144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29876921)
1. Sound attenuation and preferred music in the treatment of problem behavior maintained by escape from noise.
Kettering TL; Fisher WW; Kelley ME; LaRue RH
J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jul; 51(3):687-693. PubMed ID: 29876921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduction of aggression evoked by sounds using noncontingent reinforcement and time-out.
Dupuis DL; Lerman DC; Tsami L; Shireman ML
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):669-74. PubMed ID: 26118940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of variable-time delivery of food items and praise on problem behavior reinforced by escape.
Lomas JE; Fisher WW; Kelley ME
J Appl Behav Anal; 2010; 43(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 21358903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of variable-time versus contingent reinforcement delivery on problem behavior maintained by escape.
Lomas Mevers JE; Fisher WW; Kelley ME; Fredrick LD
J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(2):277-92. PubMed ID: 24764205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Noncontingent escape as treatment for self-injurious behavior maintained by negative reinforcement.
Vollmer TR; Marcus BA; Ringdahl JE
J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 7706146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of positive and negative reinforcement for compliance to treat problem behavior maintained by escape.
Slocum SK; Vollmer TR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):563-74. PubMed ID: 25969379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noncontingent reinforcement without extinction plus differential reinforcement of alternative behavior during treatment of problem behavior.
Fritz JN; Jackson LM; Stiefler NA; Wimberly BS; Richardson AR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Jul; 50(3):590-599. PubMed ID: 28513826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of procedures for unpairing conditioned reflexive motivating operations.
Kettering TL; Neef NA; Kelley ME; Heward WL
J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Mar; 109(2):422-432. PubMed ID: 29498423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior evoked by noise.
McCord BE; Iwata BA; Galensky TL; Ellingson SA; Thomson RJ
J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(4):447-62. PubMed ID: 11800184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Further evaluation of methods to identify matched stimulation.
Rapp JT
J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 17471794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Individual and combined effects of noncontingent reinforcement and response blocking on automatically reinforced problem behavior.
Saini V; Greer BD; Fisher WW; Lichtblau KR; DeSouza AA; Mitteer DR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):693-8. PubMed ID: 27029496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Noncontingent reinforcement: Arbitrary versus maintaining reinforcers for escape-maintained problem behavior.
Newman ZA; Roscoe EM; Errera NP; Davis CR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Jun; 54(3):984-1000. PubMed ID: 33667327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Some effects of noncontingent positive reinforcement on multiply controlled problem behavior and compliance in a demand context.
Ingvarsson ET; Kahng S; Hausman NL
J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(3):435-40. PubMed ID: 18816983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of preference assessment type on problem behavior.
Tung SB; Donaldson JM; Kahng S
J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Oct; 50(4):861-866. PubMed ID: 28940362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Caregiver preference for reinforcement-based interventions for problem behavior maintained by positive reinforcement.
Gabor AM; Fritz JN; Roath CT; Rothe BR; Gourley DA
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Jun; 49(2):215-27. PubMed ID: 26792408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Competition between positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape behavior.
Lalli JS; Vollmer TR; Progar PR; Wright C; Borrero J; Daniel D; Barthold CH; Tocco K; May W
J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 10513025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noncontingent Reinforcement to Improve Classroom Behavior of a Student With Developmental Disability.
Moore TC; Robinson CC; Coleman MB; Cihak DF; Park Y
Behav Modif; 2016 Jul; 40(4):640-57. PubMed ID: 26872956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An integrated model for guiding the selection of treatment components for problem behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.
Berg WK; Wacker DP; Ringdahl JE; Stricker J; Vinquist K; Salil Kumar Dutt A; Dolezal D; Luke J; Kemmerer L; Mews J
J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):617-38. PubMed ID: 26990962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noncontingent reinforcement competes with response performance.
Kelley ME; Nadler CB; Rey C; Cowie S; Podlesnik CA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 May; 107(3):343-353. PubMed ID: 28453222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
