BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29876316)

  • 1. Advanced Proton Beam Dosimetry Part I: review and performance evaluation of dose calculation algorithms.
    Saini J; Traneus E; Maes D; Regmi R; Bowen SR; Bloch C; Wong T
    Transl Lung Cancer Res; 2018 Apr; 7(2):171-179. PubMed ID: 29876316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
    Ali I; Ahmad S
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
    Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improvements in pencil beam scanning proton therapy dose calculation accuracy in brain tumor cases with a commercial Monte Carlo algorithm.
    Widesott L; Lorentini S; Fracchiolla F; Farace P; Schwarz M
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):145016. PubMed ID: 29726402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advanced proton beam dosimetry part II: Monte Carlo
    Maes D; Saini J; Zeng J; Rengan R; Wong T; Bowen SR
    Transl Lung Cancer Res; 2018 Apr; 7(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 29876310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using a realistic lung phantom.
    Schreuder AN; Bridges DS; Rigsby L; Blakey M; Janson M; Hedrick SG; Wilkinson JB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 20(12):127-137. PubMed ID: 31763759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of a hybrid Monte Carlo-Pencil Beam dose algorithm for proton therapy inverse planning.
    Barragán Montero AM; Souris K; Sanchez-Parcerisa D; Sterpin E; Lee JA
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):846-862. PubMed ID: 29159915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental benchmarking of RayStation proton dose calculation algorithms inside and outside the target region in heterogeneous phantom geometries.
    Ruangchan S; Knäusl B; Fuchs H; Georg D; Clausen M
    Phys Med; 2020 Aug; 76():182-193. PubMed ID: 32693355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurements of in-air spot size of pencil proton beam for various air gaps in conjunction with a range shifter on a ProteusPLUS PBS dedicated machine and comparison to the proton dose calculation algorithms.
    Rana S; Samuel EJJ
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2019 Sep; 42(3):853-862. PubMed ID: 31222565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiobiological and dosimetric impact of RayStation pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms on intensity-modulated proton therapy breast cancer plans.
    Rana S; Greco K; Samuel EJJ; Bennouna J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 20(8):36-46. PubMed ID: 31343826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A pencil beam algorithm for magnetic resonance image-guided proton therapy.
    Padilla-Cabal F; Georg D; Fuchs H
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29532490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A pencil beam algorithm for helium ion beam therapy.
    Fuchs H; Strobele J; Schreiner T; Hirtl A; Georg D
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6726-37. PubMed ID: 23127066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. FRoG dose computation meets Monte Carlo accuracy for proton therapy dose calculation in lung.
    Magro G; Mein S; Kopp B; Mastella E; Pella A; Ciocca M; Mairani A
    Phys Med; 2021 Jun; 86():66-74. PubMed ID: 34058719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A polar-coordinate-based pencil beam algorithm for VMAT dose computation with high-resolution gantry angle sampling.
    Tseng W; Yan G; Liu H; Kahler D; Li J; Liu C; Lu B
    Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):4026-4042. PubMed ID: 35355285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical examination of proton pencil beam scanning on a moving anthropomorphic lung phantom.
    Wang P; Tang S; Taylor PA; Cummings DE; Janson M; Traneus E; Sturgeon JD; Lee AK; Chang C
    Med Dosim; 2019 Summer; 44(2):122-129. PubMed ID: 29759487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of the normalized prescription isodose line on the magnitude of Monte Carlo vs. pencil beam target dose differences for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.
    Zheng D; Zhang Q; Liang X; Zhu X; Verma V; Wang S; Zhou S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):48-58. PubMed ID: 27455476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dosimetric comparison of iPlan
    Menon SV; Paramu R; Bhasi S; Gopalakrishnan Z; Bhaskaran S; Nair RK
    Med Dosim; 2020 Autumn; 45(3):225-234. PubMed ID: 32001069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation and clinical implementation of an accurate Monte Carlo code for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
    Huang S; Kang M; Souris K; Ainsley C; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Simone CB; Lin L
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Sep; 19(5):558-572. PubMed ID: 30058170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system.
    Lin L; Huang S; Kang M; Hiltunen P; Vanderstraeten R; Lindberg J; Siljamaki S; Wareing T; Davis I; Barnett A; McGhee J; Simone CB; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Ainsley C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):44-49. PubMed ID: 28300385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.