix. Hong HK; Kim YH; Lee JS; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD BMC Surg; 2022 Jun; 22(1):234. PubMed ID: 35718764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do We Need Support in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction? Comparing Outcomes with and without ADM. Salibian AA; Bekisz JM; Kussie HC; Thanik VD; Levine JP; Choi M; Karp NS Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2021 Aug; 9(8):e3745. PubMed ID: 34386310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of Life and Early Functional Evaluation in Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: A Comparative Study Between Prepectoral Versus Dual-Plane Reconstruction. Caputo GG; Zingaretti N; Kiprianidis I; Zanfisi C; Domenici L; Parodi PC; Governa M Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Aug; 21(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 33308993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early Functional Outcomes After Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Case-Matched Cohort Study. Schaeffer CV; Dassoulas KR; Thuman J; Campbell CA Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Jun; 82(6S Suppl 5):S399-S403. PubMed ID: 30570559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Difference in the outcomes of anterior tenting and wrapping techniques for acellular dermal matrix coverage in prepectoral breast reconstruction. Sohn SM; Lee HC; Park SH; Yoon ES J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Oct; 85():266-275. PubMed ID: 37536194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis. Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Splitting the Difference: Using Synthetic and Biologic Mesh to Decrease Cost in Prepectoral Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction. Karp NS; Salibian AA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):580-584. PubMed ID: 33620924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Reitsamer R; Peintinger F J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Feb; 68(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 25455288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix for Two-Staged Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: An Institutional Experience. Luo J; Willis RN; Ohlsen SM; Piccinin M; Moores N; Kwok AC; Agarwal JP Arch Plast Surg; 2022 Mar; 49(2):166-173. PubMed ID: 35832668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Prepectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction. Scheflan M; Allweis TM; Ben Yehuda D; Maisel Lotan A Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 Nov; 8(11):e3265. PubMed ID: 33299724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prepectoral breast reconstruction with complete implant coverage using double-crossed acellular dermal matrixs. Lee JS; Kim JS; Lee JH; Lee JW; Lee J; Park HY; Yang JD Gland Surg; 2019 Dec; 8(6):748-757. PubMed ID: 32042683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Broad Application of Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix Drape and Fluorescent Imaging in a Community Setting. Bilezikian JA; Tenzel PL; Bebb GG; Kays CR Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 145(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 31985606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix Increase Postoperative Complications of the First-Stage Reconstruction of Immediate Expander-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Matched Cohort Study. Woo KJ; Park JW; Mun GH; Pyon JK; Jeon BJ; Bang SI Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Oct; 79(4):341-345. PubMed ID: 28509694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]