149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29881066)
1. A Dominance Variant Under the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise-Preference Framework: Model Formulation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation.
Morillo D; Leenen I; Abad FJ; Hontangas P; de la Torre J; Ponsoda V
Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Oct; 40(7):500-516. PubMed ID: 29881066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modeling Multidimensional Forced Choice Measures with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Item Response Theory Model.
Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(2):241-261. PubMed ID: 34370564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of parameter estimation approaches for multi-unidimensional pairwise preference tests.
Tu N; Joo S; Lee P; Stark S
Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):2764-2786. PubMed ID: 35931936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Hierarchical Multi-Unidimensional IRT Approach for Analyzing Sparse, Multi-Group Data for Integrative Data Analysis.
Huo Y; de la Torre J; Mun EY; Kim SY; Ray AE; Jiao Y; White HR
Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):834-55. PubMed ID: 25265910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats.
Lee H; Smith WZ
Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):578-603. PubMed ID: 32425220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing Traditional and IRT Scoring of Forced-Choice Tests.
Hontangas PM; de la Torre J; Ponsoda V; Leenen I; Morillo D; Abad FJ
Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Nov; 39(8):598-612. PubMed ID: 29881030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can High-Dimensional Questionnaires Resolve the Ipsativity Issue of Forced-Choice Response Formats?
Schulte N; Holling H; Bürkner PC
Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Apr; 81(2):262-289. PubMed ID: 37929263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between pystan and numpyro in Bayesian item response theory: evaluation of agreement of estimated latent parameters and sampling performance.
Nishio M; Ota E; Matsuo H; Matsunaga T; Miyazaki A; Murakami T
PeerJ Comput Sci; 2023; 9():e1620. PubMed ID: 37869462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models.
Bürkner PC; Schulte N; Holling H
Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 79(5):827-854. PubMed ID: 31488915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Item Response Models for Forced-Choice Questionnaires: A Common Framework.
Brown A
Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):135-60. PubMed ID: 25663304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A 2PLM-RANK multidimensional forced-choice model and its fast estimation algorithm.
Zheng C; Liu J; Li Y; Xu P; Zhang B; Wei R; Zhang W; Liu B; Huang J
Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38409459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. GGUM-RANK Statement and Person Parameter Estimation With Multidimensional Forced Choice Triplets.
Lee P; Joo SH; Stark S; Chernyshenko OS
Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 May; 43(3):226-240. PubMed ID: 31019358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Lognormal Ipsative Model for Multidimensional Compositional Items.
Chen CW; Wang WC; Mok MMC; Scherer R
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():573252. PubMed ID: 34712161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rasch Model Parameter Estimation in the Presence of a Nonnormal Latent Trait Using a Nonparametric Bayesian Approach.
Finch H; Edwards JM
Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Aug; 76(4):662-684. PubMed ID: 29795882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian Prior Choice in IRT Estimation Using MCMC and Variational Bayes.
Natesan P; Nandakumar R; Minka T; Rubright JD
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1422. PubMed ID: 27729878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Item Response Theory Models for Ipsative Tests With Multidimensional Pairwise Comparison Items.
Wang WC; Qiu XL; Chen CW; Ro S; Jin KY
Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Nov; 41(8):600-613. PubMed ID: 29881107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integration of the Forced-Choice Questionnaire and the Likert Scale: A Simulation Study.
Xiao Y; Liu H; Li H
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():806. PubMed ID: 28572781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fitting a Thurstonian IRT model to forced-choice data using Mplus.
Brown A; Maydeu-Olivares A
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1135-47. PubMed ID: 22733226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Controlling for Response Biases in Self-Report Scales: Forced-Choice vs. Psychometric Modeling of Likert Items.
Kreitchmann RS; Abad FJ; Ponsoda V; Nieto MD; Morillo D
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2309. PubMed ID: 31681103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigating the Normativity of Trait Estimates from Multidimensional Forced-Choice Data.
Frick S; Brown A; Wetzel E
Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 34464217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
