These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29876858)

  • 1. A simple cleanup method for the removal of humic substances from soil protein extracts using aluminum coagulation.
    Mandalakis M; Panikov NS; Polymenakou PN; Sizova MV; Stamatakis A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Aug; 25(24):23845-23856. PubMed ID: 29876858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimized Extraction Method To Remove Humic Acid Interferences from Soil Samples Prior to Microbial Proteome Measurements.
    Qian C; Hettich RL
    J Proteome Res; 2017 Jul; 16(7):2537-2546. PubMed ID: 28537741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of five soil DNA extraction methods and a rapid laboratory-developed method for quality soil DNA extraction for 16S rDNA-based amplification and library construction.
    Sagar K; Singh SP; Goutam KK; Konwar BK
    J Microbiol Methods; 2014 Feb; 97():68-73. PubMed ID: 24280193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Removal of humic substances from soil DNA using aluminium sulfate.
    Dong D; Yan A; Liu H; Zhang X; Xu Y
    J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Aug; 66(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 16377012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metaproteomics of soils from semiarid environment: functional and phylogenetic information obtained with different protein extraction methods.
    Bastida F; Hernández T; García C
    J Proteomics; 2014 Apr; 101():31-42. PubMed ID: 24530626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Isolation of high molecular weight and humic acid-free metagenomic DNA from lignocellulose-rich samples compatible for direct fosmid cloning.
    Sar A; Pal S; Dam B
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jul; 102(14):6207-6219. PubMed ID: 29846778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A method suitable for DNA extraction from humus-rich soil.
    Miao T; Gao S; Jiang S; Kan G; Liu P; Wu X; An Y; Yao S
    Biotechnol Lett; 2014 Nov; 36(11):2223-8. PubMed ID: 24980851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the compositional differences between humic fractions isolated by the IHSS and exhaustive extraction procedures.
    Chang RR; Mylotte R; Hayes MH; McLnerney R; Tzou YM
    Naturwissenschaften; 2014 Mar; 101(3):197-209. PubMed ID: 24463617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sorption of apolar aromatic compounds to soil humic acid particles affected by aluminum(III) ion Cross-Linking.
    Lu Y; Pignatello JJ
    J Environ Qual; 2004; 33(4):1314-21. PubMed ID: 15254113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Humic fractions of forest, pasture and maize crop soils resulting from microbial activity.
    Tavares RL; Nahas E
    Braz J Microbiol; 2014; 45(3):963-9. PubMed ID: 25477932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of advanced oxidation pretreatment on residual aluminum control in high humic acid water purification.
    Wang W; Li H; Ding Z; Wang X
    J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(7):1079-85. PubMed ID: 22125899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two bacterial DNA extraction methods from non-polluted and polluted soils.
    Mazziotti M; Henry S; Laval-Gilly P; Bonnefoy A; Falla J
    Folia Microbiol (Praha); 2018 Jan; 63(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 28667598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative analysis of environmental DNA extraction and purification methods from different humic acid-rich soils.
    Lakay FM; Botha A; Prior BA
    J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):265-73. PubMed ID: 17184343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A robust, cost-effective method for DNA, RNA and protein co-extraction from soil, other complex microbiomes and pure cultures.
    Thorn CE; Bergesch C; Joyce A; Sambrano G; McDonnell K; Brennan F; Heyer R; Benndorf D; Abram F
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):439-455. PubMed ID: 30565880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of phosphate on removal of humic substances by aluminum sulfate coagulant.
    Cheng WP; Chi FH; Yu RF
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2004 Apr; 272(1):153-7. PubMed ID: 14985032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Coagulation characteristics of different Al species on humic acid removal from water].
    Wu Z; Zhang PY; Zeng GM; Gao Y; Xiao HH; Zhou F
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2008 Jul; 29(7):1903-7. PubMed ID: 18828374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of pH on the coagulation performance of Al-based coagulants and residual aluminum speciation during the treatment of humic acid-kaolin synthetic water.
    Yang ZL; Gao BY; Yue QY; Wang Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Jun; 178(1-3):596-603. PubMed ID: 20188465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Innovative methods for soil DNA purification tested in soils with widely differing characteristics.
    Sagova-Mareckova M; Cermak L; Novotna J; Plhackova K; Forstova J; Kopecky J
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2008 May; 74(9):2902-7. PubMed ID: 18344341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Restoring biochemical activity and bacterial diversity in a trichloroethylene-contaminated soil: the reclamation effect of vermicomposted olive wastes.
    Moreno B; Vivas A; Nogales R; Macci C; Masciandaro G; Benitez E
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2009 May; 16(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 18751749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utilization of a Detergent-Based Method for Direct Microbial Cellular Lysis/Proteome Extraction from Soil Samples for Metaproteomics Studies.
    Chourey K; Hettich RL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1841():293-302. PubMed ID: 30259494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.