These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29879554)
21. The role of salience in young children's processing of ad hoc implicatures. Yoon EJ; Frank MC J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Oct; 186():99-116. PubMed ID: 31220753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Complex Inferential Processes Are Needed for Implicature Comprehension, but Not for Implicature Production. Mognon I; Sprenger SA; Kuijper SJM; Hendriks P Front Psychol; 2020; 11():556667. PubMed ID: 33469432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Challenges with computing scalar and ad-hoc implicatures in Mandarin-speaking 4-8-year-old autistic children. Su YE; Jiang Y J Commun Disord; 2024; 110():106427. PubMed ID: 38729067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Negation and Free Choice Inference in Child Mandarin. Huang H; Zhou P; Crain S Front Psychol; 2020; 11():591728. PubMed ID: 33192935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The role of alternative salience in the derivation of scalar implicatures. Rees A; Bott L Cognition; 2018 Jul; 176():1-14. PubMed ID: 29529396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Semantic meaning and pragmatic interpretation in 5-year-olds: evidence from real-time spoken language comprehension. Huang YT; Snedeker J Dev Psychol; 2009 Nov; 45(6):1723-39. PubMed ID: 19899927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. What do children know about the universal quantifiers all and each? Brooks PJ; Braine MD Cognition; 1996 Sep; 60(3):235-68. PubMed ID: 8870514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Some inferences still take time: Prosody, predictability, and the speed of scalar implicatures. Huang YT; Snedeker J Cogn Psychol; 2018 May; 102():105-126. PubMed ID: 29454819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. What second-language speakers can tell us about pragmatic processing. Khorsheed A; Md Rashid S; Nimehchisalem V; Geok Imm L; Price J; Ronderos CR PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263724. PubMed ID: 35180247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Scalar and ad-hoc pragmatic inferences in children: guess which one is easier. Foppolo F; Mazzaggio G; Panzeri F; Surian L J Child Lang; 2021 Mar; 48(2):350-372. PubMed ID: 32519623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Beyond words: Pragmatic inference in behavioral variant of frontotemporal degeneration. Spotorno N; McMillan CT; Rascovsky K; Irwin DJ; Clark R; Grossman M Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():556-64. PubMed ID: 26150205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. When some is not every: dissociating scalar implicature generation and mismatch. Shetreet E; Chierchia G; Gaab N Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Apr; 35(4):1503-14. PubMed ID: 23568365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Slowdowns in scalar implicature processing: Isolating the intention-reading costs in the Bott & Noveck task. Ronderos CR; Noveck I Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105480. PubMed ID: 37210877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Children's Acquisition of Homogeneity in Plural Definite Descriptions. Tieu L; Križ M; Chemla E Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2329. PubMed ID: 31780976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences. Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comprehending conjunctive entailment of disjunction among individuals with Asperger syndrome. Liu CT; Chen LM Clin Linguist Phon; 2019; 33(9):869-883. PubMed ID: 30889988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Inference vs control sentences: are readers able to detect our intended differences? Shears C; Weiss E Brain Cogn; 2005 Mar; 57(2):195-7. PubMed ID: 15708216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Do Adults Show an Effect of Delayed First Language Acquisition When Calculating Scalar Implicatures? Davidson K; Mayberry RI Lang Acquis; 2015; 22(4):329-354. PubMed ID: 26997850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Are scalar implicatures automatically processed and different for each individual? A mismatch negativity (MMN) study. Zhao M; Liu T; Chen G; Chen F Brain Res; 2015 Mar; 1599():137-49. PubMed ID: 25542387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Priming scalar and ad hoc enrichment in children. Rees A; Carter E; Bott L Cognition; 2023 Oct; 239():105572. PubMed ID: 37494789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]