These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29876899)

  • 1. A Primer in Mendelian Randomization Methodology with a Focus on Utilizing Published Summary Association Data.
    Dimou NL; Tsilidis KK
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1793():211-230. PubMed ID: 29876899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conducting a Reproducible Mendelian Randomization Analysis Using the R Analytic Statistical Environment.
    Rasooly D; Patel CJ
    Curr Protoc Hum Genet; 2019 Apr; 101(1):e82. PubMed ID: 30645041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Application of mendelian randomization methods in causal inference of observational study].
    Lin LJ; Wei YY; Zhang RY; Chen F
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 53(6):619-624. PubMed ID: 31177761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Mendelian randomization approach, used for causal inferences].
    Wang LN; Zhang Z
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 38(4):547-552. PubMed ID: 28468080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mendelian Randomization.
    Grover S; Del Greco M F; Stein CM; Ziegler A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1666():581-628. PubMed ID: 28980266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference.
    Didelez V; Sheehan N
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2007 Aug; 16(4):309-30. PubMed ID: 17715159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mendelian Randomization using Public Data from Genetic Consortia.
    Thompson JR; Minelli C; Del Greco M F
    Int J Biostat; 2016 Nov; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 27092657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mendelian randomization with a binary exposure variable: interpretation and presentation of causal estimates.
    Burgess S; Labrecque JA
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 33(10):947-952. PubMed ID: 30039250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can we apply the Mendelian randomization methodology without considering epigenetic effects?
    Ogbuanu IU; Zhang H; Karmaus W
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2009 May; 6():3. PubMed ID: 19432981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: the design, analysis, and interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies.
    Haycock PC; Burgess S; Wade KH; Bowden J; Relton C; Davey Smith G
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2016 Apr; 103(4):965-78. PubMed ID: 26961927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mendelian randomization for nephrologists.
    Dobrijevic E; van Zwieten A; Kiryluk K; Grant AJ; Wong G; Teixeira-Pinto A
    Kidney Int; 2023 Dec; 104(6):1113-1123. PubMed ID: 37783446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mendelian Randomization versus Path Models: Making Causal Inferences in Genetic Epidemiology.
    Ziegler A; Mwambi H; König IR
    Hum Hered; 2015; 79(3-4):194-204. PubMed ID: 26201704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mendelian randomization.
    Sanderson E; Glymour MM; Holmes MV; Kang H; Morrison J; Munafò MR; Palmer T; Schooling CM; Wallace C; Zhao Q; Smith GD
    Nat Rev Methods Primers; 2022 Feb; 2():. PubMed ID: 37325194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Common Methods for Performing Mendelian Randomization.
    Teumer A
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2018; 5():51. PubMed ID: 29892602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Epidemiology, genetic epidemiology and Mendelian randomisation: more need than ever to attend to detail.
    Sheehan NA; Didelez V
    Hum Genet; 2020 Jan; 139(1):121-136. PubMed ID: 31134333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using published data in Mendelian randomization: a blueprint for efficient identification of causal risk factors.
    Burgess S; Scott RA; Timpson NJ; Davey Smith G; Thompson SG;
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 30(7):543-52. PubMed ID: 25773750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigating the transparency of reporting in two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization studies using the MR-Base platform.
    Woolf B; Di Cara N; Moreno-Stokoe C; Skrivankova V; Drax K; Higgins JPT; Hemani G; Munafò MR; Davey Smith G; Yarmolinsky J; Richmond RC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2022 Dec; 51(6):1943-1956. PubMed ID: 35383846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mendelian randomization studies of cancer risk: a literature review.
    Pierce BL; Kraft P; Zhang C
    Curr Epidemiol Rep; 2018 Jun; 5(2):184-196. PubMed ID: 30034993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limits to causal inference based on Mendelian randomization: a comparison with randomized controlled trials.
    Nitsch D; Molokhia M; Smeeth L; DeStavola BL; Whittaker JC; Leon DA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 163(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 16410347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Severity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studies.
    Harbord RM; Didelez V; Palmer TM; Meng S; Sterne JA; Sheehan NA
    Stat Med; 2013 Mar; 32(7):1246-58. PubMed ID: 23080538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.