These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29881082)

  • 1. Linking Methods for the Zinnes-Griggs Pairwise Preference IRT Model.
    Lee P; Joo SH; Stark S
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Mar; 41(2):130-144. PubMed ID: 29881082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling Multidimensional Forced Choice Measures with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Item Response Theory Model.
    Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(2):241-261. PubMed ID: 34370564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Linking Methods for Multidimensional Forced Choice Tests Using the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise Preference Model.
    Tu N; Kumar LS; Joo S; Stark S
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2024 May; 48(3):104-124. PubMed ID: 38585303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MCMC Z-G: An IRT Computer Program for Forced-Choice Noncognitive Measurement.
    Wang W; Lee P; Joo SH; Stark S; Louden R
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Oct; 40(7):551-553. PubMed ID: 29881069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of parameter estimation approaches for multi-unidimensional pairwise preference tests.
    Tu N; Joo S; Lee P; Stark S
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Sep; 55(6):2764-2786. PubMed ID: 35931936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating Anchor-Item Designs for Concurrent Calibration With the GGUM.
    Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Mar; 41(2):83-96. PubMed ID: 29881079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Dominance Variant Under the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise-Preference Framework: Model Formulation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation.
    Morillo D; Leenen I; Abad FJ; Hontangas P; de la Torre J; Ponsoda V
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Oct; 40(7):500-516. PubMed ID: 29881066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian Random Block Item Response Theory Model for Forced-Choice Formats.
    Lee H; Smith WZ
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):578-603. PubMed ID: 32425220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating the Impact of Item Parameter Drift for Item Response Theory Models with Mixture Distributions.
    Park YS; Lee YS; Xing K
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():255. PubMed ID: 26941699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Item response theory in high-stakes pharmacy assessments.
    Wolcott MD; Olsen AA; Augustine JM
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2022 Sep; 14(9):1206-1214. PubMed ID: 36154966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practical Consequences of Item Response Theory Model Misfit in the Context of Test Equating with Mixed-Format Test Data.
    Zhao Y; Hambleton RK
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():484. PubMed ID: 28421011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing five depression measures in depressed Chinese patients using item response theory: an examination of item properties, measurement precision and score comparability.
    Zhao Y; Chan W; Lo BC
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):60. PubMed ID: 28372559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing Traditional and IRT Scoring of Forced-Choice Tests.
    Hontangas PM; de la Torre J; Ponsoda V; Leenen I; Morillo D; Abad FJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Nov; 39(8):598-612. PubMed ID: 29881030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linking of Rasch-Scaled Tests: Consequences of Limited Item Pools and Model Misfit.
    Fischer L; Rohm T; Carstensen CH; Gnambs T
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():633896. PubMed ID: 34295279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GGUM-RANK Statement and Person Parameter Estimation With Multidimensional Forced Choice Triplets.
    Lee P; Joo SH; Stark S; Chernyshenko OS
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 May; 43(3):226-240. PubMed ID: 31019358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anchor Selection Strategies for DIF Analysis: Review, Assessment, and New Approaches.
    Kopf J; Zeileis A; Strobl C
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Feb; 75(1):22-56. PubMed ID: 29795811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asymptotic Variance of Linking Coefficient Estimators for Polytomous IRT Models.
    Andersson B
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 May; 42(3):192-205. PubMed ID: 29881121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two item response theory models for analysing normative forced-choice personality items.
    Ferrando PJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):379-95. PubMed ID: 17067417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions.
    Teresi JA; Wang C; Kleinman M; Jones RN; Weiss DJ
    Psychometrika; 2021 Sep; 86(3):674-711. PubMed ID: 34251615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the equivalence of Web-based and paper-and-pencil questionnaires using differential item and test functioning (DIF and DTF) analysis: a case of the Four-Dimensional Symptom Questionnaire (4DSQ).
    Terluin B; Brouwers EPM; Marchand MAG; de Vet HCW
    Qual Life Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1191-1200. PubMed ID: 29468387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.