These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29881024)

  • 1. Assessing Item-Level Fit for the DINA Model.
    Wang C; Shu Z; Shang Z; Xu G
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Oct; 39(7):525-538. PubMed ID: 29881024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Seo DG; Kim JK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():15. PubMed ID: 34225413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utilizing response times in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing under the higher-order deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate model.
    Huang HY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):109-141. PubMed ID: 30793768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing fit of alternative unidimensional polytomous IRT models using posterior predictive model checking.
    Li T; Xie C; Jiao H
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):397-408. PubMed ID: 27243448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining Parameter Invariance in a General Diagnostic Classification Model.
    Ravand H; Baghaei P; Doebler P
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2930. PubMed ID: 31998189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Constrained Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro Algorithm for Q Matrix Estimation in DINA Models.
    Liu CW; Andersson B; Skrondal A
    Psychometrika; 2020 Jun; 85(2):322-357. PubMed ID: 32632838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating the DINA model parameters using the No-U-Turn Sampler.
    da Silva MA; de Oliveira ESB; von Davier AA; Bazán JL
    Biom J; 2018 Mar; 60(2):352-368. PubMed ID: 29194715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DINA Models for Multiple-Choice Items With Few Parameters: Considering Incorrect Answers.
    Ozaki K
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Sep; 39(6):431-447. PubMed ID: 29881017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the Fit of Sequential G-DINA Model Using Limited-Information Measures.
    Ma W
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 May; 44(3):167-181. PubMed ID: 32341605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Item-Fit Statistic Based on Posterior Probabilities of Membership in Ability Groups.
    Kondratek B
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Sep; 46(6):462-478. PubMed ID: 35991828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of fit of the time-varying dynamic partial credit model using the posterior predictive model checking method.
    Castro-Alvarez S; Sinharay S; Bringmann LF; Meijer RR; Tendeiro JN
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38379504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Plausible-Value Imputation Statistics for Detecting Item Misfit.
    Chalmers RP; Ng V
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Jul; 41(5):372-387. PubMed ID: 29882543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Posterior Predictive Model Checking Method Assuming Posterior Normality for Item Response Theory.
    Kuhfeld M
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Mar; 43(2):125-142. PubMed ID: 30792560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.
    Ma W; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):142-163. PubMed ID: 30723890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Using Bayesian Nonparametric Item Response Function Estimation to Check Parametric Model Fit.
    Wang W; Kingston N
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jul; 44(5):331-345. PubMed ID: 32879534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.
    Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic Classification Models for Testlets: Methods and Theory.
    Xu X; Fang G; Guo J; Ying Z; Zhang S
    Psychometrika; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38528268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Hellinger Distance within Posterior Predictive Assessment for Investigating Multidimensionality in IRT Models.
    Matteucci M; Mignani S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(4):627-648. PubMed ID: 32310003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Semi-supervised Learning-Based Diagnostic Classification Method Using Artificial Neural Networks.
    Xue K; Bradshaw LP
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():618336. PubMed ID: 33551928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.