These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29880666)

  • 1. No bias found in NIH reviews.
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2018 Jun; 360(6393):1055. PubMed ID: 29880666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gender bias goes away when grant reviewers focus on the science.
    Guglielmi G
    Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7690):14-15. PubMed ID: 29388971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Little race or gender bias in an experiment of initial review of NIH R01 grant proposals.
    Forscher PS; Cox WTL; Brauer M; Devine PG
    Nat Hum Behav; 2019 Mar; 3(3):257-264. PubMed ID: 30953009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Racial bias continues to haunt NIH grants.
    Check Hayden E
    Nature; 2015 Nov; 527(7578):286-7. PubMed ID: 26581270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex as a Biological Variable: Now What?!
    Miller VM; Reckelhoff JF
    Physiology (Bethesda); 2016 Mar; 31(2):78-80. PubMed ID: 26865575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reviewing Peer Review at the NIH.
    Lauer MS; Nakamura R
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Nov; 373(20):1893-5. PubMed ID: 26559568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disparities Research, Disparities Researchers, and Health Equity.
    Carnethon MR; Kershaw KN; Kandula NR
    JAMA; 2020 Jan; 323(3):211-212. PubMed ID: 31841578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review at NIH.
    Osthus RC
    Physiologist; 2007 Oct; 50(5):185, 187. PubMed ID: 17990627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. NIH consultant finds little evidence of bias against clinical researchers.
    Brainard J
    Chron High Educ; 2005 Mar; 51(28):A23. PubMed ID: 15835080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. NIH weighs peer review changes.
    Lang L
    Gastroenterology; 2008 Feb; 134(2):380. PubMed ID: 18242202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NIH goes back to college for peer review.
    Dolgin E
    Nat Med; 2010 Feb; 16(2):143. PubMed ID: 20134456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overhaul of peer review at NIH.
    Fusaro RM
    Lancet; 1999 Nov; 354(9190):1649. PubMed ID: 10560706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?
    Kaatz A; Lee YG; Potvien A; Magua W; Filut A; Bhattacharya A; Leatherberry R; Zhu X; Carnes M
    Acad Med; 2016 Aug; 91(8):1080-8. PubMed ID: 27276003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cautious welcome to NIH peer review reforms.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):269. PubMed ID: 8183356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NIH announces pilot effort to shorten peer review cycle of research applications.
    J Investig Med; 2006 Mar; 54(2):52. PubMed ID: 16532545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correction: Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores.
    PLOS ONE Staff
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0132202. PubMed ID: 26121031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changes urged in NIH peer review process.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Nov; 372(6503):209. PubMed ID: 7969455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NIH. Protests win challenge to peer-review proposal.
    Agnew B
    Science; 1999 Nov; 286(5444):1453-4. PubMed ID: 10610539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Greater Representation of African-American/Black Scientists in the National Institutes of Health Review Process Will Improve Adolescent Health.
    Guy MC; Afifi RA; Eissenberg T; Fagan P
    J Adolesc Health; 2020 Nov; 67(5):631-632. PubMed ID: 33099412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research funding: peer review at NIH.
    Scarpa T
    Science; 2006 Jan; 311(5757):41. PubMed ID: 16400135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.