These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29881103)

  • 1. Entropy-Based Measures for Person Fit in Item Response Theory.
    Dardick WR; Weiss BA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Oct; 41(7):512-529. PubMed ID: 29881103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Entropy-Based Measure for Assessing Fuzziness in Logistic Regression.
    Weiss BA; Dardick W
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Dec; 76(6):986-1004. PubMed ID: 29795897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnosing item score patterns on a test using item response theory-based person-fit statistics.
    Meijer RR
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):72-87. PubMed ID: 12741674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Impact of Test and Sample Characteristics on Model Selection and Classification Accuracy in the Multilevel Mixture IRT Model.
    Sen S; Cohen AS
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():197. PubMed ID: 32116973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying Person-Fit Latent Classes, and Explanation of Categorical and Continuous Person Misfit.
    Conijn JM; Sijtsma K; Emons WHM
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Mar; 40(2):128-141. PubMed ID: 29881043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Practical Consequences of Item Response Theory Model Misfit in the Context of Test Equating with Mixed-Format Test Data.
    Zhao Y; Hambleton RK
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():484. PubMed ID: 28421011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Evaluation of Fit Indices Used in Model Selection of Dichotomous Mixture IRT Models.
    Sen S; Cohen AS
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Jun; 84(3):481-509. PubMed ID: 38756464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating Person Fit for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment.
    Cui Y; Li J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 May; 39(3):223-238. PubMed ID: 29881004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of IRT item misfit on score estimates and severity classifications: an examination of PROMIS depression and pain interference item banks.
    Zhao Y
    Qual Life Res; 2017 Mar; 26(3):555-564. PubMed ID: 27909853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Practical Significance of Item Misfit in Educational Assessments.
    Köhler C; Hartig J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Jul; 41(5):388-400. PubMed ID: 29881098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relationships Among Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory Frameworks via Factor Analytic Models.
    Kohli N; Koran J; Henn L
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Jun; 75(3):389-405. PubMed ID: 29795826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advancing the Bayesian Approach for Multidimensional Polytomous and Nominal IRT Models: Model Formulations and Fit Measures.
    Chen J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Jan; 41(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 29881075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing fit of alternative unidimensional polytomous IRT models using posterior predictive model checking.
    Li T; Xie C; Jiao H
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):397-408. PubMed ID: 27243448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample Size Requirements for Applying Mixed Polytomous Item Response Models: Results of a Monte Carlo Simulation Study.
    Kutscher T; Eid M; Crayen C
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2494. PubMed ID: 31798490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Asymptotically Normally Distributed Person Fit Indices for Detecting Spuriously High Scores on Difficult Items.
    Xia Y; Zheng Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Jul; 42(5):343-358. PubMed ID: 30034053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian Robust IRT Outlier-Detection Model.
    Öztürk NK; Karabatsos G
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 May; 41(3):195-208. PubMed ID: 29881088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting and Explaining Aberrant Responding to the Outcome Questionnaire-45.
    Conijn JM; Emons WH; De Jong K; Sijtsma K
    Assessment; 2015 Aug; 22(4):513-24. PubMed ID: 25520211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Development of Two New Computer Adaptive Tests To Evaluate Feelings of Loss in Caregivers of Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: TBI-CareQOL Feelings of Loss-Self and Feelings of Loss-Person With Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Carlozzi NE; Kallen MA; Ianni PA; Sander AM; Hahn EA; Lange RT; Brickell TA; French LM; Miner JA; Hanks R
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2019 Apr; 100(4S):S31-S42. PubMed ID: 29958904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte Carlo Evaluation of Two-Level Logistic Regression for Assessing Person Fit.
    Woods CM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2008; 43(1):50-76. PubMed ID: 26788972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring Aberrant Responses Using Person Fit and Person Response Functions.
    Walker AA; Engelhard G; Hedgpeth MW; Royal KD
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(2):194-208. PubMed ID: 28009584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.