BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

34 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29881017)

  • 1. Exploring Multiple Strategic Problem Solving Behaviors in Educational Psychology Research by Using Mixture Cognitive Diagnosis Model.
    Zhang J; Lu J; Yang J; Zhang Z; Sun S
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():568348. PubMed ID: 34149491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Constrained Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm for Q Matrix Estimation in DINA Models.
    Liu CW; Andersson B; Skrondal A
    Psychometrika; 2020 Jun; 85(2):322-357. PubMed ID: 32632838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonparametric CD-CAT for multiple-choice items: Item selection method and Q-optimality.
    Wang Y; Chiu CY; Köhn HF
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38794963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing Item-Level Fit for the DINA Model.
    Wang C; Shu Z; Shang Z; Xu G
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Oct; 39(7):525-538. PubMed ID: 29881024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Q-Matrix Refinement Based on Item Fit Statistic RMSEA.
    Kang C; Yang Y; Zeng P
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):527-542. PubMed ID: 31534288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic Classification Models for Testlets: Methods and Theory.
    Xu X; Fang G; Guo J; Ying Z; Zhang S
    Psychometrika; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38528268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reconsidering Cutoff Points in the General Method of Empirical Q-Matrix Validation.
    Nájera P; Sorrel MA; Abad FJ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Aug; 79(4):727-753. PubMed ID: 32655181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling Incorporating Item-Level Missing Data Mechanism.
    Shan N; Wang X
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():564707. PubMed ID: 33329195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating Cognitive Diagnosis Models in Small Samples: Bayes Modal Estimation and Monotonic Constraints.
    Ma W; Jiang Z
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Mar; 45(2):95-111. PubMed ID: 33627916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sufficient and Necessary Conditions for the Identifiability of DINA Models with Polytomous Responses.
    Lin M; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2024 Jun; 89(2):717-740. PubMed ID: 38517594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving Robustness in Q-Matrix Validation Using an Iterative and Dynamic Procedure.
    Nájera P; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J; Abad FJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Sep; 44(6):431-446. PubMed ID: 32788815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated Test Assembly for Multistage Testing With Cognitive Diagnosis.
    Li G; Cai Y; Gao X; Wang D; Tu D
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():509844. PubMed ID: 34025486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Explanatory Cognitive Diagnosis Models Incorporating Item Features.
    Liao M; Jiao H; He Q
    J Intell; 2024 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 38535166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Cognitive Diagnosis Model for Identifying Coexisting Skills and Misconceptions.
    Kuo BC; Chen CH; de la Torre J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 May; 42(3):179-191. PubMed ID: 29881120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Erratum: A Constrained Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm for Q Matrix Estimation in DINA Models.
    Liu CW; Andersson B; Skrondal A
    Psychometrika; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38753255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitively Based Multiple-Choice Data.
    Yigit HD; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jul; 43(5):388-401. PubMed ID: 31235984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Test designs and modeling under the general nominal diagnosis model framework.
    Chen J; Zhou H
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0180016. PubMed ID: 28644865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DINA Models for Multiple-Choice Items With Few Parameters: Considering Incorrect Answers.
    Ozaki K
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Sep; 39(6):431-447. PubMed ID: 29881017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
    Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.