These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29879211)

  • 21. Estimating Brownian motion dispersal rate, longevity and population density from spatially explicit mark-recapture data on tropical butterflies.
    Tufto J; Lande R; Ringsby TH; Engen S; Saether BE; Walla TR; DeVries PJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 Jul; 81(4):756-69. PubMed ID: 22320218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Gonadal hormone levels and spatial learning performance in the Morris water maze in male and female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus.
    Galea LA; Kavaliers M; Ossenkopp KP; Hampson E
    Horm Behav; 1995 Mar; 29(1):106-25. PubMed ID: 7782059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Occupancy data improves parameter precision in spatial capture-recapture models.
    Jiménez J; Díaz-Ruiz F; Monterroso P; Tobajas J; Ferreras P
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Aug; 12(8):e9250. PubMed ID: 36052294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using Continuous-Time Spatial Capture-Recapture models to make inference about animal activity patterns.
    Distiller GB; Borchers DL; Foster RJ; Harmsen BJ
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Oct; 10(20):e6822. PubMed ID: 33145005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing small-mammal trapping design using spatially explicit capture recapture (SECR) modeling on long-term monitoring data.
    Freeman CM; Barthman-Thompson L; Klinger R; Woo I; Thorne KM
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0270082. PubMed ID: 35788575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies.
    Borchers DL; Efford MG
    Biometrics; 2008 Jun; 64(2):377-85. PubMed ID: 17970815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions.
    Paterson JT; Proffitt K; Jimenez B; Rotella J; Garrott R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215458. PubMed ID: 31002709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimating population density and connectivity of American mink using spatial capture-recapture.
    Fuller AK; Sutherland CS; Royle JA; Hare MP
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Jun; 26(4):1125-35. PubMed ID: 27509753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimating the density of small mammals using the selfie trap is an effective camera trapping method.
    Gracanin A; Minchinton TE; Mikac KM
    Mamm Res; 2022; 67(4):467-482. PubMed ID: 35891629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Avian predators as a biological control system of common vole (Microtus arvalis) populations in north-western Spain: experimental set-up and preliminary results.
    Paz A; Jareño D; Arroyo L; Viñuela J; Arroyo B; Mougeot F; Luque-Larena JJ; Fargallo JA
    Pest Manag Sci; 2013 Mar; 69(3):444-50. PubMed ID: 22517676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bayes and empirical Bayes estimators of abundance and density from spatial capture-recapture data.
    Dorazio RM
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e84017. PubMed ID: 24386325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Trap array configuration influences estimates and precision of black bear density and abundance.
    Wilton CM; Puckett EE; Beringer J; Gardner B; Eggert LS; Belant JL
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e111257. PubMed ID: 25350557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A spatial capture-recapture model for group-living species.
    Emmet RL; Augustine BC; Abrahms B; Rich LN; Gardner B
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3576. PubMed ID: 34714927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Confronting spatial capture-recapture models with realistic animal movement simulations.
    Theng M; Milleret C; Bracis C; Cassey P; Delean S
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3676. PubMed ID: 35253209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Investigating effects of soil chemicals on density of small mammal bioindicators using spatial capture-recapture models.
    Gaukler SM; Murphy SM; Berryhill JT; Thompson BE; Sutter BJ; Hathcock CD
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238870. PubMed ID: 32941472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Age variation in a fluctuating population of the common vole.
    Jánová E; Heroldová M; Nesvadbová J; Bryja J; Tkadlec E
    Oecologia; 2003 Dec; 137(4):527-32. PubMed ID: 14523639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Spatial distribution and population composition of the brown mouse lemur (Microcebus rufus) in Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar, and its implications for social organization.
    Atsalis S
    Am J Primatol; 2000 May; 51(1):61-78. PubMed ID: 10811440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimal sampling design for spatial capture-recapture.
    Dupont G; Royle JA; Nawaz MA; Sutherland C
    Ecology; 2021 Mar; 102(3):e03262. PubMed ID: 33244753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An empirical evaluation of camera trapping and spatially explicit capture-recapture models for estimating chimpanzee density.
    Després-Einspenner ML; Howe EJ; Drapeau P; Kühl HS
    Am J Primatol; 2017 Jul; 79(7):. PubMed ID: 28267880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Movement and spatial organization of small mammals following vertebrate predator exclusion.
    Yunger JA
    Oecologia; 2004 May; 139(4):647-54. PubMed ID: 15042459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.