151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29881107)
1. Item Response Theory Models for Ipsative Tests With Multidimensional Pairwise Comparison Items.
Wang WC; Qiu XL; Chen CW; Ro S; Jin KY
Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Nov; 41(8):600-613. PubMed ID: 29881107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A dual process item response theory model for polytomous multidimensional forced-choice items.
Qiu X; de la Torre J
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 Nov; 76(3):491-512. PubMed ID: 36967236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized Adaptive Testing for Ipsative Tests with Multidimensional Pairwise-Comparison Items: Algorithm Development and Applications.
Qiu XL; de la Torre J; Ro S; Wang WC
Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jun; 46(4):255-272. PubMed ID: 35601264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of Differential Statement Functioning in Ipsative Tests With Multidimensional Forced-Choice Items.
Qiu XL; Wang WC
Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Mar; 45(2):79-94. PubMed ID: 33627915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Lognormal Ipsative Model for Multidimensional Compositional Items.
Chen CW; Wang WC; Mok MMC; Scherer R
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():573252. PubMed ID: 34712161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can High-Dimensional Questionnaires Resolve the Ipsativity Issue of Forced-Choice Response Formats?
Schulte N; Holling H; Bürkner PC
Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Apr; 81(2):262-289. PubMed ID: 37929263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing Differential Statement Functioning in Polytomous Multidimensional Pairwise Comparison Items.
Qiu XL
J Appl Meas; 2020; 21(3):329-346. PubMed ID: 33983903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On Bank Assembly and Block Selection in Multidimensional Forced-Choice Adaptive Assessments.
Kreitchmann RS; Sorrel MA; Abad FJ
Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Apr; 83(2):294-321. PubMed ID: 36866066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multidimensional IRT for forced choice tests: A literature review.
Nie L; Xu P; Hu D
Heliyon; 2024 Mar; 10(5):e26884. PubMed ID: 38449643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Dominance Variant Under the Multi-Unidimensional Pairwise-Preference Framework: Model Formulation and Markov Chain Monte Carlo Estimation.
Morillo D; Leenen I; Abad FJ; Hontangas P; de la Torre J; Ponsoda V
Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Oct; 40(7):500-516. PubMed ID: 29881066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigating the Normativity of Trait Estimates from Multidimensional Forced-Choice Data.
Frick S; Brown A; Wetzel E
Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):1-29. PubMed ID: 34464217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How IRT can solve problems of ipsative data in forced-choice questionnaires.
Brown A; Maydeu-Olivares A
Psychol Methods; 2013 Mar; 18(1):36-52. PubMed ID: 23148475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the Validity of Forced Choice Scores Derived From the Thurstonian Item Response Theory Model.
Walton KE; Cherkasova L; Roberts RD
Assessment; 2020 Jun; 27(4):706-718. PubMed ID: 31007043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. GGUM-RANK Statement and Person Parameter Estimation With Multidimensional Forced Choice Triplets.
Lee P; Joo SH; Stark S; Chernyshenko OS
Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 May; 43(3):226-240. PubMed ID: 31019358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Controlling for Response Biases in Self-Report Scales: Forced-Choice vs. Psychometric Modeling of Likert Items.
Kreitchmann RS; Abad FJ; Ponsoda V; Nieto MD; Morillo D
Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2309. PubMed ID: 31681103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the Statistical and Practical Limitations of Thurstonian IRT Models.
Bürkner PC; Schulte N; Holling H
Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 79(5):827-854. PubMed ID: 31488915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling Multidimensional Forced Choice Measures with the Zinnes and Griggs Pairwise Preference Item Response Theory Model.
Joo SH; Lee P; Stark S
Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(2):241-261. PubMed ID: 34370564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fitting a Thurstonian IRT model to forced-choice data using Mplus.
Brown A; Maydeu-Olivares A
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1135-47. PubMed ID: 22733226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using Likert-type and ipsative/forced choice items in sequence to generate a preference.
Ried LD
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2014; 10(4):598-607. PubMed ID: 24263015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic Classification Model for Forced-Choice Items and Noncognitive Tests.
Huang HY
Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Feb; 83(1):146-180. PubMed ID: 36601255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
