These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29881044)

  • 1. On Computing the Key Probability in the Stochastically Curtailed Sequential Probability Ratio Test.
    Huebner AR; Finkelman MD
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Mar; 40(2):142-156. PubMed ID: 29881044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The stochastically curtailed generalized likelihood ratio: A new termination criterion for variable-length computerized classification tests.
    Huebner AR; Fina AD
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Jun; 47(2):549-61. PubMed ID: 24907003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stopping rules for multi-category computerized classification testing.
    Wang C; Chen P; Huebner A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 May; 74(2):184-202. PubMed ID: 32240554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving test efficiency for a grid multidimensional computerized classification test by the application of a conditional latent-trait distribution to a sequential probability ratio test.
    Liu TH; Chen CT; Cheng CP; Shih CL
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Oct; 54(5):2565-2578. PubMed ID: 34918218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Termination Criteria for Grid Multiclassification Adaptive Testing With Multidimensional Polytomous Items.
    Wang Z; Wang C; Weiss DJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Oct; 46(7):551-570. PubMed ID: 36131841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utilizing Response Times in Computerized Classification Testing.
    Sie H; Finkelman MD; Riley B; Smits N
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jul; 39(5):389-405. PubMed ID: 29881015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing for Classifying Examinees With Within-Dimensionality.
    van Groen MM; Eggen TJHM; Veldkamp BP
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Sep; 40(6):387-404. PubMed ID: 29881061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using transcription-based detectors to emulate the behavior of sequential probability ratio-based concentration detectors.
    Chou CT
    Phys Rev E; 2022 Nov; 106(5-1):054403. PubMed ID: 36559424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stochastic Curtailment in Adaptive Mastery Testing: Improving the Efficiency of Confidence Interval-Based Stopping Rules.
    Sie H; Finkelman MD; Bartroff J; Thompson NA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jun; 39(4):278-292. PubMed ID: 29881008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Sequential Probability Ratio Test: An efficient alternative to exact binomial testing for Clean Water Act 303(d) evaluation.
    Chen C; Gribble MO; Bartroff J; Bay SM; Goldstein L
    J Environ Manage; 2017 May; 192():89-93. PubMed ID: 28142127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the efficiency of the independent segments procedure: A direct comparison with sequential probability ratio tests.
    Erdfelder E; Schnuerch M
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):501-506. PubMed ID: 34726467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficiency in sequential testing: Comparing the sequential probability ratio test and the sequential Bayes factor test.
    Stefan AM; Schönbrodt FD; Evans NJ; Wagenmakers EJ
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Dec; 54(6):3100-3117. PubMed ID: 35233752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of an examinee's ability in the web-based computerized adaptive testing program IRT-CAT.
    Lee YH; Park JH; Park IY
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2006; 3():4. PubMed ID: 19223996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of one-sample two-sided sequential t-tests for application in epidemiological studies.
    van der Tweel I; Kaaks R; van Noord PA
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2781-95. PubMed ID: 8981686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hybrid Threshold-Based Sequential Procedures for Detecting Compromised Items in a Computerized Adaptive Testing Licensure Exam.
    Lee C; Qian H
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Aug; 82(4):782-810. PubMed ID: 35754614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Location-Matching Adaptive Testing for Polytomous Technology-Enhanced Items.
    Kang HA; Arbet G; Betts J; Muntean W
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2024 Mar; 48(1-2):57-76. PubMed ID: 38327610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Look-ahead content balancing method in variable-length computerized classification testing.
    Li X; Zhang J; Chang HH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):88-108. PubMed ID: 30912585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].
    ; ;
    Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 47(2):101-119. PubMed ID: 38309959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing the Misclassification Costs of Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing: Item Selection With Minimum Expected Risk.
    Hsu CL; Wang WC
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 May; 46(3):185-199. PubMed ID: 35528270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detecting Signals of Disproportionate Reporting from Singapore's Spontaneous Adverse Event Reporting System: An Application of the Sequential Probability Ratio Test.
    Chan CL; Rudrappa S; Ang PS; Li SC; Evans SJW
    Drug Saf; 2017 Aug; 40(8):703-713. PubMed ID: 28455793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.