These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29881012)

  • 1. Kernel Equating Under the Non-Equivalent Groups With Covariates Design.
    Wiberg M; Bränberg K
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jul; 39(5):349-361. PubMed ID: 29881012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Item Response Theory Observed-Score Kernel Equating.
    Andersson B; Wiberg M
    Psychometrika; 2017 Mar; 82(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 27743280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Comparison of IRT Observed Score Kernel Equating and Several Equating Methods.
    Wang S; Zhang M; You S
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():308. PubMed ID: 32210877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How Important is the Choice of Bandwidth in Kernel Equating?
    Wallin G; Häggström J; Wiberg M
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Oct; 45(7-8):518-535. PubMed ID: 34866710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparative Evaluation of Kernel Equating and Test Characteristic Curve Equating.
    De Ayala RJ; Smith B; Norman Dvorak R
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Mar; 42(2):155-168. PubMed ID: 29881117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linking With External Covariates: Examining Accuracy by Anchor Type, Test Length, Ability Difference, and Sample Size.
    Albano AD; Wiberg M
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Nov; 43(8):597-610. PubMed ID: 31551638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standard Errors of Kernel Equating: Accounting for Bandwidth Estimation.
    Marcq K; Andersson B
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 May; 46(3):200-218. PubMed ID: 35528269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The comparison of the scores obtained by Bayesian nonparametric model and classical test theory methods.
    Yurtcu M; Kelecioglu H; Boone EL
    Sci Prog; 2021; 104(3):368504211028371. PubMed ID: 34236901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Local Equating of Cognitively Diagnostic Modeled Observed Scores.
    Xin T; Zhang J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jan; 39(1):44-61. PubMed ID: 29880993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining Potential Boundary Bias Effects in Kernel Smoothing on Equating: An Introduction for the Adaptive and Epanechnikov Kernels.
    Cid JA; von Davier AA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 May; 39(3):208-222. PubMed ID: 29881003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Item response theory test equating in health sciences education.
    Guilera G; Gómez J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 16847729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reading Comprehension Tests for Children: Test Equating and Specific Age-Interval Reports.
    Lúcio PS; Lourenço FC; Cogo-Moreira H; Bandalos D; de Carvalho CAF; Kida ASB; de Ávila CRB
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():662192. PubMed ID: 34566750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparisons of item difficulty and passing scores by test equating in a basic medical education curriculum.
    Hwang JE; Kim NJ; Kim SY
    Korean J Med Educ; 2019 Jun; 31(2):147-157. PubMed ID: 31230437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternative Linear Item Response Theory Observed-Score Equating Methods.
    Wiberg M
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 May; 40(3):180-199. PubMed ID: 29881047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Test equating sleep scales: applying the Leunbach's model.
    Adroher ND; Kreiner S; Young C; Mills R; Tennant A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):141. PubMed ID: 31286889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longitudinal stability of IRT and equivalent-groups linear and equipercentile equating.
    Zhang X; McDermott PA; Fantuzzo JW; Gadsden VL
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Aug; 113(1):1303-25. PubMed ID: 24340818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Equating scores using bridging stations on the clinical performance examination].
    Yoo DM; Han JJ
    Korean J Med Educ; 2013 Jun; 25(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 25804693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Equating Errors and Scale Drift in Linked-Chain IRT Equating with Mixed-Format Tests.
    Hu B
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 29561741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A primer-test centered equating method for setting cut-off scores.
    Zhu W; Plowman SA; Park Y
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2010 Dec; 81(4):400-9. PubMed ID: 21268463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Equating of multi-facet tests across administrations.
    Lunz M; Suanthong S
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 22089509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.