These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29881054)

  • 1. Maximum Likelihood Score Estimation Method With Fences for Short-Length Tests and Computerized Adaptive Tests.
    Han KT
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Jun; 40(4):289-301. PubMed ID: 29881054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On Latent Trait Estimation in Multidimensional Compensatory Item Response Models.
    Wang C
    Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):428-49. PubMed ID: 24604245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Item exposure control for multidimensional computer adaptive testing under maximum likelihood and expected a posteriori estimation.
    Huebner AR; Wang C; Quinlan K; Seubert L
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Dec; 48(4):1443-1453. PubMed ID: 26487053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using a Response Time-Based Expected A Posteriori Estimator to Control for Differential Speededness in Computerized Adaptive Test.
    Kern JL; Choe E
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Jul; 45(5):361-385. PubMed ID: 34565941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Best Design for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With the Bifactor Model.
    Seo DG; Weiss DJ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Dec; 75(6):954-978. PubMed ID: 29795848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A New Online Calibration Method Based on Lord's Bias-Correction.
    He Y; Chen P; Li Y; Zhang S
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Sep; 41(6):456-471. PubMed ID: 29882532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microbial-Maximum Likelihood Estimation Tool for Microbial Quantification in Food From Left-Censored Data Using Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Microbial Risk Assessment.
    Bahk GJ; Lee HJ
    Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():730733. PubMed ID: 35002994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prior Distribution and Entropy in Computer Adaptive Testing Ability Estimation through MAP or EAP.
    Suárez-Cansino J; López-Morales V; Morales-Manilla LR; Alberto-Rodríguez A; Ramos-Fernández JC
    Entropy (Basel); 2022 Dec; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 36673191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevention Effects and Possible Molecular Mechanism of Mulberry Leaf Extract and its Formulation on Rats with Insulin-Insensitivity.
    Liu Y; Li X; Xie C; Luo X; Bao Y; Wu B; Hu Y; Zhong Z; Liu C; Li M
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0152728. PubMed ID: 27054886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fast estimation of diffusion tensors under Rician noise by the EM algorithm.
    Liu J; Gasbarra D; Railavo J
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Jan; 257():147-58. PubMed ID: 26456357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shrinkage estimation of effect sizes as an alternative to hypothesis testing followed by estimation in high-dimensional biology: applications to differential gene expression.
    Montazeri Z; Yanofsky CM; Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article23. PubMed ID: 20597849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rasch Model Parameter Estimation in the Presence of a Nonnormal Latent Trait Using a Nonparametric Bayesian Approach.
    Finch H; Edwards JM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Aug; 76(4):662-684. PubMed ID: 29795882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximum likelihood blood velocity estimator incorporating properties of flow physics.
    Schlaikjer M; Jensen JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2004 Jan; 51(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 14995019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Bayesian Expectation-Maximization-Maximization for the 3PLM.
    Guo S; Zheng C
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1175. PubMed ID: 31214067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simulation study of activities of daily living functions using online computerized adaptive testing.
    Chien TW; Lin WS
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Oct; 16(1):130. PubMed ID: 27724939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Estimation Procedures for Multilevel AR(1) Models.
    Krone T; Albers CJ; Timmerman ME
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():486. PubMed ID: 27242559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A New Online Calibration Method for Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Chen P; Wang C
    Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):674-701. PubMed ID: 26608960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Usability of CAT System for Assessing the Depressive Level of Japanese-A Study on Psychometric Properties and Response Behavior.
    Iwata N; Kikuchi K; Fujihara Y
    Int J Behav Med; 2016 Aug; 23(4):427-37. PubMed ID: 26272358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conducting simulation studies for computerized adaptive testing using SimulCAT: an instructional piece.
    Han KCT
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():20. PubMed ID: 30114899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. www.common-metrics.org: a web application to estimate scores from different patient-reported outcome measures on a common scale.
    Fischer HF; Rose M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):142. PubMed ID: 27760525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.