These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29879211)

  • 1. Spatial capture-recapture design and modelling for the study of small mammals.
    Romairone J; Jiménez J; Luque-Larena JJ; Mougeot F
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198766. PubMed ID: 29879211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial capture-recapture model performance with known small-mammal densities.
    Gerber BD; Parmenter RR
    Ecol Appl; 2015 Apr; 25(3):695-705. PubMed ID: 26214915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Precision and bias of spatial capture-recapture estimates: A multi-site, multi-year Utah black bear case study.
    Schmidt GM; Graves TA; Pederson JC; Carroll SL
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Jul; 32(5):e2618. PubMed ID: 35368131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatially explicit capture recapture density estimates: Robustness, accuracy and precision in a long-term study of jaguars (Panthera onca).
    Harmsen BJ; Foster RJ; Quigley H
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0227468. PubMed ID: 32511240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How does spatial study design influence density estimates from spatial capture-recapture models?
    Sollmann R; Gardner B; Belant JL
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e34575. PubMed ID: 22539949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trap configuration and spacing influences parameter estimates in spatial capture-recapture models.
    Sun CC; Fuller AK; Royle JA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88025. PubMed ID: 24505361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of spatial capture-recapture models with repurposed data: Assessing estimator robustness for retrospective applications.
    Smith JB; Stevens BS; Etter DR; Williams DM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236978. PubMed ID: 32797083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating disease survey intensity and wildlife population size from the density of survey devices: Leg-hold traps and the brushtail possum.
    Sweetapple P; Nugent G
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Nov; 159():220-226. PubMed ID: 30314786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An empirical demonstration of the effect of study design on density estimations.
    Nawaz MA; Khan BU; Mahmood A; Younas M; Din JU; Sutherland C
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):13104. PubMed ID: 34162926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal niche switching and reduced nest attendance in response to heat dissipation limits in lactating common voles (Microtus arvalis).
    van der Vinne V; Simons MJ; Reimert I; Gerkema MP
    Physiol Behav; 2014 Apr; 128():295-302. PubMed ID: 24518859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of Grizzly Bear Demographic Parameters Estimated from Non-Spatial and Spatial Open Population Capture-Recapture Models.
    Whittington J; Sawaya MA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134446. PubMed ID: 26230262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A local evaluation of the individual state-space to scale up Bayesian spatial capture-recapture.
    Milleret C; Dupont P; Bonenfant C; Brøseth H; Flagstad Ø; Sutherland C; Bischof R
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Jan; 9(1):352-363. PubMed ID: 30680119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficient estimation of abundance for patchily distributed populations via two-phase, adaptive sampling.
    Conroy MJ; Runge JP; Barker RJ; Schofield MR; Fonnesbeck CJ
    Ecology; 2008 Dec; 89(12):3362-70. PubMed ID: 19137943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating red fox density using non-invasive genetic sampling and spatial capture-recapture modelling.
    Lindsø LK; Dupont P; Rød-Eriksen L; Andersskog IPØ; Ulvund KR; Flagstad Ø; Bischof R; Eide NE
    Oecologia; 2022 Jan; 198(1):139-151. PubMed ID: 34859281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A hierarchical model for estimating the spatial distribution and abundance of animals detected by continuous-time recorders.
    Dorazio RM; Karanth KU
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176966. PubMed ID: 28520796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Examining Temporal Sample Scale and Model Choice with Spatial Capture-Recapture Models in the Common Leopard Panthera pardus.
    Goldberg JF; Tempa T; Norbu N; Hebblewhite M; Mills LS; Wangchuk TR; Lukacs P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0140757. PubMed ID: 26536231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hierarchical models for estimating density from DNA mark-recapture studies.
    Gardner B; Royle JA; Wegan MT
    Ecology; 2009 Apr; 90(4):1106-15. PubMed ID: 19449704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Small mammal trapping in tropical montane forests of the upper Nilgiris, southern India: an evaluation of capture-recapture models in estimating abundance.
    Shanker K
    J Biosci; 2000 Mar; 25(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 10824204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial capture--recapture models for jointly estimating population density and landscape connectivity.
    Royle JA; Chandler RB; Gazenski KD; Graves TA
    Ecology; 2013 Feb; 94(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 23691647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parentage assignment detects frequent and large-scale dispersal in water voles.
    Telfer S; Piertney SB; Dallas JF; Stewart WA; Marshall F; Gow JL; Lambin X
    Mol Ecol; 2003 Jul; 12(7):1939-49. PubMed ID: 12803643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.