These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29879111)

  • 1. Variation of mutational burden in healthy human tissues suggests non-random strand segregation and allows measuring somatic mutation rates.
    Werner B; Sottoriva A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Jun; 14(6):e1006233. PubMed ID: 29879111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolutionary dynamics of adult stem cells: comparison of random and immortal-strand segregation mechanisms.
    Tannenbaum E; Sherley JL; Shakhnovich EI
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Apr; 71(4 Pt 1):041914. PubMed ID: 15903708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The immortal strand hypothesis: segregation and reconstruction.
    Rando TA
    Cell; 2007 Jun; 129(7):1239-43. PubMed ID: 17604710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The (not so) immortal strand hypothesis.
    Tomasetti C; Bozic I
    Stem Cell Res; 2015 Mar; 14(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 25700960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands.
    Potten CS; Owen G; Booth D
    J Cell Sci; 2002 Jun; 115(Pt 11):2381-8. PubMed ID: 12006622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "The immortal DNA strand": difficult to digest?
    Legraverend C; Escobar M; Jay P
    Cell Stem Cell; 2010 Apr; 6(4):298-299. PubMed ID: 20362533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High incidence of non-random template strand segregation and asymmetric fate determination in dividing stem cells and their progeny.
    Conboy MJ; Karasov AO; Rando TA
    PLoS Biol; 2007 May; 5(5):e102. PubMed ID: 17439301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the immortal strand hypothesis in cancer stem cells: symmetric/self-renewal as the relevant surrogate marker of tumorigenicity.
    Winquist RJ; Hall AB; Eustace BK; Furey BF
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2014 Sep; 91(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 24971715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Immortal DNA or epigenetic signature ?].
    Rocheteau P; Tajbakhsh S
    Med Sci (Paris); 2008 Oct; 24(10):847-52. PubMed ID: 18950581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Colonic stem cell data are consistent with the immortal model of stem cell division under non-random strand segregation.
    Walters K
    Cell Prolif; 2009 Jun; 42(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 19341435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immortal DNA strand cosegregation requires p53/IMPDH-dependent asymmetric self-renewal associated with adult stem cells.
    Rambhatla L; Ram-Mohan S; Cheng JJ; Sherley JL
    Cancer Res; 2005 Apr; 65(8):3155-61. PubMed ID: 15833845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tissue-specific mutation accumulation in human adult stem cells during life.
    Blokzijl F; de Ligt J; Jager M; Sasselli V; Roerink S; Sasaki N; Huch M; Boymans S; Kuijk E; Prins P; Nijman IJ; Martincorena I; Mokry M; Wiegerinck CL; Middendorp S; Sato T; Schwank G; Nieuwenhuis EE; Verstegen MM; van der Laan LJ; de Jonge J; IJzermans JN; Vries RG; van de Wetering M; Stratton MR; Clevers H; Cuppen E; van Boxtel R
    Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7624):260-264. PubMed ID: 27698416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semiconservative quasispecies equations for polysomic genomes: the haploid case.
    Tannenbaum E; Sherley JL; Shakhnovich EI
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Aug; 241(4):791-805. PubMed ID: 16527313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cosegregation of chromosomes containing immortal DNA strands in cells that cycle with asymmetric stem cell kinetics.
    Merok JR; Lansita JA; Tunstead JR; Sherley JL
    Cancer Res; 2002 Dec; 62(23):6791-5. PubMed ID: 12460886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The mortal strand hypothesis: non-random chromosome inheritance and the biased segregation of damaged DNA.
    Charville GW; Rando TA
    Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2013; 24(8-9):653-60. PubMed ID: 23701893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asymmetric segregation of template DNA strands in basal-like human breast cancer cell lines.
    Liu W; Jeganathan G; Amiri S; Morgan KM; Ryan BM; Pine SR
    Mol Cancer; 2013 Nov; 12(1):139. PubMed ID: 24238140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asymmetric strand segregation: epigenetic costs of genetic fidelity?
    Genereux DP
    PLoS Genet; 2009 Jun; 5(6):e1000509. PubMed ID: 19503601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stem cells propagate their DNA by random segregation in the flatworm Macrostomum lignano.
    Verdoodt F; Willems M; Mouton S; De Mulder K; Bert W; Houthoofd W; Smith J; Ladurner P
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e30227. PubMed ID: 22276162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strand-seq: a unifying tool for studies of chromosome segregation.
    Falconer E; Lansdorp PM
    Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2013; 24(8-9):643-52. PubMed ID: 23665005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Symmetries and asymmetries associated with non-random segregation of sister DNA strands in Escherichia coli.
    Lopez-Vernaza MA; Leach DR
    Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2013; 24(8-9):610-7. PubMed ID: 23685127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.