186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29879111)
1. Variation of mutational burden in healthy human tissues suggests non-random strand segregation and allows measuring somatic mutation rates.
Werner B; Sottoriva A
PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Jun; 14(6):e1006233. PubMed ID: 29879111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evolutionary dynamics of adult stem cells: comparison of random and immortal-strand segregation mechanisms.
Tannenbaum E; Sherley JL; Shakhnovich EI
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Apr; 71(4 Pt 1):041914. PubMed ID: 15903708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The immortal strand hypothesis: segregation and reconstruction.
Rando TA
Cell; 2007 Jun; 129(7):1239-43. PubMed ID: 17604710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The (not so) immortal strand hypothesis.
Tomasetti C; Bozic I
Stem Cell Res; 2015 Mar; 14(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 25700960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands.
Potten CS; Owen G; Booth D
J Cell Sci; 2002 Jun; 115(Pt 11):2381-8. PubMed ID: 12006622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. "The immortal DNA strand": difficult to digest?
Legraverend C; Escobar M; Jay P
Cell Stem Cell; 2010 Apr; 6(4):298-299. PubMed ID: 20362533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. High incidence of non-random template strand segregation and asymmetric fate determination in dividing stem cells and their progeny.
Conboy MJ; Karasov AO; Rando TA
PLoS Biol; 2007 May; 5(5):e102. PubMed ID: 17439301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the immortal strand hypothesis in cancer stem cells: symmetric/self-renewal as the relevant surrogate marker of tumorigenicity.
Winquist RJ; Hall AB; Eustace BK; Furey BF
Biochem Pharmacol; 2014 Sep; 91(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 24971715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Immortal DNA or epigenetic signature ?].
Rocheteau P; Tajbakhsh S
Med Sci (Paris); 2008 Oct; 24(10):847-52. PubMed ID: 18950581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colonic stem cell data are consistent with the immortal model of stem cell division under non-random strand segregation.
Walters K
Cell Prolif; 2009 Jun; 42(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 19341435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immortal DNA strand cosegregation requires p53/IMPDH-dependent asymmetric self-renewal associated with adult stem cells.
Rambhatla L; Ram-Mohan S; Cheng JJ; Sherley JL
Cancer Res; 2005 Apr; 65(8):3155-61. PubMed ID: 15833845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tissue-specific mutation accumulation in human adult stem cells during life.
Blokzijl F; de Ligt J; Jager M; Sasselli V; Roerink S; Sasaki N; Huch M; Boymans S; Kuijk E; Prins P; Nijman IJ; Martincorena I; Mokry M; Wiegerinck CL; Middendorp S; Sato T; Schwank G; Nieuwenhuis EE; Verstegen MM; van der Laan LJ; de Jonge J; IJzermans JN; Vries RG; van de Wetering M; Stratton MR; Clevers H; Cuppen E; van Boxtel R
Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7624):260-264. PubMed ID: 27698416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semiconservative quasispecies equations for polysomic genomes: the haploid case.
Tannenbaum E; Sherley JL; Shakhnovich EI
J Theor Biol; 2006 Aug; 241(4):791-805. PubMed ID: 16527313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cosegregation of chromosomes containing immortal DNA strands in cells that cycle with asymmetric stem cell kinetics.
Merok JR; Lansita JA; Tunstead JR; Sherley JL
Cancer Res; 2002 Dec; 62(23):6791-5. PubMed ID: 12460886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The mortal strand hypothesis: non-random chromosome inheritance and the biased segregation of damaged DNA.
Charville GW; Rando TA
Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2013; 24(8-9):653-60. PubMed ID: 23701893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Asymmetric segregation of template DNA strands in basal-like human breast cancer cell lines.
Liu W; Jeganathan G; Amiri S; Morgan KM; Ryan BM; Pine SR
Mol Cancer; 2013 Nov; 12(1):139. PubMed ID: 24238140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Asymmetric strand segregation: epigenetic costs of genetic fidelity?
Genereux DP
PLoS Genet; 2009 Jun; 5(6):e1000509. PubMed ID: 19503601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stem cells propagate their DNA by random segregation in the flatworm Macrostomum lignano.
Verdoodt F; Willems M; Mouton S; De Mulder K; Bert W; Houthoofd W; Smith J; Ladurner P
PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e30227. PubMed ID: 22276162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strand-seq: a unifying tool for studies of chromosome segregation.
Falconer E; Lansdorp PM
Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2013; 24(8-9):643-52. PubMed ID: 23665005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Symmetries and asymmetries associated with non-random segregation of sister DNA strands in Escherichia coli.
Lopez-Vernaza MA; Leach DR
Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2013; 24(8-9):610-7. PubMed ID: 23685127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
