These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29876819)

  • 1. Manual Gene Curation and Functional Annotation.
    McDonnell E; Strasser K; Tsang A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1775():185-208. PubMed ID: 29876819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using computational predictions to improve literature-based Gene Ontology annotations: a feasibility study.
    Costanzo MC; Park J; Balakrishnan R; Cherry JM; Hong EL
    Database (Oxford); 2011; 2011():bar004. PubMed ID: 21411447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Structural and Functional Annotation of Eukaryotic Genomes with GenSAS.
    Humann JL; Lee T; Ficklin S; Main D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1962():29-51. PubMed ID: 31020553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods and strategies for gene structure curation in WormBase.
    Williams GW; Davis PA; Rogers AS; Bieri T; Ozersky P; Spieth J
    Database (Oxford); 2011; 2011():baq039. PubMed ID: 21543339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CvManGO, a method for leveraging computational predictions to improve literature-based Gene Ontology annotations.
    Park J; Costanzo MC; Balakrishnan R; Cherry JM; Hong EL
    Database (Oxford); 2012; 2012():bas001. PubMed ID: 22434836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. GASS: genome structural annotation for Eukaryotes based on species similarity.
    Wang Y; Chen L; Song N; Lei X
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Mar; 16(1):150. PubMed ID: 25764973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative Genome Annotation.
    König S; Romoth L; Stanke M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1704():189-212. PubMed ID: 29277866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. GENCODE Pseudogenes.
    Sisu C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2324():67-82. PubMed ID: 34165709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The automatic annotation of bacterial genomes.
    Richardson EJ; Watson M
    Brief Bioinform; 2013 Jan; 14(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 22408191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current challenges in genome annotation through structural biology and bioinformatics.
    Furnham N; de Beer TA; Thornton JM
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2012 Oct; 22(5):594-601. PubMed ID: 22884875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-throughput comparison, functional annotation, and metabolic modeling of plant genomes using the PlantSEED resource.
    Seaver SM; Gerdes S; Frelin O; Lerma-Ortiz C; Bradbury LM; Zallot R; Hasnain G; Niehaus TD; El Yacoubi B; Pasternak S; Olson R; Pusch G; Overbeek R; Stevens R; de Crécy-Lagard V; Ware D; Hanson AD; Henry CS
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Jul; 111(26):9645-50. PubMed ID: 24927599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A post-assembly genome-improvement toolkit (PAGIT) to obtain annotated genomes from contigs.
    Swain MT; Tsai IJ; Assefa SA; Newbold C; Berriman M; Otto TD
    Nat Protoc; 2012 Jun; 7(7):1260-84. PubMed ID: 22678431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repertoire-wide gene structure analyses: a case study comparing automatically predicted and manually annotated gene models.
    Wilbrandt J; Misof B; Panfilio KA; Niehuis O
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Oct; 20(1):753. PubMed ID: 31623555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reduce manual curation by combining gene predictions from multiple annotation engines, a case study of start codon prediction.
    Ederveen TH; Overmars L; van Hijum SA
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63523. PubMed ID: 23675487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computational Methods for Pseudogene Annotation Based on Sequence Homology.
    Harrison PM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2324():35-48. PubMed ID: 34165707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using online tools at the Bovine Genome Database to manually annotate genes in the new reference genome.
    Triant DA; Le Tourneau JJ; Diesh CM; Unni DR; Shamimuzzaman M; Walsh AT; Gardiner J; Goldkamp AK; Li Y; Nguyen HN; Roberts C; Zhao Z; Alexander LJ; Decker JE; Schnabel RD; Schroeder SG; Sonstegard TS; Taylor JF; Rivera RM; Hagen DE; Elsik CG
    Anim Genet; 2020 Oct; 51(5):675-682. PubMed ID: 32537769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Best Practices in Manual Annotation with the Gene Ontology.
    Poux S; Gaudet P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1446():41-54. PubMed ID: 27812934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Whole genome sequence and manual annotation of Clostridium autoethanogenum, an industrially relevant bacterium.
    Humphreys CM; McLean S; Schatschneider S; Millat T; Henstra AM; Annan FJ; Breitkopf R; Pander B; Piatek P; Rowe P; Wichlacz AT; Woods C; Norman R; Blom J; Goesman A; Hodgman C; Barrett D; Thomas NR; Winzer K; Minton NP
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Dec; 16():1085. PubMed ID: 26692227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating Computational Gene Ontology Annotations.
    Škunca N; Roberts RJ; Steffen M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1446():97-109. PubMed ID: 27812938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of GO annotation retrieval for BioCreAtIvE and GOA.
    Camon EB; Barrell DG; Dimmer EC; Lee V; Magrane M; Maslen J; Binns D; Apweiler R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S17. PubMed ID: 15960829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.